Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Sorted by: old Court: orissa Year: 1948 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.038 seconds)

Sep 09 1948 (PC)

Saradhakar Naik and ors. Vs. the King

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-09-1948

Reported in : AIR1950Ori67

..... and most significant wag the report of the privy council in 1902 in the matabeleland case. 'the situation is on a very familiar to indian lawyers and administrators. for in india company during its rule, and afterwards the crown, has acquired large poweis of administration...and yet, unless there has been cession of territory, the ..... 20 p. c. ). the lord chancellor on behalf of the privy counoil (sic) out that the sovereignty derived from the nizam on a particular line of railway did not justify the arrest com plained of. the authority, therefore, to execute any criminal process must be derived in some way or another from the sovereign of ..... extra territorial authority. the powers delegated are both executive and legislative, and are sufficiently extensive to cover all the extra territorial powers previously exercised in accordance with indian acts.'56. as instance, of exercise of full jurisdiction acquired by cession, the following passage at pp. 423-424 may be noted :'there are certain areas .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 1948 (PC)

Tirtha Naik and ors. Vs. Lal Sadananda Singh

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-30-1948

Reported in : AIR1952Ori99

..... instead of hazarana. these provisions were later placed on the statute book by an amendment of section 60a, by section 3 of the central provinces land revenue act of 1898 (act xii of 1898). the question, therefore, is, having regard to these provisions, whether the conferment of protected status effected any change in the tenure of the ..... the younger sons had received equal shares with the eldest, according to private distribution, and the rule of primogeniture which was later introduced into the central provinces land revenue act, was then unknown among the 'kulta' families. the claims of the co-sharers in the gountia's 'bhogra' were, therefore, definitely recognised as early as 1864 ..... favours the appellant inasmuch as sub-section (4) of section 65 of the old act which governs this case, also leaves unaffected any arrangement made prior to the passing of the act of 1898. in the second case reported in 37 indian cases 107 the only point decided was that the grant of a protected status did .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //