Ineligibility - Judgment Search Results

Arcelormittal India Private Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... period of at least one year before commencement of the corporate insolvency resolution process becomes ineligible to submit a resolution plan this provision therefore ensures that if a person wishes ..... 112 committee of creditors shall not approve a resolution plan where the resolution applicant is ineligible under section 29a and may require the resolution professional to invite a fresh resolution .....

Ramdass Vs. Angelone

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for the authoritative determination of the virginia supreme court is that petitioner was not ineligible for parole when the jury considered his sentence in simmons the defendant had conclusively ..... require courts to estimate the likelihood of future contingencies concerning the defendant s parole ineligibility rather simmons entitles the defendant to inform the capital sentencing jury that he is .....

Jarnail Singh, Assistant Excise Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh

Reported in: (2007)(1)SLJ101CAT

..... by selection regulations 1997 applicable in this case do not envisage consideration of ineligible officers consideration of ineligible officers could be contrary to the provisions of the selection regulations and that ..... 2002 praying that the commission be allowed to convene the dpc after excluding the ineligible persons it was stressed in this cm emphatically that as per the selection regulations .....

Arun Kumar Jagatramka Vs. Jindal Steel And Power Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... expense of creditors and undermining the processes laid down in the code 46 significantly the ineligibility which was engrafted by the amending legislation was incorporated in both the provisions of ..... amended along with the enactment of the code there is no explicit prohibition on persons ineligible to submit resolution plans under section 29a from proposing compromise or arrangement made under .....

Board of Educ. of City Sch. Dist. Vs. Harris

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in the constitutional sense held 1 discriminatory impact is the standard by which ineligibility under esaa is to be measured irrespective of whether the discrimination relates to ..... or otherwise engaged in discrimination based upon race color or national origin which renders ineligible local educational agencies which have engaged in other discrimination including discrimination in hiring .....

Oyama Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... naivete to insist that these desirable characteristics are always lacking in a racially ineligible alien whose ineligibility may be remedied tomorrow by congress footnote 3 22 these are matters ..... consistent with the constitution of the united states can a state prohibit all aliens ineligible for american citizenship from acquiring owning occupying enjoying leasing or transferring agricultural land .....

Reno Vs. Catholic Social Services, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... desked applicants from ever obtaining judicial review of the regulations that rendered them ineligible for legalization unfortunately however neither the css record nor the lulac record ..... in affirmative misconduct by promulgating the invalid regulations which deterred aliens who were ineligible under those regulations from applying for legalization see plaintiffs submission re availability of .....

Simmons Vs. South Carolina

Court: US Supreme Court

..... request petitioner proffered outside the presence of the jury evidence conclusively establishing his parole ineligibility on petitioner s behalf attorneys for the south carolina department of corrections and ..... that petitioner was not entitled to an instruction informing the jury that petitioner is ineligible for parole because such information is inherently misleading 6 essentially they argue that .....

Bhayana Builders Pvt Ltd vs.oriental Structural Engineers Pvt Ltd

Court: Delhi

..... the learned senior counsel for the appellant that once the managing director becomes ineligible he also becomes ineligible to nominate refuting the said stand it is canvassed by the learned senior ..... the question before the supreme court thereafter was the managing director having become ineligible does he also become ineligible to nominate an arbitrator in his place the supreme court relying upon .....

Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited Vs. M/s Ajay Sales And ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... notwithstanding the same non independence and non impartiality of such arbitrator would render him ineligible to conduct the arbitration it is further observed that the genesis behind this rational ..... non independence and non impartiality of such arbitrator though contractually agreed upon would render him ineligible to conduct the arbitration the genesis behind this rational is that even when an .....