Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 chapter i preliminary Court: chennai Page 4 of about 34 results (0.243 seconds)

Mar 18 1993 (HC)

M. Shanmugha Udayar Vs. Sivanandam and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1993)2MLJ617

..... in the village of kakupparm, 19 acres in erumanthangal, 16 acres in maharajapuram and 12 acres in kilpe-rumbakkam cultivated therein sugarcane crops. he also did building contract work for police department and road contract for highways department. he was also a railway contractor. as per the terms of ex.a-1 partition deed the mother of the appellant was in ..... of these contract works. but admittedly he did these works prior to 1932. later on he changes his stand and deposes that he did a number of contract works in police department and highways department subsequent to 1932. he was getting annually rs. 8,000 to rs. 10,000 from those works. for about 6 or 7 years from 1944 he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 2013 (HC)

A.Arunagiri Vs. Egmore Benefit Society Ltd.

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.6.2013CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIANC.S.Nos.339 of 1999, 995 of 1999 and 551 of 2001andTr.C.S.Nos.2 and 3 of 2003A.Arunagiri.. Plaintiff in CS 339/1999M/s.Ramu & Co.,Represented by its Partner, B.Sudha,91, C.P.Ramasamy Road,Alwarpet, .. Plaintiff in CS 995/99 & 551/01 / Chennai-18. D3 in CS 339/99A.Thayumanaguru.. Plaintiff in Tr.CS 2/03G.Anbazhagan.. Plaintiff in Tr.CS 3/03 Vs.The Egmore Benefit Society Ltd.,No.13, Flowers Road, .. D1 in CS 339/99, 551/01,Chennai-600 084. Tr.CS 2&3/03 / D2 in CS 995/99N.M.R. Investments Pvt. Ltd.,Flat No.A1, Rams Apartments,No.3, 8th Street, Gopalapuram, .. D1 in CS 995/99 /D3 in CS 551/01 Chennai-600 086. & Tr.CS 2&3/2003Sri Raj & Co.,No.14, II Floor,Sunkurama Chetty Street, .. D2 in CS 339/99 & 551/01 &Chennai-1. D3 in CS 995/99 M/s.Ramu & Co.,91, C.P.Ramasamy Road, .. D3 in CS 339/99 / D2 in Tr.CS Alwarpet, Chennai-18. 2 & 3/03 & Plai...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

M.Shobana Vs. Assistant Director at the Directorate of Enforcement

Court : Chennai

..... part a of the schedule of the prevention of money-laundering act, 2002 and (2) for offences specified under part c of the schedule viz., having cross border implications etc. 32.indeed, the 'offence of money-laundering' as defined under the prevention of money-laundering act, centres around the 'proceeds of crime'. 33.money ..... of sandavellore, chittoor and papankuzhi villages in and thereby cheated them to the tune of rs.27 crores. after completion of enquiries conducted by the deputy commissioner of police, central crime branch, chennai, a charge sheet was laid before the additional chief metropolitan magistrate, egmore, chennai on 25.11.2010. (iii)it transpired from the ..... the avowed object of gathering evidence during the investigation to ascertain the proceeds of crime be involved in money-laundering. further, the charge sheet laid by the police in c.c.no.88 of 2011 relates to the investigation for predicate offences committed for criminal acts and it does not relate to the 'proceeds of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2014 (HC)

K.Raja Vs. C.N.Kumar

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :19. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR C.M.A.No.3508 of 2012 M.P.No.1 of 2012 1. K.Raja 2. Baby Raja ... Appellants vs.1. C.N.Kumar 2. Muthusamy Gounder 3. M.Balasubramaniam 4. P.Usharani 5. Sowmiyasankari 6. Periyasamy ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed against the judgment and decree, made in E.A.No.29 of 2010 in E.P.No.29 of 2006 in O.S.No.69 of 2000, dated 04.07.2012, on the file of the I Additional District Court, Erode. For Appellant : M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For 2nd Respondent : Mr.N.Anand Venkatesh JUDGMENT Being aggrieved by the order of dismissal on 04.07.2012, made in E.A.No.29 of 2010 in E.P.No.29 of 2006, filed under Order 21 Rule 58 of C.P.C., to release the petition mentioned properties, brought on sale from attachment, on the file of the 1st Additional District Judge, Erode, the present appeal has been filed. Parties are addressed, as per the litigative status in E.A.No.29 of 2010.2. Fa...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //