Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2009(41)PTC492(Del)
V.K. Jain, J.1. These Appeals are directed against the common Order dated 8.4.2009 passed in IA 2552/2004 in CS(OS) No. 155/2004, IA 2551/2004 in CS(OS) No. 156/2004, IA 2550/2004 in CS(OS ) No. 157/2004, whereby the status quo order dated 7.1.97 passed in CS(OS) No. 156/04 was vacated and the appellants were restrained from using the trademark 'Kangaro' for stationery items, till the final disposal of these suits. The brief facts, giving rise to these appeals are as under.2. Late Shri Janki Dass Jain, father of Shri Arihant Jain, Jaininder Jain and Shri Vishwa Jain, who was doing business in the name and style of M/s.Kangaro Industries (Regd.) as its sole proprietor, adopted and started using trademark 'KANGARO'. On 3.3.1963, late Shri Janki Dass Jain and his son Arihant Jain, vide partnership deed dated 3.4.1963, agreed to become partners in M/s.Kangaro Industries (Regd.), with share of Shri Janki Dass Jain at 63 per cent and that of Shri Arihant Jain at 37 per cent. On 1.4.1974, Shr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1978Delhi536
..... itself (es. public witness .101/c) .specifically states as follows ; 'on entering the court the accused got hisface unmuffled'. the public prosecutor, the costiceroed police offcials,f v. jaggi, his father aad counsel were all present in court. nothingsignificant turns .upon 'ex. public witness 101(1 having beea mistakenly.takenback from ..... be proved even by the solitary evidence of an investigating officer if his evidence could otherwise be believed. any suchdiscovery would, however, become inadmissible if the police partyknew where they were hidden .(90) in the light of the above principles an effort will now be madeto analyze and discuss the disclosure statements alleged ..... that all of them travelledfrom bhopal to delhi by plane on 13th december with the police.therewas no suggestion to squadron. leader tarlok singh dhaliwal(p.w. 88), who brought the accused (except v. jaggi) from bhopalin the border security force plane piloted by him, that any of thewitnesses travelled in the plane. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : [1996]85CompCas716(Delhi); 1995(35)DRJ647
Dalveer Bhandari, J. (1) Abn Amro Bank N.V. has filed the company appeal under Section 10(F) of the Companies Act, in which a prayer has been made to set aside the order dated August 25, 1994 passed by the company law board. It is also prayed in the appeal that the Company petition filed by the appellant before the Company Law Board be allowed and respondent no.1 be directed to rectify the register maintained by it in respect of the said IRFC bonds, by entering the appellant's name as the holder of the said 1 lakh 9% (tax free) secured redeemable non-convertible (VIth A series 1991-92) Bonds of Rs.1000.00 each and to restore to the appellant the said letter of allotment, after making due endorsements and issue bonds certificate in respect of the said bonds to the appellant along with interest warrants. (2) The appellant has also prayed that respondents no.1 to 4 be directed to pay compensation for non-payment of interest on the said IRFC bonds on and after June 26, 1992, comprising the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1996IIAD(Delhi)209; 1996(37)DRJ207
..... the entire property bearing no.46, friends colony, new delhi to the petitioners within four weeks failing which the additional rent controller is directed to issue warrants of possession with police aid and orders for breaking open the locks and doors of the premises in order to ensure immediate delivery of possession of the entire property to the landlords. this petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2000(54)DRJ639
Vikramajit Sen, J. 1. By this order I propose to dispose off the present application filed on behalf of Respondent under Order VII rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This application has been filed in OMP 200/99 which has been preferred under Section 9 of the, Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). On being satisfied that the circumstances of the case so warrant, I had restrainedthe Respondent from selling, alienating or creating any third party interests in properly bearing No. B-16, Bhagwan Dass Nagar. New Delhi. On receiving notice of the Petition, this application has been filed in which the substantial challenge is centered on the maintainability of the Petition itself. As the first order dated 16.7.1999 will indicate, it is not in controversy that when the Petition was filed, the disputes were alreadybeing adjudicated in London before Mr. Clive Aston, Arbitrator, pursuant to orders of the High Court of Justice at Lo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)353; 98(2002)DLT525; [2002]257ITR123(Delhi)
..... the information or material and the belief about undisclosed income which has not been and is not likely to be disclosed by the person concerned. a bare intimation by the police or for that matter by any person, without something more, cannot be considered sufficient for action under section 132 of the act, for it would be giving naked powers to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)53; 1997CriLJ2559; 1997(4)Crimes1; 66(1997)DLT618; 1997(41)DRJ274; (1997)116PLR1; 1997RLR292
..... section 5) to follow the same procedure as is followed by a magistrate for trial of warrant cases instituted on a police report. sections 239 & 240 cr.p.c. deal with the framing of charges in cases instituted on a police report under chapter i of the criminal procedure code . entitled ' trial of warrant cases by a magistrate'. section 239 envisages ' if, upon considering ..... the police report and the documents sent with it under section 173 and making such examination, if any, of the accused as the magistrate thinks necessary and after giving the prosecution and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... kumar (2010) 3 ssc161 in that case several appeals had been filed by the union of india and the main contesting respondent in all those appeals were members of border security force. the respondents had succeeded before the high court which took the view that the orders passed by ssfc and the appellate authority were bad and illegal as there ..... , the orders are liable to be set aside.32. the contention of the respondent on the other hand is that there is no requirement under provisions of the border security force act and rules thereunder for the ssfc to give reasons while giving findings of guilty or not guilty and that reasons are also not required to be ..... hon'ble ms. justice gita mittal hon'ble ms. justice deepa sharma deepa sharma, j.1. the petitioner in this case was enrolled as a constable no.860020697 in border security force (hereinafter referred to as bsf ) on 10.07.1968 and after completion of his training course he was attached with 09 battalion of bsf artillery battalion of 1011 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : II(1990)BC51; [1992]73CompCas701(Delhi); 41(1990)DLT359; 1990RLR252
Mahinder Narain, J.(1) By this order, I propose to deal with an interim application bearing I.A. No. 3945 of 1989, filed by the Nangia Construction (India) Private Ltd (hereinafter called the Petitioners) in Suit No. 1375-A of 1989. (2) Suit No. 1375-A of 1989 has been filed under section 20 of the Arbitration Act. (3) The interim application I.A. No. 3945 of 1989 has been filed under action 41 read with Second Schedule of the Arbitration Act 1940, and section 151 of the Code Civil Procedure. By the said interim application, the. applicant/petitioner prays that respondent No. 1 National Buildings Construction Corporation Ltd., and respondent No. 2, the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the National Buildings Construction Corporation Ltd., be restrained from terminating the contract which contains an arbitration clause, it is also prayed that the National Building Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter called 'the NBCC'), be restrained from encashing to bank guarantees No. NP/G/16/136 and NP/G/1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 169(2009)DLT226
..... eating house, no structural changes have been made therein. even otherwise, construction at the site is well within building bye laws. on 11.2.2000, a police official from local police station, came to suit property for survey of same and appellants were shocked to learnt that respondents had passed orders for demolition of suit property on the ground ..... and same was also dismissed.44. the appellate court, while dismissing the suit of surat singh, referred to the pleadings made in the plaint,that on 29-2-1992, police officials along with the officials of dda visited the site and proceeded to demolish inter alia the boundary wall of the disputed land. clearly, therefore, the cause of action ..... struck out on the ground that the action is frivolous and vexations and an abuse of the process of court.45. in mcllkenny v. chief constable of west midlands police force and anr. (1980) 2 all er 227, the court of appeal in england struck out the pleading on the ground that the action was an abuse of .....
Tag this Judgment!