Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 77,580 results (0.231 seconds)

Shahdara (Delhi) Saharanpur Light Railway Co. Ltd. Vs. the Municipal B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1747; [1967]3SCR243

..... . the next enactment to be referred to is the indian railway companies act, 1895 (act x of 1895), which provided for the payment, by railway companies, registered under the indian companies act, 1882, of interest out of capital during construction. section 2(1) defines 'railway' as meaning a railway as defined in s. 3, clause (4) of the railways act. section 3 provided for a railway company paying interest on its paid-up share capital, out ..... in that section. there are other consequential provisions, in this act. 15. the indian tramways act, 1902 (act iv of 1902) was one to apply the provisions of the indian railway companies act, 1895, to certain tramway companies. the preamble to this act iv of 1902, stated that it was expedient to apply the provisions of the indian railway companies act, 1895, to companies formed for the construction of tramways 'not differing in structure and .....

Kally Dass Mookerjee Vs. the East Indian Railway Company

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1899)ILR26Cal465

..... are concerned. a railway company is not liable for the acts of even its own servants, if those acts are not done in the course and scope of the servants' duty--cobb v. great western railway co. (1894) l.r., app. cas. 419.64. c.a.v.maclean, c.j.,65. this is an appeal by the east indian railway company from a decision of ..... with their duty when they allowed gunpowder to be carried in a compartment where they allowed smoking54. section 47 of the indian railways act, 1890, empowers the company to make rules, and that power is given for the very purpose of meeting cases of this kind; but the defendants have not shown that they took ..... on their part that something dangerous was being carried.40. it was not possible for the company's servants to examine the luggage of every passenger. section 58 of the indian railways act, 1890, provides that every passenger shall, on request, deliver to the railway servants an account in writing containing such a description of the goods he is carrying as may .....

Northern Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of the railroad and railway companies, or of their respective vendees, other than as the lands fall within or without the reservation. if they were within the boundaries of the reservation, they were lands of the indians; otherwise, public lands of the united states, and passed to the companies, respectively, under the act of congress and the ..... railway company, for certain described lands. the foundation of the bill is that the patents were issued by mistake as public lands granted to the railroad company under the act of congress dated july 2, 1864 (13 stat. 365, c. 217), the lands actually being, it is alleged by the government, part of the yakima indian reservation ..... states v. winans, supra. it is contended that the northern pacific railway company and the individual appellants are bona fide purchasers, and, as such, entitled to protection under the act of march 2, 1896 (29 stat. 42, c. 39). section 1 of that act provides that suits brought by the united states to vacate and annul any .....

Fazal D. Allana Vs. Mangaldas M. Pakvasa

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1921)23BOMLR1144; 66Ind.Cas.726

..... the seller and the share certificates property in the shares does not pass to the purchaser.35. section 28 of the indian companies act enacts that shares shall be transferable in manner provided by the articles of the company. article 33 of the articles of association of the central india mills provides that shares will be transferred by an ..... out of land and things attached to the earth or permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth. it is enacted by section 28 of the indian companies act that shares in a company shall be moveable property. share certificates are moveable property and are therefore goods within the meaning of section 108 of (he ..... estopped by the said act of his from asserting any right to the shares. mr,, inverarity for the plaintiff contended that there is no estoppel and has relied on france v. clarka (1884) 26 ch. d. 257. tayler v. great indian peninsula railway co. (1895) 4 g. &. j 559. hutchison v. the colorado united mining company and hamill (1886) .....

G.i.P. Railway Company Vs. A.B. Tamboli

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1926)28BOMLR718

..... make his signature one on behalf of the plaintiff, within the meaning of section 72 of the indian railways act. jamshedji's signature was made by him as an agent who had authority to make such a signature. in aldridge v. the great western railway company (1864) 33 l.j.c.p. 161 where a carrier was employed both by the plaintiff ..... for a particular sale, so as to make the goods ' ascertained ' under section 83 of the indian contract act. here there was a definite appropriation of these bales by the plaintiff to the contract, exhibit 68, and that had been assented to by the railway company. according to the ruling of this court in ram-chandra natha v. g.i.p ..... of law, under section 72 of the indian railways act, does not really arise for decision, but, as the case may go further, i think we should give our opinion. it has been laid down by this court, following brabant & go. v. king [1895] a.c. 632, 640, that the obligation of the railway company towards the consignor of goods includes not .....

