Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 section 102 documents exempted from production Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 6 results (0.327 seconds)

Jul 12 2017 (HC)

R. Kempamma and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Department of Panch ...

Court : Karnataka

..... in the case of mahadev and others referred above arises under a different set of circumstances where the land had to be earmarked for the purpose of itbp i.e., indo tibetan border police force. this court has found that the decision taken for allotment of the said land by reducing the gomal land in the facts of the said case was keeping in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2005 (HC)

The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority and anr. Vs. State o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR318; 2006(1)KarLJ1

N. Kumar, J.1. The appellants-Bangalore Development Authority (for short, 'the BDA'), the State of Karnataka, the former Chief Minister Sri S.'M. Krishna and two others have challenged in this batch of eight writ appeals the order of the learned Single Judge quashing the acquisition proceedings pertaining to 'ARKAVATHI LAYOUT' as well as the declaration made to the effect that the BDA has no jurisdiction to frame developmental schemes in Bangalore Metropolitan Area and against other reliefs granted in the writ petitions. Some writ petitions have also been filed challenging the acquisition of land for the formation of the 'Arkavathi Layout' on the grounds, which have been upheld by the learned Single Judge, in the impugned judgment under appeal. Since identical questions of law and fact arise for consideration in the writ appeals and the writ petitions they are taken up for consideration together and are being disposed of by this common order. The facts leading to the present proceeding...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2024 (HC)

M/s. Puyvast Maritime India Pvt Ltd Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... in appendix 3d) on net foreign exchange earned. 9.51 "service provider" means a person providing : (i) supply of a 'service' from india to any other country; (mode 1 - cross border trade ); (ii) supply of a 'service' from india to service consumer(s) of any other country in india; (mode 2 - consumption abroad); - 24 - nc:2024. khc:17134 wp no.12068 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2024 (HC)

M/s Ecl Puyvast (india) Pvt Ltd Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... in appendix 3d) on net foreign exchange earned. 9.51 "service provider" means a person providing : (i) supply of a 'service' from india to any other country; (mode 1 - cross border trade ); (ii) supply of a 'service' from india to service consumer(s) of any other country in india; (mode 2 - consumption abroad); - 24 - nc:2024. khc:17134 wp no.12068 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2015 (HC)

Mrs Sharada Urs Vs. Bharthi Urs Rani W/O Late Mr M G Nagaraju

Court : Karnataka

..... for nothing and those e-mails are vulgar and nasty in nature. she has actually gone through those e-mails and handed over the same to the police but the police did not probe into those e-mails. 30.3 pw-49 ramachandra also deposed about the e-mails. he only says that he has got the information ..... not and all the surrounding circumstances including the telephonic conversation, the prosecution has proved this last seen theory. further, it is contended that pw-47 shivaprakash, police constable of mangalore rural police station. he is an official 49 witness, who has deposed that he has seen accused nos.2 & 3 soon after throwing the dead body in ..... subsequent statement of accused no.3 if it is not produced before the court that itself creates a serious doubt whether he gave any further voluntary statement before the police disclosing the said jewels. more over, it is the duty of the investigating officer that immediately after the voluntary statement they should have recovered the said ornaments. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2015 (HC)

Sharada URS and Another Vs. Bharthi URS Rani and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... for nothing and those e-mails are vulgar and nasty in nature. she has actually gone through those e-mails and handed over the same to the police but the police did not probe into those e-mails. 30.3 pw-49 ramachandra also deposed about the e-mails. he only says that he has got the information ..... and all the surrounding circumstances including the telephonic conversation, the prosecution has proved this last seen theory. further, it is contended that pw-47 shivaprakash, police constable of mangalore rural police station. he is an official witness, who has deposed that he has seen accused nos.2 and 3 soon after throwing the dead body in the ..... recorded by videograph. therefore, it is contended that in the course of cross examination of these two witnesses, they have admitted that they have given such statement before police and the said statement is true and correct. hence, it is strongly canvassed that, though they have turned hostile to the prosecution, their evidence deserves to be accepted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 1992 (HC)

Synchron Machine Tools P. Ltd. and Others Vs. U.M. Suresh Rao

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1994]79CompCas868(Kar); ILR1992KAR3329; 1992(4)KarLJ490

K.A. Swami, J.1. This petition is filed under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), for the following reliefs : '1. declare that the transfer of 25 equity shares held by Sri B. K. P. Rao (fourth respondent) in favour of his wife, Smt. B. K. Anupama Rao (third respondent), is invalid and illegal and direct that out of the said 25 shares originally held by Sri B. K. P. Rao, 12 shares be transferred to the petitioner; 2. quash the proceedings of the extraordinary general meeting of the members of the company held on November 12, 1987, and annual the resolution passed at the extraordinary general meeting of the company on November 12, 1987, declining to appoint the petitioner as director and direct that the petitioner shall continue as a wholetime director of the company with all such powers as originally conferred upon him and that he is entitled to draw remuneration as such; 3. direct amendment of the articles of association of the comp...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //