Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 1 of about 34 results (0.255 seconds)

Jan 12 2017 (HC)

P.H.C.M. Gandhi, President Rica Employees Union (AITUC) Vellore Vs. Th ...

Court : Chennai

..... corporation, ex parte liverpool taxi fleet operators' association [[1972] 2 q.b.299.], the city council in exercise of its powers under the town police clauses act, 1847, limited the number of licences to be issued for hackney carriages to 300. the council gave an undertaking to the associations representing ..... correctional services, kerala. (4) the director general of police and inspector general of prisons, karnataka. (5) the director general of prisons and correctional services, telangana. (6) the director (sr), ministry of home affairs, government ..... . 2. the management of the academy is vested with the board of management of apca which consists of the following members. (1) the director general of police / inspector general of prisons, tamil nadu. (2) the director general of prisons and correctional services, andhra pradesh. (3) the director general of prisons and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2016 (HC)

Sugesan Transport Pvt.Ltd., Chennai Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of ...

Court : Chennai

..... in cases where an fir is not registered, is essential. 92. if a person who loses his vehicle comes up with the complaint to the police, the police shall issue him a csr receipt immediately. if after enquiry, it is found that the financier has not seized the vehicle and that the person had ..... cheating involving land grabbing and other offences of cheating involving huge amounts, misappropriation, kidnapping for ransom and kidnapping minor girls, etc., the police investigation is just and essential to fix and arrest the culprits and thereafter, to recover the articles and to collect the other evidence to prove the case before ..... under section 482 for the serious offence of murder, dowry death, attempt to murder, robbery, dacoity, rape and attempt to rape and only certain exceptional cases police have not taken immediate action. therefore, this court cannot brush aside the undisputed fact that even in certain other offences, namely, abetment to commit suicide, forgery, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2016 (HC)

N. Renuka Devi Vs. E. Lalitha and Another

Court : Chennai

..... . paresh charan das gupta and another): "5. the facts so far as they are material for this issue, may now be stated. the testator was a police officer and retired in 1927 as deputy superintendent of police. paresh charan, the elder son, was married in 1925, and lived all along with his parents with his wife and children. nirmala, the wife of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2014 (HC)

K.Raja Vs. C.N.Kumar

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :19. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR C.M.A.No.3508 of 2012 M.P.No.1 of 2012 1. K.Raja 2. Baby Raja ... Appellants vs.1. C.N.Kumar 2. Muthusamy Gounder 3. M.Balasubramaniam 4. P.Usharani 5. Sowmiyasankari 6. Periyasamy ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed against the judgment and decree, made in E.A.No.29 of 2010 in E.P.No.29 of 2006 in O.S.No.69 of 2000, dated 04.07.2012, on the file of the I Additional District Court, Erode. For Appellant : M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For 2nd Respondent : Mr.N.Anand Venkatesh JUDGMENT Being aggrieved by the order of dismissal on 04.07.2012, made in E.A.No.29 of 2010 in E.P.No.29 of 2006, filed under Order 21 Rule 58 of C.P.C., to release the petition mentioned properties, brought on sale from attachment, on the file of the 1st Additional District Judge, Erode, the present appeal has been filed. Parties are addressed, as per the litigative status in E.A.No.29 of 2010.2. Fa...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

M.Shobana Vs. Assistant Director at the Directorate of Enforcement

Court : Chennai

..... part a of the schedule of the prevention of money-laundering act, 2002 and (2) for offences specified under part c of the schedule viz., having cross border implications etc. 32.indeed, the 'offence of money-laundering' as defined under the prevention of money-laundering act, centres around the 'proceeds of crime'. 33.money ..... of sandavellore, chittoor and papankuzhi villages in and thereby cheated them to the tune of rs.27 crores. after completion of enquiries conducted by the deputy commissioner of police, central crime branch, chennai, a charge sheet was laid before the additional chief metropolitan magistrate, egmore, chennai on 25.11.2010. (iii)it transpired from the ..... the avowed object of gathering evidence during the investigation to ascertain the proceeds of crime be involved in money-laundering. further, the charge sheet laid by the police in c.c.no.88 of 2011 relates to the investigation for predicate offences committed for criminal acts and it does not relate to the 'proceeds of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 2013 (HC)

A.Arunagiri Vs. Egmore Benefit Society Ltd.

