Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 chapter i preliminary Page 79 of about 892 results (0.199 seconds)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. R.C. Bhargava

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Reported in : (1999)95CompCas394

..... of investigation (cbi) has filed charge-sheets in two cases in the court of the special judge, delhi, who has taken cognizance thereof. in the third case, the superintendent of police, cbi, has submitted his report after investigation, and launching of prosecution, according to the applicant, is under consideration. the fourth case is still under investigation of the cbi and in .....

Hpl (India) Limited & Ors vs.qrg Enterprises and Another

Court : Delhi

..... present case, the impugned order is admittedly not one specified under order xliii.31. we would also like to examine the scope and function of a proviso . in cit v. indo-mercantile bank ltd:1959. supp (2) scr256 the supreme court held:-" the proper function of a proviso is that it qualifies the generality of the main enactment by providing an .....

Salazar Vs. Ramah Navajo Chapter

Court : US Supreme Court

Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, etal. v. RAMAH NAVAJO CHAPTER etal. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit No. 11551.Argued April 18, 2012Decided June 18, 2012 The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDA) directs the Secretary of the Interior to enter into contracts with willing tribes under which they will provide services such as education and law enforcement that the Federal Government otherwise would have provided. It requires the Secretary to contract to pay the full amount of contract...

The Registrar, University of Madras and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)2MLJ367

Srinivasan, J.1. Broadly stated, two contentions are mainly urged in this batch of writ petitions, one relating to the validity of some of the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Act No. 68 of 1986), (hereinafter called 'the Act') and the other relating to the applicability of the Act to imparting of education and matters connected therewith. It is only in W.P. No. 6447 of 1993 a prayer is made for declaration that Sections 10(1)(b) and (c), 13(3), (4) and (5), 14(1)(c), 16(1)(b), 20(1)(b)) and 27 and other provisions of the Act as unconstitutional, ultra vires and unenforceable. In all the other writ petitions the prayer is for either issue of writ of prohibition prohibiting the Consumer Forum from dealing with the specified complaints or for issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records and quash the orders passed by the Consumer Forum on specified complaints.2. The petitions can be classified into three Groups:A. Writ Petitions filed by Educational Institutions:...

Amr Dev Prabha Through Its Power of Attorney Holder Mithilesh Kumar Si ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... validity of the decision of the committee taken on the material available at the time of consideration of tenders, cannot be tested with reference to a subsequent police enquiry report submitted in the writ proceedings. nor can it be held that the committee acted arbitrarily in not accepting the passbook, on the basis of ..... decision making process can be examined by the court, though the decision is not amenable to judicial review. in the case of dutta associates pvt. ltd. vs. indo merchantiles pvt. ltd. & others reported in (1997) 1 scc53(supra), it was held that the consideration of the tender received and the procedure to be followed ..... others reported in (2007) 2 scc640 himachal pradesh housing and urban development authority vs. universal estate and anr reported in (2010) 14 scc253 dutta associates pvt. ltd. vs. indo merchantiles pvt. ltd. & others reported in (1997) 1 scc53 b. s. minhas vs. indian statistical institute & others reported in (1983) 4 scc582 roots industries india ltd. .....

All India Shaw Wallace Employees Vs. Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Reported in : (2000)102CompCas466

1. The affairs of Shaw Wallace Ltd. (SWC), a blue chip company, with a history of over hundred years, presently under the control of an NRI M.R. Chhabria, (MRC), holding about 39 per cent. shares in the company for nearly a decade and under whose management this company was doing well for some time, have unfortunately become the subject-matter of two petitions-one filed under Sections 235, 237, 397, 398, 399, 402, 403, 406 and 408 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) by some of the employee shareholders (first petition) and another, under Section 408 of the Act, by the Central Government (second petition). Both the petitions were heard together, as most of the allegations in both the petitions are founded on certain alleged acts of financial mismanagement and there were quite a few common allegations. To avoid repetition and overlapping, we are disposing of these two petitions by this single common order.2. There are 61 respondents in the first petition of whom replies have been filed onl...

Dharambir Khattar Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

..... be protected by the court against wrongful and highhanded interference by tapping the conversation, the protection is not for the guilty citizen against the efforts of the police to vindicate the law and prevent corruption of public servants. the supreme court referred to the decision in kuruma, son of kanju v. r.:1955. ac ..... citizen to be imperilled by permitting the police to proceed by unlawful or irregular methods. in the present case there is no unlawful or even irregular method in obtaining the tape-recording of the conversation ..... will be protected by courts against wrongful or highhanded interference by tapping the conversation. the protection is not for the guilty citizen against the efforts of the police to vindicate the law and prevent corruption of public servants. it must not be understood that the courts will tolerate safeguards for the protection of the .....

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA. Vs. Casey

Court : US Supreme Court

..... .... the battering husband may deny parentage and use the pregnancy as an excuse for abuse .... "290. secrecy typically shrouds abusive families. family members are instructed not to tell anyone, especially police or doctors, about the abuse and violence. battering husbands often threaten their wives or her children with further abuse if she tells an outsider of the violence and tells her ..... protected interest is merely the beginning of the analysis. state regulation of travel and of marriage is obviously permissible even though a state may not categorically exclude nonresidents from its borders, shapiro v. thompson, 394 u. s. 618 , 631 (1969), or deny prisoners the right to marry, turner v. safley, 482 u. s. 78 , 94-99 (1987). but the regulation of .....

Morales Vs. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. - 504 U.S. 374 (1992) OCTOBER TERM, 1991 Syllabus MORALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 90-1604. Argued March 3, 1992-Decided June 1, 1992 In order to ensure that the States would not undo the anticipated benefits of federal deregulation of the airline industry, the pre-emption provision of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA) prohibits them from enforcing any law "relating to [air carriers'] rates, routes, or services." 49 U. S. C. App. 1305(a)(1). Mter the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) adopted guidelines that contain detailed standards governing, inter alia, the content and format of airline fare advertising, and that purport to be enforceable through the States' general consumer protection statutes, petitioner's predecessor as Attorney General of Texas sent notices of intent to sue to enforce the guid...

Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. the Principle Secretary and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... left out matching the acreage of the changed area with the acreage area of the block allocated to them. it was pointed out by cmpdil that the area between orissa border and block boundary which has been covered by m/s. jindal steel and power ltd., could not form an independent block and should have been included earlier in the area ..... that m/s. jindal steel & power limited had shifted the area of the block to cover an adjoining area containing a coal reserve of about 15 million tonne between the border of the state of orissa and block boundary which is in the state of chhattisgarh. on the other side, a portion of the block containing a reserve of about 36 .....