Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 chapter i preliminary Page 85 of about 892 results (0.160 seconds)

Swami Ramdev & Anr. Vs.facebook, Inc. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... any attempt by the plaintiffs to seek implementation of orders passed by this hon ble court (which are undisputably based on the indian legal framework) beyond indian borders and thus, enforce indian legal standards of defamation and free speech across the world, would outright contradict critical international law presumptions of territoriality and principles of international ..... agreement, and if any content is defamatory, the same has to be taken down. intermediaries cannot be judges in their own cause and cannot attempt to police content on their own. since they do not claim any responsibility at the stage of uploading, the removal of content has to be without hesitation. if ..... knifed to death. one vasant kumar singh discovered his lifeless body shortly after and called the police. along his lifeless body shortly after and called the police. along with other neighbours, the young tarun kumar went in with the police. 'i remember it still. he was there in that dark room when i went in .....

Geep Industrial Syndicate Vs. Collector of Central Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1994)LC244Tri(Delhi)

1. This matter has come to the Tribunal as a result of Supreme Court's directions dated 13-11-1992 in Civil Appeal Nos. 2508-2509 of 1978.Relevant extracts from the same are reproduced below :- "The question before us is whether the flat forms rolled out from zinc ingots by the appellant are liable to the payment of excise duty. The description of the commodity in question given by the High Court shows that they are rough rolled flat forms. In our opinion, in order that these products can be subjected to the levy of excise duty, decision must be arrived at that these rough rolled flat forms were marketable commodities. It appears that the Tribunal and the lower authorities did not consider the evidence on record in order to determine the question whether the said products were marketable commodities. The High Court judgment clearly states that the revisional authority did not deal with the question as to whether rough rolled flat forms were marketable commodities or not. The High Cour...

Vetcare Alltech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in : (2004)(116)LC373Tri(Chennai)

..... of reference. advance licence 48. an advance licence is granted for the import of inputs without payment of basic customs duty.such licence shall be issued in accordance with the polic and procedure in force on the date of issue of the licence and shall be subject to the fulfilment of a time-bound export obligation and value addition as may .....

Madsen Vs. Women's Health Center, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... group of abortion opponents, some standing in place, others walking a picket line in an elongated oval pattern running the length of the property's south border. melbourne police officers are visible at various times walking about in front of the 787 clinic, and individuals can be seen crossing dixie way at various times. clinic supporters ..... forms of racial discrimination, began a boycott of local businesses. during the boycott, a young black man was shot and killed in an encounter with port gibson police and "sporadic acts of violence ensued." id., at 902. the following day, boycott leader charles evers told a group that boycott violators would be disciplined by ..... and congregating on the unpaved portion of that street, may, for all we know, violate some municipal ordinance (though that was not alleged, and the municipal police evidently did not seek to prevent it); but it assuredly did not violate the earlier injunction, which made no mention of such a prohibition. causing the traffic .....

United States Vs. Wells

Court : US Supreme Court

United States v. Wells - 519 U.S. 482 (1996) OCTOBER TERM, 1996 Syllabus UNITED STATES v. WELLS ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1228. Argued November 4, 1996-Decided February 26,1997 An indictment charged respondents with, inter alia, knowingly making false and "material" statements to a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U. S. C. 1014. At the trial's end, the District Court instructed the jury, at the Government's behest, that withholding a "material fact" made a statement or representation false and that materiality of an allegedly false statement was for the judge, not the jury, to determine. The jury convicted respondents, the court treated their statements as material, and they appealed. This Court then decided, in United States v. Gaudin, 515 U. S. 506 , that if materiality is an element of 1001, it is a question for the jury. When the Eighth Circuit requested supplemental briefing on Gaudin's applic...

Shaw Vs. Hunt

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , it moves southward until it tapers to a narrow band; then, with finger-like extensions, it reaches far into the southern-most part of the state near the south carolina border .... "the second majority-black district, district 12, is even more unusually shaped. it is approximately 160 miles long and, for much of its length, no wider than the [interstate]-85 .....

Timmons Vs. TwIn Cities Area New Party

Court : US Supreme Court

Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party - 520 U.S. 351 (1997) OCTOBER TERM, 1996 Syllabus TIMMONS, ACTING DIRECTOR, RAMSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY RECORDS AND REVENUE, ET AL. v. TWIN CITIES AREA NEW PARTY CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1608. Argued December 4, 1996-Decided April 28, 1997 Most States ban multiple-party, or "fusion," candidacies for elected office. Minnesota's laws prohibit an individual from appearing on the ballot as the candidate of more than one party. When respondent, a chapter of the national New Party, chose as its candidate for state representative an individual who was already the candidate of another political party, local election officials refused to accept the New Party's nominating petition. The party filed suit against petitioners, Minnesota election officials, contending that the State's antifusion laws violated its associational rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The District Co...

Mitchell Vs. Helms

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and allen had anticipated some such distinction, neither case had used the term "neutral" in this way. in everson, justice black indicated that providing 880 police, fire, and similar government services to religious institutions was permissible, in part because they were "so separate and so indisputably marked off from the religious function ..... could sensibly be described as giving it aid or violating the neutrality requirement: there was no establishment clause concern with "such general government services as ordinary police and fire protection, connections for sewage disposal, public highways and sidewalks." id., at 17-18. these "benefits of public welfare legislation," id., at ..... , not against diversion. see post, at 862, 863 (opinion concurring in judgment). content is a different matter from diversion and is much easier to police than is the mutable use of materials and equipment (which is one reason that we find the safeguards against improper content adequate, infra, at 834-835 .....

Kakarla Rosenna and Other Vs. Thammineni Narasappa and Other

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... was looking after and not given to anybody and two years after death of narayanamma only rosanna 1st defendant occupied the house by force for which he neither reported to police nor cause issued notice. he denied the suggestion that, narayanamma gave all her properties to rosanna, 1st defendant, under adoption deed (ex.b-1 dated 13.11 ..... to mangamma and balappa and rosanna was never adopted by rangappa and narayanamma and while he was cultivating the property in the year 1973 rosanna along with some police came and obstructed and they filed o.s. no.274 of 1973 and obtained temporary injunction against rosanna and against the suit dismissal he filed appeal covered by ..... of property by paying taxes in her name being its owner subject to the gifts by retaining life time possession and enjoyment. 1st defendant rosanna stated that after police complaint was given under ex.b-1, the suit filed was within 2 months and to say that his undertaking/statement was obtained by coersion, there is no .....

Verma Roadways Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Reported in : (2000)75ITD183(All.)

1. In this appeal, against the order of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Investigation), Kanpur, dated 28-11-1997, the assessee has challenged the assessment for the block period, completed under the provisions of Chapter XIVB of the Income-tax Act. The block period is from 1-4-1994 to 28-11-1996.2. This appeal was heard on priority basis as directed by the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The Hon'ble Court, vide its order dated 23-7-1999, has directed the Tribunal to decide the appeal by 15th September, 1999.3. In the grounds of appeal, initially, the assessee took as many as 46 grounds. As many of these grounds were argumentative in nature, an objection was filed on behalf of the Department on 19-4-1999 alleging that these grounds being in the nature of written arguments, either should not be allowed, or in the alternative, the assessee should not be allowed to make arguments, simultaneously.4. The appellant moved an application for admitting additional grounds.Th...