Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian wireless telegraphy act 1933 17 of 1933 section 4 power of central government to exempt persons from provisions of the act Page 1 of about 18 results (0.209 seconds)

Parvinder Singh and ors. Vs. Executive Officer, Municipal Committee an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1992)102PLR498

..... that the petitioner-firm was required to obtain a licence before exhibiting its programmes through cable tv as provided by section 4 of the indian telegraph act, 1885 (hereinafter called the act of 1885), the indian wireless telegraphy act. 1933 (hereinafter called the 'telegraphy act') and the relevant rules published thereunder3. the pleadings of the parties being somewhat sketchy, i had initially toyed with the idea of adjourning the ..... special antenna of any type and associated front and converter, direct from satellites operating in broadcasting satellite service or fixed satellite service, shall be deemed to be wireless telegraphy apparatus for the purposes of the indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933 (17 of 1933) and no person shall establish, maintain or work or possess, or deal in. such sets without a licence from the central government under .....

State of West Bengal Vs. Anal Chowdhury

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1985]151ITR790(Cal)

..... a television set' is defined in section 2(a) to mean a person in whose name a licence is issued in respect of any television set under the indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933, and includes a person, who is, for the time being found in possession of any television set irrespective of its size or whether it is a ..... tax. power to tax must be derived from a specific taxing entry.12. to recapitulate, entry 31 of the union list reads:'31. posts and telegraphs, telephones; wireless, broadcasting and other like forma of communication.'13. this is a general entry. it does not confer power of taxation. even if the petitioner's submission that ..... hesitation in rejecting this submission.46. article 301 of the constitution:learned counsel for the appellant-state challenged the finding of the learned single judge that the impugned act violated the provision of article 301 of the constitution. article 301 states : 'subject to the other provisions of this part, trade, commerce and intercourse throughout the .....

Ramakrishna Dish Antenna System Vs. the Deputy Superintendent of Polic ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1989AP295

..... use the above apparatus for the above said dual purposes without obtaining any licence under the rules made under the indian telegraph act, 1885 and the indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933 or whether there are exempt under any exemptions granted under the above said rules.6. it becomes necessary ..... 2 states that radio, television and v.c.r. sets shall not be wireless telegraphy apparatus for the purposes of indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933. rule 3 provides that the licensing requirements under the 'licensing of wireless receiving apparatus rules, 1965', indian wireless telegraphy (possession) rules, 1965, and commercial broadcast receiver licensing (dealers) rules, ..... and converter, direct from satellites operating in 'broadcasting satellite service' or 'fixed satellite service', shall be deemed to be wireless telegraphy apparatus for the purposes of the indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933 (17 1933), and no person shall establish, maintain or work, or possess, or deal in, such sets .....

State of Kerala Vs. E. Bhaskaran Kunhikelu

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1971Ker188; 1971CriLJ955

..... the counts. for the offence under the telegraph act he sentenced the respondent to pay a fine of rs. 100/- and in default ..... allegation in the complaint filed by p. w. 1, the wireless licensing inspector, tellicherry, before the sub-magistrate. tellicherry-i was that the respondent had committed offences punishable under section 4 read with section 20 of the indian telegraph act, xiii of 1885 and section 3 read with section 6 of the indian wireless telegraphy act, xvii of 1933. the sub magistrate convicted the respondent on both .....

Union of India Vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the backdrop facts of the cases, question also arises whether spectrum licence subjected to proceedings under the code, and it overrides the provisions contained in the indian telegraph act, 1885, indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933, and telecom regulatory authority of india act, 1997.21. in view of the fact that the licence contained an agreement between the licensor, licensee, and the lenders, whether on the basis of ..... inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force, the code shall prevail. as such, the code overrides the provisions of the indian telegraph act, 1885, indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933, and telecom regulatory authority of india act, 1997.15. in the case of rcom, the resolution plan is pending consideration of the adjudicating authority under section 31 of the code. 21 16 .....

