Indian Succession Act 1925 Chapter 1 Of Grant Of Probate And Letters Of Administration - Judgment Search Results

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

..... time whereas the indian succession act 1925 is a particular act enacted by the central legislature later in point of time in so far as grant and revocation of probates and letters of administration is concerned the indian succession act 1925 apart from being .....

Solomon and ors. Vs. Muthiah and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1974)1MLJ53

provisions contained in chapter ii of part v of the indian succession act lay down the rules in case of intestates in matters of inheritance contrary to the provisions of the succession act for the reasons i have already indicated i am force with reference to part v of the indian succession act 1925 within the meaning of section 6 of the central flow from section 29 2 of the indian succession act 1925 on the other hand the language of section 29 2 defendant being another brother of swaminathan the provisions contained in chapter ii of part v of the indian succession act lay the act cases in which intestacy occurred before 1st january 1866 and intestate succession to the property of a hindu mohammadan decree of the learned subordinate judge the learned district judge granted a decree to the plaintiffs declaring their one half right iii of 1874 last paragraph of section 2 6 the probate and administration act v of 1881 act vi of 1889 vii of 1899 except section 13 9 the native christian administration of estates act vii of 1901 and10 the devolution act

Anthappa (Deceased) by His Testamentary L.Rs Vs. Distinappa Alias Subb ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2006Kant60; ILR2006KAR1576; 2006(1)KarLJ270

christians in the state of coorg from the operation of indian succession act 1865 and cannot be extended to the mysore custom to be practiced and prevailed in the matter of succession which is even recognised under the 1925 act by enacting the issue as to the application of the indian succession act 1865 the trial court appears to have formed an opinion the 1865 act is reproduced in section 3 of the 1925 act section 3 3 provides for persons exempted under this by application of the doctrine of eclipse enshrined in article 13 1 and 13 3 of the constitution as per article and 13 3 recognition of custom to be practiced exemption granted under on facts held having regard to the customs which and also as noted in the mysore gazette that several administrative changes took place in the year 1882 and the four

Mary Roy and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC1011; 1986(0)KLT508(SC); 1986(1)SCALE250; (1986)2SCC209; [1986]1SCR371; 1986(1)LC515(SC)

of travancore or is such intestate succession governed by the indian succession act 1925 and if it continues to be governed in the territories of that state in regard to intestate succession to the property of members of the indian christian community 1925 and the continued operation of the travancore christian succession act 1092 was saved by section 29 sub section 2 of was not a law corresponding to the indian succession act 1925 since the latter act had a much wider coverage in act 1092 shall not stand repealed despite the extension of chapter ii of part v of the indian succession act 1925 and one of these statutes was the indian succession act 1925 the expression the states wherever occurring in the indian succession does not in any manner cast any obligation on chandigarh administration with reference to the auction of leasehold rights relating to

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

..... time whereas the indian succession act 1925 is a particular act enacted by the central legislature later in point of time in so far as grant and revocation of probates and letters of administration is concerned the indian succession act 1925 apart from being .....

The General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. Vs. Jan ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1941)43BOMLR346

on behalf of the defendants that article 68 of the indian limitation act governs the case and that the breach of or some part of it section 292 of the indian succession act 1925 does not merely give a new starting point sub section 10 and 11 of the administrator general s act and a combined order was made in respect of the administration of jaffer s estate 18 the trustee act of 1925 15 geo v c 19 of course does not apply on november 17 1928 for administration of jaffer s estate 18 the trustee act of 1925 15 geo v c 19 administration de bonk nan and the person to whom such grant is made will be entitled to take possession of the like those used in section 83 of the court of probate act 1857 are far from assisting the contention that a entitled to such residue 73 on june 9 1925 the letters of administration were duly issued to havabai on behalf of to have stood aside and not taken out letters of administration it seems to me impossible to contend seriously that she

D. Chelliah Nadar and anr. Vs. G. Lalita Bai and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1978Mad66

6 of the part b state laws act if the indian succession act had a universal application or applied to indian in force in travancore state though strictly under the indian succession act they would not have contemplated any law in the virtue of section 6 of the part b states laws act 1951 the supreme court took this view as a perusal from the appointed date the indian succession act xxxix of 1925 had come into force in part b states what is all cases of intestacy the christian succession regulation ii of 1092 relates to intestate succession among the indian christians in travancore not been asked for the order of injunction cannot be granted against the defendants regarding these items in other respects the the importance of the question gave leave to prefer a letters patent appeal thus the matter has come up before a

Vera D. Thackersey Vs. Bai Manekbai Annasaheb Thackersey

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1977Bom419; (1976)78BOMLR543

..... rule i it is provided that under section 265 of the indian succession act 1925 the high court has appointed all civil judges to act for the district judges as delegates to grant probate and letters of administration in ..... when it was brought to his notice that section 388 which is under the chapter succession certificates would have no application in the facts and circumstances of the matter before .....

Ranchhoddas Govinddas Banatwala

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR219; 1976MhLJ636

47 the word debt has not been defined in the indian succession act it has been given various meanings with reference first of the three qualifications on the grant of a succession certificate mentioned earlier has been satisfied in the present ease emphasis on the observation quoted above namely the succession certificate act is partially at any rate a fiscal enactment and it section 2 of section 370 of the indian succession act 1925 accordingly this petition was placed before me for hearing as or a liquidated sum of money the indian succession act 1925 is not a fiscal statute it does not provide for of administration or probate thus the three restrictions on the grant of succession certificates by a court are 1 that the does not provide for the levy of probate duty on probates letters of administration and succession certificates the only section of the said shares to the said petition he has annexed letters of consent given by his two brothers giving their consent for the levy of probate duty on probates letters of administration and succession certificates the only section of the act which

Shri Vitthal Ramchandra Mali Vs. Smt. Laxmi Ganpati Mali and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2006Bom298; 2006(4)ALLMR389; 2006(4)BomCR31

..... grant of sections 372 384 388 of the indian succession act 1925 section 28a of the bombay civil courts act 1869 section 26 1 of the succession certificate act 1889 chapter xiv para nos 304 and 305 of the civil manual probate and administration act .....