Maricopa and Phoenix R. Co. Vs. Arizona

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , 1895 156 u.s. 347 appeal from the supreme court of the territory of arizona syllabus when congress grants to a railway company organized under the laws of a territory a right of way over an indian reservation within the territory, and the road is constructed entirely within the territory, that part of it within the reservation is ..... irrespective of the amount involved. after the organization of the territory of arizona, certain land situated within its geographical limits was set apart as an indian reservation, for the use of the pima and maricopa indians. act of february 28, 1859, c. 66, 3, 11 stat. 401. the tract is known as the "gila river reservation." the maricopa ..... of power. its necessary effect was, to the extent of the grant and for the purposes thereof, to withdraw the land from the operation of the prior act of reservation. and the immediate consequence of such withdrawal, so far as it affected the property and rights withdrawn, was to reestablish the full sway and dominion of .....

Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Ry. Co. Vs. Shane

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , colorado & santa fe ry. co. v. shane, 157 u.s. 348 (1895) gulf, colorado and santa fe railway company v. shane no. 212 submitted january 29, 1895 decided april 1, 1895 157 u.s. 348 error to the united states court for the indian territory syllabus it being settled that, by the joint resolution of march 3, 1891, 26 stat. 1115, the ..... brought the case here by error. the writ of error was allowed and sealed on june 5, 1891. it is contended that we are without jurisdiction because, by the act creating the circuit courts of appeals, the court of appeals for the eighth circuit has alone jurisdiction of this controversy. it is settled "that, by the joint resolution of ..... sued out, or taken before july 1, 1891, the court has jurisdiction of this case, the writ of error having been allowed and sealed june 5, 1891. under the act of may 2, 1890, c. 182, providing a temporary government for the territory of oklahoma, the provisions of the statutes of arkansas that if either party shall desire a panel .....

S. Sundaram Ayyar Vs. the Municipal Council of Madura and the Secretar ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1902)ILR25Mad635

..... council may be entitled will not be the same as in the case of the street mayor of birkenhead v. l. and n.w. railway company 15 q.b.d. 572.17. turning now to indian cases, in the chairman of the naihati municipality v. kishori lal goswami i.l.r. 13 calc. 171 it was held that the vesting ..... owner of the land forming the street in question. it becomes therefore unnecessary to consider whether, having regard to the restriction imposed on the indian legislature by the proviso to section 22 of the indian councils act, 1861 (24 and 25 vic., ch. 67), and to the authorities empowered in their executive capacity to dispose of all real and ..... the extent of property and the nature of the right, title and interest possessed by urban authorities in streets vested in them under the metropolis local management. act, 1855, the public health act, 1875, and similar enactments, were considered and settled. the leading case in which the question first presented itself for consideration in the court of appeal is .....

Emperor Vs. Ganga Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1907)ILR29All685

..... by their lordships of the privy council in norendra nath sircar v. kamalbasini dasi (1895) l.r., 23 i.a., 18 and also in robinson v. canadian pacific railway company l.r., 1892, a.c., 481, where they add that resort must be had to the pre-existing law in all instances where a code contains provisions of doubtful ..... in such cases.'49. mr. justice fulton, while admitting that is was undoubtedly a serious measure to limit the meaning of words in such a carefully drawn act as the indian penal code, and one which no court would attempt unless it were practically certain that the matter to be eliminated was not within the contemplation of the legislature, ..... i find that their lordships themselves say the question did not arise for consideration and i can find no reference in the judgment to the penal code. moreover, the indian evidence act had not, when this judgment was passed, been, consolidated. i am therefore forced to consider the question virtually as res integra and in the light of the laws .....

MuThe Venkatachellepati and ors. Vs. Row Sahib Pyinda Venkatachellapat ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1912)23MLJ652

..... to the plaintiff: except on terms indicated by obvious considerations of justice and this view also finds support from mellor j. dictum in clough v. london and northwestern railway company (1871) l.r. 7 ex. 26. in this country there has never been any distinction between equitable and legal jurisdictions and the same court has the power ..... the principle upon which think we ought to act in this case is similar to taht embodied in several statutes of the indian legislature, for instance section 41 of the specific relief act, section 55, subsection 6, clause (b) of the transfer of property act and section 86 of the trusts act. i do not propose to consider whether we ..... taken to the reception of its contents by secondary evidence. mr. ramachandra aiyar, the learned vakil for the appellant, however contends relying upon section 49 of the registration act that the document itself could not be used in evidence at all. section 49 says : ' no document required by section 17 to be registered shall.6. (a .....