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.6.2013CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIANC.S.Nos.339 of 1999, 995 of 1999 and 551 of 2001andTr.C.S.Nos.2 and 3 of 2003A.Arunagiri.. Plaintiff in CS 339/1999M/s.Ramu & Co.,Represented by its Partner, B.Sudha,91, C.P.Ramasamy Road,Alwarpet, .. Plaintiff in CS 995/99 & 551/01 / Chennai-18. D3 in CS 339/99A.Thayumanaguru.. Plaintiff in Tr.CS 2/03G.Anbazhagan.. Plaintiff in Tr.CS 3/03 Vs.The Egmore Benefit Society Ltd.,No.13, Flowers Road, .. D1 in CS 339/99, 551/01,Chennai-600 084. Tr.CS 2&3/03 / D2 in CS 995/99N.M.R. Investments Pvt. Ltd.,Flat No.A1, Rams Apartments,No.3, 8th Street, Gopalapuram, .. D1 in CS 995/99 /D3 in CS 551/01 Chennai-600 086. & Tr.CS 2&3/2003Sri Raj & Co.,No.14, II Floor,Sunkurama Chetty Street, .. D2 in CS 339/99 & 551/01 &Chennai-1. D3 in CS 995/99 M/s.Ramu & Co.,91, C.P.Ramasamy Road, .. D3 in CS 339/99 / D2 in Tr.CS Alwarpet, Chennai-18. 2 & 3/03 & Plai...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2012 (HC)

C.Balakrishnan Lr.S. and Others Vs. Thittakavi Anantha Padmanabhamoort ...

Court : Chennai

..... and an outhouse in adi seshayya street, satyanarayanapuram, vijayawada, andhra pradesh. (2) a house site of about four grounds in plot no.a4a, ashok pillar road, ist avenue, (next to police quarters), kodambakkam, madras. (3) a house site of about 520 sq. yds. in yellareddiguda, hyderabad, lying to the east of smt.suryakantham's house. (4) about 1/3rd acre of ..... magistrate and also observed that the encroachment was made by mr.veda arun nagarajan or any other third party in the subject premises shall be removed by the commissioner of police greater chennai within two weeks. 20(b). the purchaser filed a civil suit in c.s.no.699 of 2009 before this court praying interim injunction against the respondents 2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2012 (HC)

G. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

..... and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and the supreme court had to consider whether the mining activity up to 5 km from delhi-haryana border on haryana side of the ridge and in aravalli hills caused environmental degradation and while considering the question whether mining activity is to be absolutely banned or ..... fisherman care, a registered association as fourth respondent in the writ petition and this court suo motu impleaded the district collector, tirunelveli district and the superintendent of police, tirunelveli district as respondents 5 and 6 respectively. 2.3. as it is seen in the affidavit filed by the petitioner, there was an inter- ..... apprehend him under the national security act. likewise, and w.p.(md) no.2485 of 2012 has been filed seeking a direction against the superintendent of police, tirunelveli district to take immediate action against udayakumar, the president of kudankulam nuclear power project protest committee. 11.2. insofar as it relates to the above .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 2012 (HC)

A. Rajalakshmi and Others Vs. Sengammal and Others

Court : Chennai

(Prayers: A.S.No.589 of 1994: Appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore, made in O.S.No.110 of 1991, dated 5.4.1994. CMP No.10569 of 1996: Petition under Section 107(2), CPC, to direct that the date of filing of the suit wrongly shown as 18.1.1974 in the decree be corrected as 28.1.1991. CMP No.17037 of 2000: Petition under Order 41, Rule 27, CPC, to receive as additional evidence, document marked Ex.A, registration copy of Partition Deed dated 6.2.1970, Document No.1719 of 1970 and Document marked Ex.B, registration copy of purchase document dated 15.12.1962, Document No.1927 of 1962. CRP No.3542 of 2000: Revision petition under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the order dated 27.10.2000 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge in E.P.No.97 of 2000 in I.A.No.1338 of 1995 in O.S.No.110 of 1991 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore and dismiss the aforesaid E.P.No.97 of ...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2012 (HC)

Bader Sayeed Vs. the Southern India Education Trust and Others

Court : Chennai

..... be treated as public interest writ petition, at paragraphs 54 to 64, held as follows: 54. here is a case where no information has been given to the police by any informant alleging commission of any cognizable offence by the appellant and the persons associated with the appellant institution. it is a peculiar case of its own kind where ..... take such steps as he may deem fit to prevent harassment of woman and within the precinct; (b) on a complaint made by an aggrieved person, give information to the police about harassment of woman which may extend on two thousand rupees. (2) any person who fails to take action under sub-section (1) shall be liable to fine. 69 ..... hon'ble chief minister of tamil nadu, seeking protection. a complaint has been registered against the said medical officer in crime no.267 of 1997 on the file of ariyalur police station under sections 341, 352 and 506(ii) ipc. it was also alleged that the said medical officer used abusive words. though an enquiry was ordered, it was .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //