Court : Chennai
..... the first respondent and her parents. therefore, any right thinking individual would try to save his minor child out of such an imbroglio. even according to the first respondent's police complaint, she entrusted the child to the applicant on 7.11.2010, at least for a temporary period, because of the trauma that the entire family underwent due to unprecedented ..... the respondents shifted back to india in may 2010, the relationship between the first respondent and her parents got strained, leading to the first respondent filing police complaints against her own parents and her parents filing police complaints against the second respondent. it is on record that from 7.11.2010 till december 2010, the minor son became a victim of as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Prayer in S.A.No.1751 of 2004: This Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.06.2002 made in A.S.No.117 of 2001 on the file of the Learned Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 20.06.2001 made in O.S.No.103 of 1998 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Madurantakam.Prayer in S.A.No.1752 of 2004: This Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.06.2002 made in A.S.No.18 of 2002 on the file of the Learned Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 20.06.2001 made in O.S.No.103 of 1998 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Madurantakam.C O M M O N J U D G M E N T1. The Appellants/Defendants 2 and 3 have projected these Second Appeals as against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.06.2002 in A.S.No.117 of 2001 passed by the Learned Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu and also, as against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.06.2002 in A.S.No.18 of 2002 passed by the Learned...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... contains 3 parts viz., part a, part b and part c. part a contains 4 paragraphs, part b contains 25 paragraphs and part c merely relates to offences of cross border implications that may be covered by parts a and b.39. part a of the schedule to the act, covers offences under various enactments. they can be presented in a ..... 173 cr.p.c., ought to have been forwarded to a magistrate, if the offence falls within paragraph 1 of part a and part b of the schedule. alternatively, a police report or a complaint should have been filed under section 36 of the ndps act, before a special court, if the offence relates to paragraph 2 of part a of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Prayer: Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Under Clause 15 of C.P.C., against the Common Judgment dated 26.04.2005 made in C.S.No.980 of 1999 and T.O.S.No.32 of 2000 passed by this Court.COMMON JUDGMENTM.VENUGOPAL,J.O.S.A.No.125 of 2008:The Appellants/Plaintiffs have focussed the present Appeal as against the Judgment and Decree dated 26.04.2005 in C.S.No.980 of 1999 passed by the Learned Single Judge.O.S.A.No.163 of 2008:The Appellants/Defendants have preferred the present Appeal in weighing the Order dated 26.04.2005 in T.O.S.No.32 of 2000 passed by the Learned Single Judge.2.The Learned Single Judge, while passing the Common Judgment in C.S.No.980 of 1999 and T.O.S.No.32 of 2000, on 26.04.2005, has, among other things, observed that 'the Ex.P.1-Will dated 03.11.1986 executed by Ramalakshmi Ammal is a true, genuine and valid one and has come to the conclusion that Defendants 5 to 7 have purchased the property when probate was in force for valuable consider...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... be treated as public interest writ petition, at paragraphs 54 to 64, held as follows: 54. here is a case where no information has been given to the police by any informant alleging commission of any cognizable offence by the appellant and the persons associated with the appellant institution. it is a peculiar case of its own kind where ..... take such steps as he may deem fit to prevent harassment of woman and within the precinct; (b) on a complaint made by an aggrieved person, give information to the police about harassment of woman which may extend on two thousand rupees. (2) any person who fails to take action under sub-section (1) shall be liable to fine. 69 ..... hon'ble chief minister of tamil nadu, seeking protection. a complaint has been registered against the said medical officer in crime no.267 of 1997 on the file of ariyalur police station under sections 341, 352 and 506(ii) ipc. it was also alleged that the said medical officer used abusive words. though an enquiry was ordered, it was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
