Influence - Year 2012 - Judgments

May 31 2012 (HC)

Thiyam Imocha Vs. the District Magistrate and Others

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: May-31-2012

..... the constitutional requirements of article 22 5 insists that all basic facts and particulars which influenced the detaining authority in arriving at the requisite satisfaction leading to the making of ..... constitutional requirements of article 22 5 insists that all basic facts and particulars which influenced the detaining authority in arriving at the requisite satisfaction leading to the making of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2012 (HC)

Pradeep S/O Gyanchand Raisoni Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Ad ...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on: Aug-02-2012

..... and record however the accused and his other conspirers and abettors were successful in influencing the state government the administration generally and the investigation machinery in stalling the ..... has a totally different magnitude in this case the accused persons were successful in influencing the administration the government and the machinery who controls the investigation process and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 06 2012 (HC)

Gurmeet Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Nov-06-2012

..... the pressure of persons holding power in the government political bigwigs are known even to influence the independence and conscience of a functionary like a public prosecutor to withdraw from ..... in our domain in which high ranking executive functionaries like minister of the union was influencing decisions at different strata of governance when such functionaries like a principal secretary of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 19 2012 (HC)

Reserved On: 10th January, 2012 Vs. Cbi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-19-2012

..... harassed and threatened only till they were working under the petitioners thereafter there was no influence on the witnesses and they made their statements fearlessly before the cbi thus the evidence ..... petitioners at large would intimidate the witnesses further one co accused who was actually found influencing the prosecution witness is not the petitioner before this court 16 as regards delay in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 2012 (SC)

Vodafone International Holdings B.V. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-20-2012

..... guidelines to group subsidiaries however the fact that a parent company exercises shareholder s influence on its subsidiaries does not generally imply that the subsidiaries are to be deemed ..... the interests of those companies subsidiaries the fact that the parent company exercises shareholder s influence on its subsidiaries cannot obliterate the decision making power or authority of its subsidiary .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2012 (TRI)

Ashok Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Department ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-01-2012

..... and set aside by the tribunal therefore the possibility of the applicant manipulating the evidence influencing the witnesses and tampering with the documents in departmental proceedings may not be there as ..... our opinion continuance of suspension of the applicant may not be necessary as he cannot influence witnesses or tamper evidence which aspect should be examined by the respondents at the relevant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 23 2012 (HC)

Bhavesh NavIn Shah Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-23-2012

..... obliging police officers cannot be expected to insulate themselves from the influence of their senior officer who notebly is having connections with ..... in the hierarchy of police in punjab and yield great influence and power which he was using to threaten the petitioner ..... outside interference intervene in this trial and if there is such influence over the course of trial to take remedial measures the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2012 (HC)

Pradeep S/O Gyanchand Raisoni Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Ad ...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on: Aug-02-2012

..... and record however the accused and his other conspirers and abettors were successful in influencing the state government the administration generally and the investigation machinery in stalling the ..... has a totally different magnitude in this case the accused persons were successful in influencing the administration the government and the machinery who controls the investigation process and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 09 2012 (HC)

Raje Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-09-2012

..... that even though the said witness had categorically deposed that the petitioner was under the influence of alcohol and he had creating nuisance by using four letters expletives however still he ..... ruddresh kumar thus if these witnesses have deposed categorically that the petitioner was under the influence of liquor and have also given the explanation that when the medical examination was done .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 30 2012 (HC)

Dhanisha, Thiruvananthapuram Vs. Rakhi N Raj, Thiruvananthapuram and A ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-30-2012

..... connection the interests of our contemporary society and particularly the influence of the book etc on it must not be overlooked ..... and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences 8221 14 this decision was rendered considering 8216 obscenity 8217 ..... and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences while considering the allegation that the publication was 8216 obscene .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Influence - Judgment Search Results