Indian Tolls Act 1888 Section 1 - Judgment Search Results

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corpo ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1993Bom54; (1992)94BOMLR194

follows a bharat petroleum corporation ltd hindustan petroleum corporation ltd indian oil corporation ltd ibp company ltd along with two of 4th may 1950 one of the enactments was the corporation act 1888 as a result of the said notification dated 4th operation of section 394 of the bombay municipal corporation act 1888 stands limited restricted by section 31 of the petroleum act said notification licence was not required to be obtained under section 394 of the corporation act in respect of the quantityexceeding with part ii schedule m to the said act of 1888 b the said oil companies manufacture and or sell petroleum

Thakur Raghubir Singh Vs. Court of Wards, Ajmer and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC373; [1953]4SCR1049

committed an offence of extortion within the meaning of the indian penal code act xlv of 1860 7 just as section of extortion within the meaning of the indian penal code act xlv of 1860 7 just as section 110 declares an of either act xlii of 1950 or regulation i of 1888 which provided a machinery for determining the question whether a have recourse for establishing the contrary in a civil court section 112 of act xlii of 1950 cannot therefore be held the combined operation of section 112 of act xlii of 1950 and of the provisions of regulation i of 1888 is

The Secretary to the Board of Revenue Income-tax Vs. Al. Ar. Rm. Aruna ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1921)ILR44Mad65

here is the exact opposite of that employed in the indian act the debts owed to the company may be good or arose in british india within the meaning of the act in paragraph 1 of the letter the interest in question the judgement of fry l j in colquhoun v books 1888 21 q b d 52 these words were interpreted as purview of the act and become taxable under the taxing sections sections 3t and 33 are examples of the former class those receipts 8 in gresham life assurance society v styles 1890 25 q b d 351 lord esher described this balance

The Secretary to the Board of Revenue Income-tax Vs. Al.Ar.Rm. Arunach ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1921Mad427; (1920)39MLJ649

at the taxable income and as will be seen the indian legislature in the corresponding section 9 of the present act to examine the differences between the english and the indian act on this point apart too from section 50 there is be charged though in the customs and inland revenue act 1888 the tax payable under schedule d is called income tax professional profits which correspond to clause 4 and 5 of section 5 of the indian act namely income derived from business the meaning of the word profits in pages 98 to 101 he says that the word has a fundamental meaning but

Choctaw, O. and G. R. Co. Vs. Mackey

Court : US Supreme Court

northern pacific railway co v townsend 190 u s 267 indian territory illuminating oil co v oklahoma 240 u s 522 502 act april 24 1896 c 122 29 stat 98 act march 28 1900 c 111 31 stat 52 footnote 2 in enforcing it affirmed footnote 1 act cong feb 18 1888 c 13 25 stat 35 section 2 provides that said act cong feb 18 1888 c 13 25 stat 35 section 2 provides that said corporation is authorized to take and 864 the rock island acquired its interest on march 24 1904 under a lease from the choctaw oklahoma gulf for a

Shri Ramdas Bhikaji Darade, President, Yeola Municipal Council Vs. the ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR695; 2009(4)MhLj436

reason to grant any stay the prayer is accordingly rejected indian evidence act 1872 section 24 v s sirpurkar deepak verma conduct have been elaborated and discussed the submission that the act inaction on the part of the petitioner president falls within section 16 1 1d of the mumbai municipal corporation act 1888 for short mmc act though the phrase has constructed has matter can be considered by the government in terms of section 55a of the maharashtra municipal councils nagar panchayats and industrial 3 the relevant extract of the order is as under 1 grievance of the petitioner was two fold in the petition

Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC2277; 2005CriLJ2533; JT2005(4)SC123; (2005)5SCC294

of commission of an offence under section 279 of the indian penal code may debar the court from releasing the accused by him it is a settled position of law that act or action of one of the accused cannot be used maharashtra on which date the court passed the order under section 268 of the code of criminal procedure 65 as regards a discussion had already been held said mushrif 64 on 18 9 2002 mr mulani visited bangalore in the company of

Abdur Rahim Undre Vs. Padma Adbur Rahim Undre

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1982Bom341; 2(1982)DMC204

which is limited in its application to he marriages between indian citizens after analysing different types of marriages which could be further clear from the provisions of s 17 of the act which deal with registration of foreign marriages solemnised under other it can only takeout some thing which is included in section 18 1 14 for property appreciating the controversy raised before 9 mrs parhat qazi pw 10 hussein beg and pw 11 zafar ali mirjee the plaintiff is also relying upon the

P. Thimmanaiak and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(4)KarLJ173; 2009(3)KCCRSN102; 2009(5)AIRKarR121; AIR2009NOC2658

into consideration the subsequent amendment to section 209 of the act the learned single judge has reserved liberty to the grama as the same is contrary to the proviso given to section 209 of the act the single judge held that they 12 p a on the said sum without any delay 14 in those circumstances we do not see any reason to

Karimbil Kunhikoman Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC723; [1962]Supp1SCR829

ninth annual general special and twelfth ordinary meetings of the indian central arecanut committee held on january 23 1958 that the the article was further amended by the constitution fourth amendment act 1955 which was also made retrospective and therefore art 31a in view of art 31 2 the fact that under sections 70 and 72 when the government in its turn assigns the madras legislature passed the madras estates land act no 1 of 1908 which was later amended from time to time