(Prayers: A.S.No.589 of 1994: Appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore, made in O.S.No.110 of 1991, dated 5.4.1994. CMP No.10569 of 1996: Petition under Section 107(2), CPC, to direct that the date of filing of the suit wrongly shown as 18.1.1974 in the decree be corrected as 28.1.1991. CMP No.17037 of 2000: Petition under Order 41, Rule 27, CPC, to receive as additional evidence, document marked Ex.A, registration copy of Partition Deed dated 6.2.1970, Document No.1719 of 1970 and Document marked Ex.B, registration copy of purchase document dated 15.12.1962, Document No.1927 of 1962. CRP No.3542 of 2000: Revision petition under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the order dated 27.10.2000 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge in E.P.No.97 of 2000 in I.A.No.1338 of 1995 in O.S.No.110 of 1991 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore and dismiss the aforesaid E.P.No.97 of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and the supreme court had to consider whether the mining activity up to 5 km from delhi-haryana border on haryana side of the ridge and in aravalli hills caused environmental degradation and while considering the question whether mining activity is to be absolutely banned or ..... fisherman care, a registered association as fourth respondent in the writ petition and this court suo motu impleaded the district collector, tirunelveli district and the superintendent of police, tirunelveli district as respondents 5 and 6 respectively. 2.3. as it is seen in the affidavit filed by the petitioner, there was an inter- ..... apprehend him under the national security act. likewise, and w.p.(md) no.2485 of 2012 has been filed seeking a direction against the superintendent of police, tirunelveli district to take immediate action against udayakumar, the president of kudankulam nuclear power project protest committee. 11.2. insofar as it relates to the above .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... and an outhouse in adi seshayya street, satyanarayanapuram, vijayawada, andhra pradesh. (2) a house site of about four grounds in plot no.a4a, ashok pillar road, ist avenue, (next to police quarters), kodambakkam, madras. (3) a house site of about 520 sq. yds. in yellareddiguda, hyderabad, lying to the east of smt.suryakantham's house. (4) about 1/3rd acre of ..... magistrate and also observed that the encroachment was made by mr.veda arun nagarajan or any other third party in the subject premises shall be removed by the commissioner of police greater chennai within two weeks. 20(b). the purchaser filed a civil suit in c.s.no.699 of 2009 before this court praying interim injunction against the respondents 2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.6.2013CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIANC.S.Nos.339 of 1999, 995 of 1999 and 551 of 2001andTr.C.S.Nos.2 and 3 of 2003A.Arunagiri.. Plaintiff in CS 339/1999M/s.Ramu & Co.,Represented by its Partner, B.Sudha,91, C.P.Ramasamy Road,Alwarpet, .. Plaintiff in CS 995/99 & 551/01 / Chennai-18. D3 in CS 339/99A.Thayumanaguru.. Plaintiff in Tr.CS 2/03G.Anbazhagan.. Plaintiff in Tr.CS 3/03 Vs.The Egmore Benefit Society Ltd.,No.13, Flowers Road, .. D1 in CS 339/99, 551/01,Chennai-600 084. Tr.CS 2&3/03 / D2 in CS 995/99N.M.R. Investments Pvt. Ltd.,Flat No.A1, Rams Apartments,No.3, 8th Street, Gopalapuram, .. D1 in CS 995/99 /D3 in CS 551/01 Chennai-600 086. & Tr.CS 2&3/2003Sri Raj & Co.,No.14, II Floor,Sunkurama Chetty Street, .. D2 in CS 339/99 & 551/01 &Chennai-1. D3 in CS 995/99 M/s.Ramu & Co.,91, C.P.Ramasamy Road, .. D3 in CS 339/99 / D2 in Tr.CS Alwarpet, Chennai-18. 2 & 3/03 & Plai...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... part a of the schedule of the prevention of money-laundering act, 2002 and (2) for offences specified under part c of the schedule viz., having cross border implications etc. 32.indeed, the 'offence of money-laundering' as defined under the prevention of money-laundering act, centres around the 'proceeds of crime'. 33.money ..... of sandavellore, chittoor and papankuzhi villages in and thereby cheated them to the tune of rs.27 crores. after completion of enquiries conducted by the deputy commissioner of police, central crime branch, chennai, a charge sheet was laid before the additional chief metropolitan magistrate, egmore, chennai on 25.11.2010. (iii)it transpired from the ..... the avowed object of gathering evidence during the investigation to ascertain the proceeds of crime be involved in money-laundering. further, the charge sheet laid by the police in c.c.no.88 of 2011 relates to the investigation for predicate offences committed for criminal acts and it does not relate to the 'proceeds of .....
Tag this Judgment!