Court : Delhi
..... profile of such company at least 3 months in advance so that the background check of the ground handling agency can be done by the bcas through ib and local police.(v) background check in respect of the ground handling agencies working in the airports is necessary. therefore, aai/aircraft operator shall send the details of the each existing ground handling .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... determining whether the predominant object of an activity is advancement of a charitable purpose or profit-making. but cases are bound to arise in practice which may be on the border line and in such cases the solution of the problem whether the purpose is charitable or not may involve much refinement and present real difficulty." 14. the most material and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1997VAD(Delhi)689; 69(1997)DLT188
..... -3) that the accused gyan singh used to accompany gurmeet kaur, (dw-i) to meet harjinder singh (public witness -91) when he was in police custody in police station, kirti nagar in connection with the criminal case registered against him under sections 170/420/511, ipc. further, mahabir singh (dw-4) asst. ..... subjected to intensive and incisive cross-examination, nothing tangible has been brought out for discarding their testimony. the recovery of certain incriminating articles by the police serve as strong pieces of circumstantial evidence for corroborating the testimony of these witnesses and implicating the appellant with the offence. the conclusion of the ..... persons, after interrogation, appeared to be innocent and were released; but the arms and ammunition found in the vehicle were seized and deposited in the malkhana of police station kingsway camp. s.h.o. dalbir singh (public witness -149) recorded statements of eight persons, including anoop kumar (public witness -15), under section .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR133(Delhi); 141(2007)DLT822
Gita Mittal, J.1. This petition raises two very interesting questions which are required to be answered. The first question raised is whether a party can seek interim relief on the ground that the other side has raised a dispute before the Arbitral Tribunal. The second question which has been raised by the respondent is to the effect that on account of sickness of its partner in a joint venture under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, the underlying shareholders agreement between the parties is rendered frustrated and incapable of implementation. Consequently, the petitioner cannot base a petition for prohibitory relief based on a clause in this agreement which prohibited the parties thereto from undertaking any business similar to that of the joint venture during its currency.2. So far as the basic facts are concerned, there is no material dispute and to the extent necessary, they are noticed hereinafter. The petitioner M/s Modi Rubber Ltd., (hereinafter referred ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1995Delhi516
Dalveer Bhandari, J.(1) (ORAL).-THIS petition is filed under article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 7th December, i993, 9th December, 1993 and 15th January, 1994 passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal, Sales Tax in appeal Nos. 886, 887 in the assessment years 1988-89 and in the review petition No. 80193 arising out of appeal Nos. 886-887. Brief facts necessary to dispose of this petition are recapitulated as under :- (2) The proceedings in this case where initiated on 15-5-1992, when the petitioner was called to cause appearance and produce evidence in support of the returns filed. On these dates of hearing, the petitioner did not appear before the Assessing Authority. and thereafter he appeared on 15-6-92 only to get the hearing adjourned as some of the required statutory forms could not be received. The Assessing Authority again on the request of the petitioner adjourned the case and observed that no further opportunity shall be granted. (3) On 18-8-92, th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)65; 55(1994)DLT80; 1994(30)DRJ105
..... 37 rpc 177; sheraton corporation 1916 (4) rpc 202 and globe elegance 1974 rpc 603, i said that the indian courts have recognised the existence of trans-border reputation. the trans- border reputation had, particularly, been recognised in thecase reported kamal trading co. & ors. v. gillette u.k. ltd. (1988) 1 plr 135. (112) these ..... with copper and gold coloured borders, respectively, is represented directly above the upper scroll bearing the words 'special reserve' in white upon a black background while another oblong device is represented in ..... the word glenfiddich and the words 'scotch whisky' in running script with elaborate initials, under these; f) two identical scrolls coloured deep gold with pale gold borders; outlined by fine black lines, appear on the upper and lower ends of the central label bearing the artistic features described above; g) an oblong device .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 73(1998)DLT732
ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The plaintiffs claiming to be engaged in the sale of suit cases all over the globe have instituted the suit against the defendants stating that the defendants have infringed the plaintiff's copyright in drawings; the defendants are passing off their goods and they are imitating the trade dress in making the suit cases to sell their products. The defendants resist the case of the plaintiffs on various grounds. In view of the fact that the parties relied heavily on their respective pleadings to project their respective contentions and the arguments covered a very wide canvass, it has become necessary for me to refer to the pleadings in the first instance and then to deal with the rival contentions put forth at the time of the arguments and the precedents referred to by the learned counsel for the parties.2. The case of the plaintiffs could be recounted in the following terms. The first plaintiff Samsonite Corporation is a Company operating under the State of Del...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
1. The petitioners, as pro-bono publico, have preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of mandamus commanding the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (for short the Commission), the respondent No.2 herein, to issue the tariff order approved by it on 28th/29th April, 2010 and pass such other order/orders as may be deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. It is profitable to note here that various assertions have been made with regard to the issues relating to the finalization of the tariff by the Commission under the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for brevity 2003 Act), the illegality committed by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) in asking the Commission not to issue the tariff and further how the consumers have been affected by the non-issuance of the tariff order. In the course of the pendency of the writ petition, there was impleadment of certain respondents, namely, BSE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... jail authorities at sub-jail koilkuntla. "on being lodged in jail, the deceased challa chinnappa reddy and challa ramkrishna reddy (p.w.1) both informed the inspector of police that there was a conspiracy to kill them and their lives were in danger. ... in spite of the representation made by the deceased and challa ramkrishna reddy, adequate protection ..... for the purpose of examination and treatment whenever necessary as per the opinion of the jail doctors and for this purpose also, the same procedure may be followed regarding police escort as stated above. 7. all the hospitals under the control of the government who are expected to treat the prisoners either in the normal cases or in ..... (1975) 3 scc 185, chandrachud, j. (as he then was) held as under (scc @ 188): "the security of one's person against an arbitrary encroachment by the police is basic to a free society and prisoners cannot be thrown at the mercy of policemen as if it were a part of an unwritten law of crimes. such intrusions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Manmohan Singh, J. 1. The plaintiffs filed the present suit for injunction seeking various prayers inter alia decree a decree of declaration that the defendant's drug has not been tested as a biosimilar product under applicable law, defendant No. 3's CTR Registration Number CTR/2013/04/ 003549 is invalid and is not in accordance with applicable law. A decree of declaration that the approval granted by defendant No. 1 on October 29, 2012 to defendant No. 3's clinical trial protocol for the defendant's Drug is invalid and is not in accordance with applicable law and the manufacturing and marketing authorisation approved on 2nd June, 2015 by defendant No. 1 to defendant No. 3 for the defendant's drug for all of the Indications is invalid. 2. By this order I propose to decide the above mentioned two applications. 3. It is alleged in the plaint that the suit has been filed on account of the imminent threat and credible apprehension of the launch of defendant No. 3's drug, TrastuRel ("Trastu...
Tag this Judgment!