Indigency - Judgments | SooperKanoon

Jun 10 1976 (FN)

United States Vs. Maccollom

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-10-1976

..... his conviction and remained available on the conditions set forth in 753 to an indigent proceeding under 2255 afforded respondent an adequate opportunity to attack his conviction to ..... on direct appeal so far diminishes the importance of collateral review that discrimination between indigent and nonindigent in post conviction proceedings is constitutionally tolerable that argument is implicitly if .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 18 1963 (FN)

Douglas Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-18-1963

..... conviction we need not now decide whether california would have to provide counsel for an indigent seeking a discretionary hearing from the california supreme court after the district court of ..... to keep within reasonable bounds the instances in which appellate counsel will be assigned to indigents the states of course are prohibited by the equal protection clause from discriminating between rich .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 12 1972 (FN)

James Vs. Strange

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-12-1972

..... proceedings may protect the state from fraudulent concealment of assets and false assertions of indigency many states moreover face expanding criminal dockets and this court has required appointed counsel ..... state interests but these interests are not thwarted by requiring more even treatment of indigent criminal defendants with other classes of debtors to whom the statute itself repeatedly makes .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 1974 (FN)

Memorial Hosp. Vs. Maricopa County

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-26-1974

..... the purposes asserted as justification for the requirement fiscal savings inhibiting migration of indigents generally deterring indigents from taking up residence in the county solely to utilize the medical ..... many there who suffer from asthma bronchitis arthritis and tuberculosis many coming are indigent or become indigent after arrival arizona does not deny medical help to emergency cases when .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 07 1996 (FN)

M. L. B. Vs. S. L. J.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-07-1996

..... hearing that she was unfit to remain her children s mother not because she was indigent her indigency only prevented her from tak 138 ing advantage of procedures above and beyond those ..... differentiation is not treated as an invidious classification by the state even though discrimination against indigents by name would be unconstitutional ibid justice harlan offered the example of a state university .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 2004 (FN)

Kowalski Vs. Tesmer

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-13-2004

..... be by leave of the court several state judges denied appointed appellate counsel to indigents pleading guilty and the michigan legislature subsequently codified this practice the two attorney ..... court to short circuit the state s adjudication of the constitutional question here the indigents were appropriately dismissed under younger because they had ample opportunities to raise their constitutional .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 17 1974 (FN)

Ross Vs. Moffitt

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-17-1974

..... the fourteenth amendment does not require north carolina to provide counsel for a convicted indigent defendant seeking to file a petition for certiorari in this court under circumstances ..... the rights of its citizens ibid chief judge haynsworth also correctly observed that the indigent defendant proceeding without counsel is at a substantial disadvantage relative to wealthy defendants represented .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 05 1999 (FN)

Smith Vs. Robbins

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-05-1999

..... disclaimed any pretensions to rulemaking authority for the states in the area of indigent criminal appeals we imposed no broad rule or procedure but merely held unconstitutional ..... that far from guaranteeing adequate appellate representation for all criminal defendants instead ensures that indigent criminal defendants will receive mediocre appellate representation whether their claims are good or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 2012 (HC)

Kadeeja Umma Vs. State of Kerala, Represented by District Collector. P ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-28-2012

..... application accompanied by a memorandum of appeal and may be allowed to appeal as an indigent person subject in all matters including the presentation of such applications to the provisions ..... pay the requisite court fee to present an application seeking permission to appeal as an indigent person with regard to all other procedural aspects regarding such application for permission the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 22 2013 (HC)

Nand Kishore Sharma Vs. Delhi Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Ani ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-22-2013

..... application accompanied by a memorandum of appeal and may be allowed to appeal as an indigent person subject in all matters including the presentation of such application to the provisions relating ..... applicant was refused permission to institute the suit from which this appeal arises as an indigent person whether on account of the failure of appellant applicant to produce the documents which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Indigency - Judgment Search Results