Inferential - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: inferential Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 28 results (0.005 seconds)K.M. Chinnappa and T.N. Godavarman Thirumalpad Vs. Union of India (Uoi ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-30-2002
Reported in: AIR2003SC724; 2003(2)ALLMR(SC)389; 2003(51)BLJR324; [2003(1)JCR105(SC)]; JT2002(9)SC200
arijit pasayat j 1 by destroying nature environment man is committing matricide having in a way killed mother earth technological...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGovernment of A.P. and anr. Vs. Sri Venkateswara Construction Co., Kak ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-16-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)ALD142
..... no 1 an arbitrator being a creature of the agreement unless agreement either specifically or inferentially provides for a higher rate to be awarded for any additional or excess work done ..... that the arbitrator is a creature under the agreement unless the agreement either specifically or inferentially provides for higher rate to be awarded for any additional or excess work done by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrithvey Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2002
Reported in: 2002IIIAD(Delhi)698; 2002CriLJ2874; 96(2002)DLT785
..... in the ordinary course of nature this part of the enquiry is purely objective and inferential and has nothing to do with the intention of the offender 1 by this common ..... in the ordinary course of nature this part of the enquiry is purely objective and inferential and has nothing to do with the intention of the offender 26 it is this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Waheed Khan @ Waheed and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-27-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC2961; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)509; JT2002(6)SC274; (2002)7SCC175; [2002]SUPP1SCR703; 2002(2)LC1298(SC)
..... in the ordinary course of nature this part of the enquiry is purely objective and inferential and has nothing to do with the intention of the offender 18 the ingredients of ..... in the ordinary course of nature this part of the enquiry is purely objective and inferential and has nothing to do with the intention of the offender 19 the learned judge .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRuli Ram and anr. Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-17-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC3360; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)241; 2002CriLJ4337; JT2002(7)SC267; 2002(6)SCALE506; (2002)7SCC691; [2002]SUPP2SCR426
..... in the ordinary course of nature this part of the enquiry is purely objective and inferential and has nothing to do with the intention of the offender 15 the ingredient of ..... in the ordinary course of nature this part of the enquiry is purely objective and inferential and has nothing to do with the intention of the offender 16 the leaned judge .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH.B. Stockholdings Ltd. Vs. Joint Cit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-2002
Reported in: (2004)87TTJ(Del)127
..... it is the primary facts which are to be disclosed by the assessed and not inferential facts it was not possible to agree with revenue s contention that section 158b did .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChitra Devi Vs. Asstt. Cit
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-17-2002
Reported in: (2002)77TTJ(NULL)640
..... containing the reasons for formation of belief as postulated under section 132 1 the only inferential conclusion that the tribunal may irresistibly but appropriately draw is that in fact there did .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Ganesan Vs. S. Issac (Deceased),
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-12-2002
Reported in: AIR2003Mad208; (2002)3MLJ471
..... it has to be established satisfactorily and cannot be presumed merely on the basis of inferential reasoning in other words the plea of a bar under order 2 rule 2 c .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.L. Sreedhar and ors. Vs. K.M. Munireddy (Dead) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-05-2002
Reported in: AIR2003SC578; [2003(1)JCR137(SC)]; JT2002(10)SC363; (2003)2SCC355
..... the main plea is the principle of estoppel and res judicata are not applicable the inferential conclusions of the high court about the plantiff s role in various proceedings are contrary .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhatia International Vs. Bulk Trading S.A. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-13-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC1432; 2002(6)ALD108(SC); 2002(1)ARBLR675(SC); (2002)IICompLJ361(SC); JT2002(3)SC150; (2002)2MLJ175(SC); 2002(2)MPHT437; 2002(2)SCALE612; (2002)4SCC105; [2002]37SCL
..... jurisdiction may not be ousted unless the very statutory provision explicitly indicates or even by inferential conclusion the court arrives at the same when such a conclusion is the only conclusion .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial