Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 chapter i preliminary Page 7 of about 892 results (0.358 seconds)

Aug 03 2005 (HC)

Superintendent of Police, C.B.i. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(3)KLT823

..... and tortured by the petitioners in furtherance of the common intention of extorting a confession implicating sri somarajan, d.i.g. of police, sri. chandran, superintendent of police, and other police officers. when the second respondent was produced before the magistrate, he told the magistrate what had actually happened and the learned magistrate ..... made any complaint of ill-treatment or torture before the chief judicial magistrate or before the doctors who examined him on seven occasions while in police custody. it is contended that he had filed one bail application before the chief judicial magistrate, three bail applications before the sessions court, ernakulam ..... quashing annexure no. xx complaint filed by the second respondent and also annexure xxi first information report registered by the sub inspector of police, ernakulam town north police station in pursuance of that complaint.2. in the criminal miscellaneous case it was averred that the second respondent is the second accused .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 1997 (HC)

K.V. Amarnath and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR730; 1998(5)KarLJ62

..... the constitution is to endeavour to bring about prohibition of the consumption except for medicinal purposes all intoxicating drugs and drugs which are injurious to health. the state has the police power to enforce public morality to prohibit trade in noxious or dangerous goods. 49. learned advocate general appearing for the respondents has produced a file bearing no. fd 325 edc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2009 (HC)

A.P. Civil Liberties Committee (Apclc) Rep. by Its President, Mr. S. S ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(1)ALT754

..... to attribute any specific overt act to any individual.281. in the light of such declaration of the legal principle, the issue whether the state/police establishment/police officer enjoys any immunity from the obligation to disclose the identity does not really survive for consideration. it is an established principle of curial discipline that ..... party, if it were interpreted that section 154(1) cr.p.c. obligates the recording and registration of a culpable offence against the involved police officers, the police force would be demoralized and subjected to the avoidable jeopardy and the trauma of investigation or trial. this is broadly the justification presented by the ..... but grave injury to a person; and in w.p. no. 14475 of 2002), the generic factual narrative is that on credible information received a police (special police) party was deputed to a rendezvous where some extremist elements are believed to have gathered for the purpose of planning/executing extremist activities. on reaching .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 2008 (HC)

Smt. Pulimi Sailaja Reddy Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Its Secretary, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2009AP59; 2009(1)ALT684

..... the petitioner has been assaulted by some of the lady corporators, which has been reported in the local edition of the newspaper on 18-4-2008. the petitioner filed a police case complaining about assault on her. the 3rd respondent went on reporting to the press as evident from the report in the newspapers, dated 20-4-2008 that the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2004 (SC)

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

..... such person- (i) who is subject to the army act, 1950 or the air force act, 1950, or the navy (discipline) act,1934; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison; or (iii)who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity; or (iv) who, being employed in a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 1995 (HC)

Dhanpalsingh Barunsingh Thakur and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3751; (1996)1GLR219

..... excise, narcotic, customs, revenue, intelligence or any other department of the central government or an officer of similar superior rank of the revenue, drugs control, excise, police or any other department of a state government as is empowered in this behalf by general or special order of the state government. such officer, if he has ..... a peon, sepoy or constable) of the departments of central excise, narcotic, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the border security force as is empowered in this behalf by general or special order by the central government, or any such officer (being an officer superior in rank to ..... of gazetted rank of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue, intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the border security force as is empowered in this behalf by general or special order by the central government, or any such officer of the revenue, drugs, control, excise .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2012 (HC)

A.Kamarunnisa Ghori. Vs. the Chairperson Prevention of Money Launderin ...

Court : Chennai

..... contains 3 parts viz., part a, part b and part c. part a contains 4 paragraphs, part b contains 25 paragraphs and part c merely relates to offences of cross border implications that may be covered by parts a and b.39. part a of the schedule to the act, covers offences under various enactments. they can be presented in a ..... 173 cr.p.c., ought to have been forwarded to a magistrate, if the offence falls within paragraph 1 of part a and part b of the schedule. alternatively, a police report or a complaint should have been filed under section 36 of the ndps act, before a special court, if the offence relates to paragraph 2 of part a of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 1996 (HC)

Ramachandrappa and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1996KAR3369; 1996(7)KarLJ242

R.P. Sethi, CJ.1. Claiming to be still in lawful possession and enjoying their lands, the subject matter of acquisition proceedings on the basis of notification No. LAQ(1) SR 25/86-87 the appellants filed Writ Petitions in this Court praying for quashing the aforesaid notification and declaration. They also prayed that the acquisition proceedings be declared to have lapsed on the grounds detailed in the Writ Petition. it was submitted that as the impugned notification was issued by the Special Deputy Commissioner who had not been specially appointed to perform the functions of Deputy Commissioner as contemplated under Section 3(C) of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter called 'the Act'), the impugned notification passed by him being without jurisdiction was void-ab-initio. The Special Land Acquisition Officer was also alleged to have not been specially appointed to perform the functions of Deputy Commissioner under the Act, all proceedings conducted by him were illegal in their entir...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2000 (HC)

Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Vs. Vijay Owners Association

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2000)3GLR2505

..... 93 under section 267 of the act which was served to the plaintiff on 8.11.93, calling upon the plaintiff to stop the unauthorised construction. police inspector of navrangpura police station was also requested in this behalf. despite the prohibitory order served on the plaintiff, the plaintiff continued illegal activities of unauthorised construction. it is ..... in numerous decisions has held that no consideration should be shown to the builder or any other person where construction is unauthorised. this dicta is now almost bordering the rule of law. stress was laid by the appellant and the prospective allottees of the shops to exercise judicial discretion in moulding the relief such a ..... to be visited by number of people which would lead to abnormal movement of traffic and that really causes the problems for the residents of ahmedabad. neither police is able to manage nor the corporation is able to manage in this regard.29. every year government is collecting crores of rupees by way of vehicles .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 1996 (HC)

Natraj Chhabigrih, Sigra Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All375

..... that section 29-a itself was struck down. subsequently, r.s. joshi v. ajit mills ltd. : [1978]1scr338 . set aside its earlier decision in ashoka marketing ltd. (supra). later in indo international industries v. state of u. p., 1983 uptc 1195 : (1981 tax lr 2902) (all), learned single judge held in view of r.s. joshi's case : [1978]1scr338 (supra .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //