Indo Tibetan Border Police Force Act 1992 Section 79 - Judgment Search Results

S.B. Dogra Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT1992(5)SC667; (1993)IILLJ807SC; 1992(2)SCALE642; (1992)4SCC455; [1992]Supp1SCR825; 1993(2)SLJ167(SC)

indian army and appointed as deputy superintendent of police in indo tibetan border police he joined delhi himachal pradesh andaman and appointed as deputy superintendent of police company commander in indo tibetan border police in 1967 before his absorption in the latter and appointed as deputy superintendent of police in indo tibetan border police he joined delhi himachal pradesh andaman and nicobar island state of himachal pradesh he was allocated to the state police service w e f january 25 1971 in 1974 he commissioned officers or short service commissioned officers of the armed forces the case involved the interpretation of the 1973 and 1980 benefit of seniority for more than the period of his actual service in the army during the emergency even if he by drawing personnel from the erstwhile dhani police service sub section 6 of section 40 next provided that the rules and

A.S. Pathania and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)872; 55(1994)DLT468; 1994(30)DRJ362; 1994LabIC2520

and that the union of india and the director general indo tibetan border police respondents 1and 2 respectively have thereby not wide enough to include all gazetted posts in the indo tibetan border police would have given place to some other words enough to include all gazetted posts in the indo tibetan border police would have given place to some other words like substituted with effect from april 6 1985 by central reserve police force 2nd amendment rule 1985 and which speaks of the pu in nearly 8 years of gazetted service in the force their claim for being considered for promotion to the post move the court before other rights come into exislence the action of courts cannot harm innocent parties if their rights emerge authority this eligibility condition has to be fulfillled by the section officers including senior direct recruits in order to be eligible om no 14017 24 86 estt rr dated 22 5 79 and later on revised vide om dated 18 3 88

Dr.H.L.Raskaran Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

security force bsf ii central reserved police force crpf iii indo tibetan border police itbp iv shashtra seema bal ssb v force bsf ii central reserved police force crpf iii indo tibetan border police itbp iv shashtra seema bal ssb v central are 6 central para military forces in india being i border security force bsf ii central reserved police force crpf iii india being i border security force bsf ii central reserved police force crpf iii indo tibetan border police itbp iv shashtra 4 we note the name of the central para military force and in column 5 we note the date of appointment it is apparent that there is complete arbitrariness in the action of the official respondents and thus we dispose of the

R.S. Sharad and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008(104)DRJ169

are wide enough to include all gazetted posts in the indo tibetan border police would have given place to some other wide enough to include all gazetted posts in the indo tibetan border police would have given place to some other words enough to include all gazetted posts in the indo tibetan border police would have given place to some other words like or assistant principal central training colleges of the central reserve police force i feel no hesitation in rejecting it the rule gazetted service and secondly completion of such service in the force which are wide enough to include all gazetted posts in no 1 and 2 5 petitioners aggrieved by the aforesaid action of respondents have filed the present writ petition they have is also submitted that prior to enforcement of itbpf act 1992 and rules made thereunder itbpf was regulated under the provisions 4 the aforesaid judgment was delivered by taking into consideration section 105 of crpf second amendment rule 1985 sub para 3

L/Nk V.H.K. Murthy Vs. Special Protection Group and Another

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)624; 2000(57)DRJ157

99 8 petitioner in this case is regular employee of indo tibetan border police itbp where he joined as constable on 8 petitioner in this case is regular employee of indo tibetan border police itbp where he joined as constable on 16 petitioner in this case is regular employee of indo tibetan border police itbp where he joined as constable on 16 8 3043 98 2 petitioner is permanent employee of central reserve police force crpf where he was appointed as constable on 27 where he is joining on deputation thereforee there is a force in the arguments of respondents that for spg the respondents repatriate him back to his parent department and such an action would clearly be arbitrary if the officer is sent back permanent basis with crpf since 30 6 81 in december 1992 his consent was taken for going on deputation to spg

Narottam Dass Beshtoo Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1995SC1154; JT1994(5)SC644; 1995LabIC1596; (1995)ILLJ564SC; 1994(4)SCALE25; 1994Supp(3)SCC264; [1994]Supp2SCR670; 1994(2)LC643(SC)

of what has been stated in rule 187 of the indo tibetan border police force 1994 7 in view of the same is governed by what has been provided in indo tibetan border police force lower division clerk recruitment rules 1973 which given in section 2 1 p of the indo tibetan border police force act 1992 for short the act this submission shri mohanty appearing for the petitioners is that as this police force is an armed force of the union the incumbents come to be enacted the provisions governing central reserve police force were applicable to the members of the force at hand j of sub section 1 of section 2 of the act such a person is only a constable as already held 1 p of the indo tibetan border police force act 1992 for short the act this submission is countered by shri stands disposed of accordingly motor vehicles act 59 of 1988 section 168 s b sinha v s sirpurkar jj accident contributory

Gorakhnath Pradhan Son of Sri Raj NaraIn Pradhan Vs. the Union of Indi ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(4)AWC4204

after selection appointment of the petitioner as a constable in indo tibetan border police force in the said report of the 28 10 1996 passed by the commandant first battalion indo tibetan border police force respondent no 2 and for a direction appointment of the petitioner as a constable in indo tibetan border police force in the said report of the district magistrate of the petitioner as a constable in indo tibetan border police force in the said report of the district magistrate ghazipur passed by the commandant first battalion indo tibetan border police force respondent no 2 and for a direction to the respondents 13 i of scheduled caste and scheduled tribes atrocities prevention act neither any process was issued nor the petitioner was ever under sections 323 504 427 i p c read with section 13 i of scheduled caste and scheduled tribes atrocities prevention

Naresh Chandra JaIn and ors. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000IIAD(Delhi)552; 2000(52)DRJ707

home affairs new delhi from the inspector general of police indo tibetan border police new delhi stating that the lease agreement affairs new delhi from the inspector general of police indo tibetan border police new delhi stating that the lease agreement is commercial rate aforesaid property was rented out to indo tibetan border police but later on possession thereof was transferred to bureau of possession of the said property to indo tibetan border police for running the office therein body of this letter which directorate of estate it is denied that the plaintiffs were forced to sign the lease agreement or they signed it under sft already measured and assessed by the cpwd in 1967 actually at the time of agreeing to rent out the building

Usha Aggarwal and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1985P& H279

division which had moved to the front during the 1971 indo pak war it was during the movement of this division to the claimants on the ground that the offending indo tibetan border police truck dhl 79 was engaged in the performance n d sharma d s p of the indo tibetan border police who deposed that on receipt of a telephonic message from the opposite direction as a result of which the police truck had to go on to the kacha portion of nature of a restraint on the remedy provided under the act so viewed two inferences are clear viz 1 sections 80 accepted with costs counsel fee rs 500 26 appeal allowed sections 80 2 89 punjab motor vehicles rules 1989 rules 85 ground that the offending indo tibetan border police truck dhl 79 was engaged in the performance of the sovereign functions of

Dev Sharma vs.indo Tibetan Border Police & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... on 28th august 1982 4 3 with effect from 1st september 1992 the indo tibetan border police act 1992 itbp act came into force section 157 2 of the itbp act stated that all members of the itbp in existence as ..... the petitioners which have not been able to be disputed by the respondents 426 347 79 cpf ac assistant commandant exam20101 allotted 2 reported joined 3 not reported joined cpf ac .....