Jethanand Betab Vs. the State of Delhi (Now Delhi Administration)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC89; 26(1960)CLT533(SC); 1960CriLJ160; [1960]1SCR755

..... punjab (circuit bench), delhi confirming the conviction of theappellant and the sentence passed on him by the magistrate, first class, delhi,under s. 6(1-a) of the indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933 (xvii of 1933)(hereinafter called 'the act'). 2. jethanand, the appellant herein, was prosecuted, along with another, inthe court of the magistrate, first class, delhi, under s. 6(1-a) of the ..... to the extent mentioned in the fourthcolumn thereof. the first schedule---------------------------------------------------------year no. short title extent of repeal(1) (2) (3) (4)---------------------------------------------------------1949 xxxi the indian wireless telegraphy the whole (amendment) act, 1949.--------------------------------------------------------- s. 4 : the repeal by this act ofany enactment shall not affect any other enactment in which the repealedenactment has been applied, incorporated or referred to; * * * 6. the substance of the aforesaid .....

Bharati Telemedia Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Rep. By Secretary and Other ...

Court : Kerala

..... granted license to provide direct-to- home (dth) broadcasting service by the government of india under section 4 of the telegraph act, 1885 (central act 13 of 1885) and indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933 (central act 17 of 1933) and providing such service within the state. (fd) luxury provided by direct-to-home (dth) broadcasting service ..... are all companies engaged in providing dth services, having been granted licenses, by the government of india, to provide such services under the indian telegraph act, 1885 and the indian wireless act, 1933 on the terms and conditions specified in the licenses issued to them. 2. in the broadcasting sector, the content of the ..... operators against the aforementioned judgment was pending before the supreme court, the state legislature retrospectively amended the proviso to section 4 (1) of the act to exclude cable operators whose total number of connections, including those given through franchisees, was seven thousand and five hundred or less, from the .....

Sharad Keshao Ghonge, Proprietor, DiglIn Industries Vs. State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(1)BomCR428; (2005)107BOMLR1088; 2006(2)MhLj356

..... that dealer possession licence must be for minimum of 100 sets. the dealer possession licence is issued under the provisions of the indian wireless telegraphy act 1933 and the rules framed therein namely the indian wireless telegraphy (possession) rules 1965, which hereinafter shall be known as wireless telegraphy rules 1965. the tender document clearly required the dealer possession licence. the petitioner has contended that the licence obtained by him ..... , 2004 is for 150 sets. no other rule has been shown to us which have been framed under the indian telegraph act 1885, which requires a licence for repairs of either a wireless telegraphy apparatus or wireless transmitter as set out in section 2 of the indian wireless telegraphy act 1933. in our opinion, therefore, the contention advanced on behalf of the petitioner that the licence issued to him .....

Star India Private Limited Vs. Department of Industrial Policy and Pr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... such manner, on such conditions and subject to such payments as may be prescribed. 27. it is clear that only a person who is licensed under section 5 of the indian wireless telegraphy act can use a teleport from india from which a tv channel is to be uplinked to a satellite. equally, to be uplinked to a satellite and thereafter downlinked from such ..... authority. 66. since the telegraph authority, acting under the telegraph act and the indian wireless telegraphy act, is required to act in public interest, the jurisdiction of the said authority is left untrammeled by the provisions of the trai act. it can thus be seen that trai and the telegraph authority both act in public interest. the trai act, the telegraph act and the indian wireless telegraphy act, being statutes in pari materia, form a .....

Asso.of Unified Tele.Serv.Prov.and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the licensee, which read as under: 32. obligations imposed on the licensee. 32.1 the provisions of the indian telegraph act 1885, the indian wireless telegraphy act 1933, and the telecom regulatory authority of india act, 1997 as modified from time to time or any other statute on their replacement shall govern this licence. 32. ..... from time to time and instructions as are issued by the licensor/trai. 16.3 the statutory provisions and the rules made under indian telegraph act 1885 or indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933 shall govern this licence agreement. any order passed under these statutes shall be binding on the licensee. 23. part 2 ..... payment, as it thinks fit, to any person to establish, maintain or work a telegraph in any part of india. the indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933, regulates the possession of wireless telegraph apparatus. the national policy of 1994 was the first major step towards deregularisation, liberalization and private sector participation for providing certain .....