Skip to content


Indirection - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: indirection Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 891 results (0.015 seconds)
Oct 27 2003 (TRI)

Sms Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Oct-27-2003

Reported in: (2004)49SCL117SAT

..... that anybody acquiring control over the holding company acquires control of its subsidiary also that indirect acquisition of control also attracts regulation 12 and therefore with the acquisition of control ..... of foreign companies that its scope is restricted to takeover of indian companies but indirect takeover of indian companies is covered by the regulations learned counsel referred to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2003 (TRI)

Detergents India Ltd., Shaw Vs. Cce and Detergents India Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Apr-22-2003

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC165

..... than forcing the department to infer such a meaning in an indirect and circuitous manner no doubt they were filing the various returns ..... by virtue of that circumstance to have any interest direct or indirect in the business of atul product limited atul product limited ..... of the assessee and it has therefore no interest direct or indirect in the business of the assessee it is imperial chemical industries .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 22 2003 (TRI)

Starchik Specialities Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on: Jul-22-2003

Reported in: (2004)90ITD34(Hyd.)

..... directors sitting fee 8 000m finance charges 14 86 421 proportionate indirect cost allowable to export turnover works out to export turnover ..... excluded for the purposes of working out the proportion of indirect costs attributable to the exports in the ratio of the ..... account in other words the assessee has artificially ignored the indirect costs relatable to the manufacturing division it is not a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2003 (TRI)

In Re: Nrb Bearings India Limited;

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: May-29-2003

..... regulations seeking exemption from the provisions of chapter iii of the regulations in respect of indirect acquisition of the target company and snl in the aforesaid application dated december 20 ..... registered in india only whether listed or unlisted rather it should be interpreted to include indirect acquisition of shares voting rights control of target companies through acquisition of even foreign .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2003 (FN)

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-10-2003

..... the dividing line between expenditures that are coordinated and therefore may be regulated as indirect contributions and expenditures that truly are independent we repeatedly have struck down limitations ..... or not incorporated organized and operated primarily for the purpose of directly or indirectly accepting contributions or making expenditures for the purpose of influencing or attempting to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 09 2003 (TRI)

Sebi Vs. Ondel Nalco India Limited

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Apr-09-2003

..... combined reading of the regulation 12 with regulation 2 b it is clear that the indirect acquisition of control including acquisitions through the chain of subsidiaries would attract the provisions of ..... contention of the acquirer is not tenable since provisions of the regulations cover cases of indirect acquisition of target companies by virtue of acquisition of holding companies whether in india or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 29 2003 (TRI)

Luxottica Group Spa, Ray Ban Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Indi ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Aug-29-2003

Reported in: (2004)1CompLJ258SAT

..... logical to impose open offer requirements if the overseas offer restructuring which might result in indirect change in control in indiana target company fails regarding conditional offer for less than ..... decisions exercisable by a person or persons acting individually or in concert directly or indirectly including by virtue of their share holding or management rights or share holders agreements .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 2003 (SC)

Hira Lal Hari Lal Bhagwati Vs. C.B.i., New Delhi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-02-2003

Reported in: AIR2003SC2545; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)292; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)142; 2003(51)BLJR1697; 2003CriLJ3041; 2003(3)CTC356; (2003)182CTR(SC)1; 104(2003)DLT699(SC); 2003(87)ECC473; 2003(155)ELT4

..... thedeclarant from instituting any proceeding for prosecution for anyoffence under any direct tax enactment or indirect tax enactment 8 we may notice that a certificate issued under section 90 1 kvss ..... enactment a in a case where prosecution for any offencepunishable under any provisions of any indirect taxenactment has been instituted on or before the dateof filing of the declaration under section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 2003 (TRI)

Kishore Rajaram Chhabria Vs. the Chairman Securities and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Aug-01-2003

Reported in: (2003)46SCL385SAT

..... clause i and ii his associatesmutual funds financial institutions merchant bankers portfolio manager and any indirect company in which any person has an interest as director fund manager transfer or as ..... 1 1997 mr chidambaram submitted that the 1994 regulations did not cover the concept of indirect acquisition of a company through acquisition of unlisted investment companies which was a possible .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 2003 (TRI)

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Decided on: Feb-28-2003

Reported in: (2005)93ITD184(Nag.)

..... have considered the rival submissions we find that the members are not either directly or indirectly chosen by the inhabitants of the vidharba region element of popular representation of the ..... includes the expenses incurred on test runs and experimental production is usually capitalized as an indirect element of construction cost as per these foregoing provisions vidc has completely capitalized its .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //