Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 section 102 documents exempted from production Page 11 of about 173 results (1.035 seconds)

Kennedy Vs. the Charity Commission

Court : UK Supreme Court

1. Information is the key to sound decision-making, to accountability and development; it underpins democracy and assists in combatting poverty, oppression, corruption, prejudice and inefficiency. Administrators, judges, arbitrators, and persons conducting inquiries and investigations depend upon it; likewise the press, NGOs and individuals concerned to report on issues of public interest. Unwillingness to disclose information may arise through habits of secrecy or reasons of self-protection. But information can be genuinely private, confidential or sensitive, and these interests merit respect in their own right and, in the case of those who depend on information to fulfil their functions, because this may not otherwise be forthcoming. These competing considerations, and the balance between them, lie behind the issues on this appeal. 2. This appeal concerns the relationship between the Charity Commission, a public authority responsible for inquiries in relation to which it requires inf...

Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. Vs. Town of Harrison

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of this case and its reading of board of ed. of ky.-which is obviously the correct one. 607 legislated distinction between charity "bestowed within her borders and for her people" and charity bestowed elsewhere or for others did not implicate commerce at all, except to the indirect and permissible extent that innumerable state ..... have achieved the same goal-by making the out-of-state fish noncompetitive and thereby excluding them from the market even more effectively than a difficult-to-police ban on importation. where regulatory discrimination against out-of-state interests is appropriate, the negative commerce clause is not designed to push a state into nonregulatory ..... which none of the charitable activities of the legatee were performed in illinois, all of the benefits of attending petitioner's camp in maine are "bestowed within her borders." id., at 563. while the dictum that justice scalia quotes, post, at 606, is consistent with his analysis, it does not purport to address the .....

Costa Rica Versus Nicaragua

Court : International Court of Justice ICJ

..... unanimously, finds that costa rica does not have the right of navigation on the san juan river for the purposes of the exchange of personnel of the police border posts along the right bank of the river and of the re-supply of these posts, with official equipment, including service arms and ammunition; (2) ..... obligation to allow costa rican official vessels the right to navigate the san juan, including for the purposes of re-supply and exchange of personnel of the border posts along the right bank of the river with their official equipment, including service arms and ammunition, and for the purposes of protection as established in the ..... to maintain public order and standards of safety in respect of navigation; (b) the protection of the border, including resort to immigration procedures in respect of foreign nationals navigating in nicaraguas territorial waters; (c) the exercise of normal police powers; (d) the protection of the environment and natural resources; and (e) the maintenance of the .....

Srf Limited and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in : (1998)(61)ECC687

1. These appeals arise out of a common order of the Ld. lower authority. Under the impugned order duty of Rs. 4,92,66,826/-has been demanded from the appellant company on various counts invoking the longer period of limitation under Section 11(A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and appellant company as also two employees of the company have also been levied personal penalties for the evasion of duty as held above.2. The appellants are manufacturers of industrial fabrics of different varieties and had filed the classification list as also price lists in respect of the same from time to time. The issues that arise for consideration relate to the classification of various items as set out in the order of the Ld. lower authority as also whether the longer period of limitation was invokable in the facts and circumstances of the case and the appellants liable to penalty as levied. (1) Processed and un-processed fabrics of cotton and made filament yarn and fibre, The other issues that airse ...

United States Vs. Winstar Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the extent this court has suggested that the notion of "reserved powers" contemplates, under some circumstances, nullification of even monetary governmental obligations pursuant to exercise of "the federal police power or some other paramount power," lynch v. united states, 292 u. s. 571 , 579 (1934), i do not believe that regulatory measures designed to minimize ..... 179 u. s. 141 , 163 (1900) ("whatever the nature of the interest of a riparian owner in the submerged lands in front of his upland bordering on a public navigable water, his title is not as full and complete as his title to fast land which has no direct connection with the navigation of such ..... power of sovereignty, will be held ... to have been surrendered, unless 20 see also stone v. mississippi, 101 u. s. 814 (1880) (state may not contract away its police power); butchers' union slaughter-house & livestock landing co. v. crescent city live-stock landing & slaughterhouse co., 111 u. s. 746 (1884) (same); see generally griffith, .....

