Indifferently - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: indifferently Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 54 results (0.006 seconds)P. Vs. P. and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-11-1981
Reported in: AIR1983Bom8; 1982(1)BomCR236
..... joon v tara wati air1980delhi213 wherein it is observed 7 cruelty means delight in or indifference to pain or misery in others it connotes acts which give unnecessary pain to other ..... strikes with a sharper edge than conduct which is the consequence of mere obtuseness or indifference gollins v gollins 1964 ac 644 670 688 689 is it necessary to enquire into .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA Vs. B
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-10-1981
Reported in: 1982(1)BomCR236a
..... singh joan v tarawati air1980delhi213 wherein it is observed 17 cruelty means delight in or indifference to pain or misery in others it connotes acts which give unnecessary pain to others ..... strikes with a sharper edge than conduct which is the consequence of mere obtuseness or indifference collins v collins 1965 a c 644 it is necessary to enquire into motives and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRhodes Vs. Chapman
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-15-1981
..... isolated incidents of failure to provide medical or dental care there was no evidence of indifference by the socf staff to inmates medical or dental needs footnote 6 as to violence ..... outward manifestations of a deeper dysfunction an attitude of cynicism hopelessness predatory selfishness and callous indifference that appears to infect to one degree or another almost everyone who comes in contact .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHodel Vs. Virginia Surface Mining
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-15-1981
..... territory the only question is of size the law is not indifferent to considerations of degree activities local in their immediacy do not ..... the underlying thought is merely this that the law is not indifferent to considerations of degree schechter poultry corp v united states supra ..... concurring opinion p 295 u s 554 it cannot be indifferent to them without an expansion of the commerce clause that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBadre Alam Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-17-1981
Reported in: 1982CriLJ132
..... right to make a representation is neither high handedness nor mean mindedness but the casual indifference the mindless in sensibilitty the routine and red tape of bureaucratic machine the procedure ..... prescribed for making a representation is aimed at shielding personal freedom against indifference insensibility routine and red tape and to secure to the detenu to make an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.K. Arora Vs. S.L. Sarna
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Delhi205; 20(1981)DLT480
..... transfer to our delhi office to enable to lookafter your aged parents who are keeping indifferent health we have also discussed this matter with you as explained to you we shall ..... transfer him to delhi to enable him to lookafter his aged parents who are keeping indifferent health and the fact that his transfer was under consideration subject to the rider that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVirendra Kumar Nayak Vs. the Superintendent of Naini Central Jail and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-17-1981
Reported in: 1982CriLJ1
..... law relating to preventive detention for making representation is aimed at shielding personal freedom against indifference insensibility routine and red tape expedition is essential at every stage however the time ..... depending on the necessities of the case but no allowance can be made for lethargic indifference no allowance can be made for needless procrastination but allowance must surely be made .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Assam and ors. Vs. Naresh Chandra Das and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-19-1981
..... liberal view should be taken merely because the defaulting party is govt g even sheer indifference of the advocate cannot stand in the way of condoning the delay when there is ..... office of the senior government advocate the litigants cannot be penalised for the neglect or indifference of their employees it is impossible to hold that it was a device to cover .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.G. Srinivasa Murthy, Etc., Etc. Vs. Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. Etc., E ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-17-1981
Reported in: ILR1982KAR622; (1982)ILLJ268Kant
..... absence upto 30 5 81 was covered by medical certificate 3 this officer s attendance indifferent attitude to work lack of ability and other traits required of an officer have slowly ..... reports referred to therein reveal that a shri t g srinivasamurthy asst stores officer is indifferent and lacks devotion to his duty b though he puts in attendance he is not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSirajmohmedkhan Janmohamadkhan Vs. Hafizunnisa Yasinkhan and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-14-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1972a; (1981)22GLR175; 1981(3)SCALE1400; (1981)4SCC250; [1982]1SCR695
..... that physical violence should be used continuous ill treatment cessation of marital intercourse studied neglect indifference on the part of the husband and an assertion on the part of the husband ..... similar act the general principles governing acts constituting cruelty legal or mental ill treatment or indifference cannot vary from case to case though the facts may be different 31 similarly while .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial