Court : Kerala
Reported in : AIR1980Ker109
Subramonian Poti, J. 1. A question of some importance arises for decision in this case. It concerns the consequence of the repeal by Section 7 of the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 of the Acts mentioned in the Schedule. One of the Acts so repealed is the Travancore Nair Act 2 of 1100. That Act provides among other things, for dissolution of a marriage solemnised under the Act. It specifies grounds for dissolution of marriage and also prescribes the procedure by which the right to seek dissolution is to be exercised. The court to which proceedings would lie is also specified. The Hindu Marriage Act 1955 provides in Section 13, for dissolution of Hindu Marriages. The grounds for dissolution are specified in this Act and the procedure for seeking dissolution is also specified in the Act. The grounds for dissolution under the Hindu Marriages Act are not identical with the grounds for divorce in the Nair Act 1100.2. Notwithstanding the commencement of the Hindu Marri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1994Kant256; ILR1994KAR687
ORDER1. The petition was listed in the preliminary hearing Group 'B'. By consent of the counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard on merits and disposed offinally.This petition is presented by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 31-5-1993 passed by the first respondent in Order No. HUD 109 CUP 92 (Annexure-S) on the ground that the same is illegal and without the authority of law having been made in violation of the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short 'the Act'), besides being arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.2. The petitioner has further sought for a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to take action under Section 20(2) of the Act by taking over the entire land in Sy. Nos. 97/2 and 98 of Yeshwanthpur, Bangalore on the ground that the land in question is in excess of the ceiling limit and for a further direction to 6th respondent to retain the entire land for the company for its expansion...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : [1999]97CompCas582(Mad); 1998(3)CTC589
ORDER1. All these eight appeals arise out of the orders passed by the Company Law Board, Principal Bench, New Delhi in two company petitions, namely, C.P.No. 45 of 1993 and C.P.No. 16 of 1994, dated 12.5.1998.2. C.M.A.Nos. 1071, 1207, 1208 and 1210 of 1998 are preferred against the order in C.P.No.16 of 1994, while C.M.A.Nos.1072, 1073, 1149 and 1209 are preferred against the order in C.P.No.45 of 1993. The main dispute relates to the affairs of M/s. Gordon Woodroffe & Company Limited (GWL), a sick company now before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) In C.M.A.No.1071 of 1998, M/s. Gordon Woodroffe & Company Limited, U.K. the petitioner in C.P.No.16 of 1994 is the appellant. In C.M.A.No.1207 of 1998, Kishore Rajaram Chhabria, Madan Dwarakdas Chhabria and Rajaram Dwarakdas Chhabria, the respondents 4 to 6 in C.P.No.16 of 1994 are the appellants. In C.M.A.No.1208 of 1998, Tracstar Investments (P) Ltd., the second respondent in C.P.No.16 of 1994 is the appellant....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1991(3)ALT433
..... officer or managing committee appointed under section 34 or a liquidator appointed under section 65 of the act, may assume charge in a particular manner with the assistance of the police, if such person, officer, committee or liquidator is resisted in or prevented from doing so. no such procedure is adopted in these cases. no requisition was made of the erstwhile .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2383A; (2000)2UPLBEC1387
R. R. K. Trivedi, J.1. Petitioner No. 1, it is claimed, is an association of advocates and petitioner Nos. 2 and 3, who are the advocates practising in High Court, have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution questioning the legality of Rules dated 4.2.2000 by which Designation of Senior Advocates Rules. 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) have been amended. It has been prayed that amending Rules be declared ultra vires. Inoperative, null and void. It has also been prayed that respondents be restrained from designating 'Senior Advocates' in pursuance of impugned Rules. Second relief sought is that respondent No. 1 be directed to consider the advocates practising in District Courts for being designated as senior advocates. It has also been prayed that recommendations made by the Screening Committee on 6.3.2000 and 30.3.2000 may be quashed.2. Under Rule 9 of Chapter III of the Rules of the Court Hon'ble the Chief Justice called a Full Court meeting to be he...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (1995)ILLJ978Raj
1. The above six revision petitions have arisen out of the various claims made by the petitioner Mohammed Ayub against the Firm M/s. Mohammed & Sons complaining against alleged illegal deductions of wages and bonus for different periods which according to him was payable to him. All the applications of the petitioner have been dismissed by the Authority under Payment of Wages Act, Bikaner (hereinafter to be called 'the Authority'), on the ground that dispute raised in the proceedings required determination of complicated question of fact and law which the Authority having limited jurisdiction, has no jurisdiction to decide. The orders passed by the Authority have been affirmed by the District Judge, Merta in appeals filed against respective orders of the Authority. Detail particulars of the claims and orders will be referred to hereinafter.2. Since question involved in all the revision petitions is common, arising out of the same set of facts and between the same parties, all the six r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Himachal Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1996HP38
..... department which show in correct relative position certain convenient points (chandas) or corner of squares which have been fixed by a skeleton traverse survey run along or over the tract bordering both banks of the rivers concerned (paragraph 251). in addition, as per paragraph 256 pertaining to procedure in case of complete re-measurement, the existing instructions as to the procedure ..... of tibet to the northern region.28. this pradesh, having become a full fledged state on 25th january, 1971, is one of the most picturesque regions of the country. its border districts of kinnaur and lahaul-spiti have international common boundary with tibet in the east and thus, this state has strategic importance because of its hills in the south-east .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3531
..... or executive in the district of allahabad, aligarh. lucknow or fatehpur and he shall accept the surrender irrespective of enquiry about the offence or absence thereof. he shall inform the police officer concerned of the area in which he is living who in his turn arrange for taking custody of the person of the petitioner and keep him in protective custody .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : [1995]82CompCas203(P& H)
..... to this litigation to raise objections, seriously contests the first contention and styles the same not only impermissible in the facts and circumstances of the case but also one which borders on a plea that can be well termed dishonest. the facts and circumstances that are available, however, in my considered view, debar the objectors from asking for acceptance of objections .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... ii. (1979) 4 scc 229 iii. (2009) 1 scc 516 iv.(1999) 6 scc 667 v. 1999 crl.l.j. 3909 7. the learned counsel for lokayukta police would submit that the impugned reference under section 156(3) cr.p.c. does not call for interference. 8. the ii respondent/party-in-person has made following submissions:- i ..... to petitioner herein. 2. i have heard sri uday u.lalit. learned senior counsel for petitioner. sri s.g.rajendra reddy. learned counsel for i-respondent/lokayukta police and ii respondent/party-in- person sri t.j.abraham. 3. the brief facts necessary for decision of this petition are as follows:- a complaint under section 200 ..... even there is no definition of "first information report" and "first informant". under section 17 of the prevention of corruption act. 1988. certain police officers in the case of delhi special police establishment, in metropolitan areas and elsewhere are notified and they have been empowered to investigate into the matter, without the order of magistrate and they are .....
Tag this Judgment!