Prakash Gobindram Ahuja Vs. Ganesh Pandharinath Dhonde and Others

Court : Mumbai

1. This appeal by the plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No.104 of 2012 before the IInd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan questions the order passed by him below Exhibit-5, rejecting his application to restrain defendant No.7 from creating third party interests in the suit property pending hearing of the suit. 2. It is the appellant's case that defendant Nos.1 to 6 owned the suit land and agreed to sell it to the plaintiff by two Agreements of Sale for Rs.30,00,000/- and Rs.17,40,000/-, of which the agreement for Rs.30,00,000/- was registered on 28-1-2011 and the other agreement remained to be registered. The plaintiff paid to defendant Nos.1 to 6 Rs.13,36,600/- towards the transaction. Defendant Nos.1 to 6 however executed registered sale deed in favour of defendant No.7 on 29-3- 2012 and the plaintiff now apprehends that defendant No.7 may create third party interests pending the suit. He, therefore, sought temporary injunction by application Exhibit-5 in the suit filed by him....

Aseem Kapoor vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... licensee had not put in place an emergency evacuation plan to minimize any damage or danger to the life and property and did not give intimation to the local police and police control room about the incident immediately after the incident. (violation of regulation16) 65. it was also submitted on behalf of the sister of the injured that there ..... of the balcony of the auditorium from the left side. all this happened while a large number of people were seated in the auditorium enjoying the matinee show of border , a popular hindi movie with a patriotic theme. because of smoke and carbon monoxide released by the burning oil and other combustible material, the people in the ..... had not put in place an emergency evacuation plan to minimize any damage or danger to the life and property and did not give intimation to the local police and the police control room about the incident immediate after the incidents. 42. as per the charge-sheet, the fourth floor was got inspected by the director cfsl-cum- .....

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 12.2018 Pronounced on:10. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 11467/2018, CM APPL. 44376-44378/2018 MAHINDRA ELECTRIC MOBILITY LIMITED AND ANR. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS versus versus TATA MOTORS LIMITED & ANR COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA versus MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. GENERAL MOTORS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS + W.P.(C) 6610/2014 + W.P.(C) 6634/2014, CM APPL. 20409/2014 + W.P.(C) 7087/2014, CM APPL. 16614/2014, CM APPL. 39827/2018 + W.P.(C) 7121/2014, CM APPL. 16680/2014, CM APPL. 31959/2018 + W.P.(C) 7186/2014, CM APPL. 16889/2014 + W.P.(C) 7306/2014, CM APPL. 17096/2014 + W.P.(C) 7321/2014, CM APPL. 17118/2014 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MERCEDES BENZ INDIA PVT LT...

The Asstt. C.i.T. Vs. National Lamination Industries

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2007)109ITD181(Ahd.)

1. On account of difference between ld. Vice President and Judicial Member of the Income-tax Appellate tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench.Ahmedabad, the following question has been referred to me as a Third Member, under Section 255(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is engaged in manufacturing article or thing entitled to deduction under Section 80IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961? 2. During the course of hearing, my attention was drawn towards unintentional exclusion of the words "or producing" after the words "manufacture" and before the words "article or thing" in the proposed question. With concurrence of the ld. CIT (DR) and the ld. Counsels for the assesses, I am of the view that the words "or producing" should be inserted in the proposed question, after the word "manufacture" and before the words "article or thing". Thus the modified question for consideration will read as under: Whether, on the facts and in the circums...

Boumediene Vs. Bush

Court : US Supreme Court

..... not been employed to rectify the alleged error petitioners complain of, any interference by [a] federal court may be wholly needless. the procedure established to police the errors of the tribunal whose judgment is challenged may be adequate for the occasion. because the majority refuses to assess whether the csrts comport with ..... i.e. , their presence at guantanamo bay. the government contends that noncitizens designated as enemy combatants and detained in territory located outside our nation s borders have no constitutional rights and no privilege of habeas corpus. petitioners contend they do have cognizable constitutional rights and that congress, in seeking to eliminate recourse ..... power to acquire, dispose of, and govern territory, not the power to decide when and where its terms apply. even when the united states acts outside its borders, its powers are not absolute and unlimited but are subject to such restrictions as are expressed in the constitution. murphy v. ramsey , 114 u. s. .....