Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Court: allahabad Page 82 of about 2,864 results (0.035 seconds)

Aug 21 2002 (HC)

Gyan Prakash Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2957; (2002)3UPLBEC2652

..... that the respondent no. 2, u. p. anusuchit jati vitta evam vikas nigam is a government company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 4. the petitioner holds a diploma in engineering from indian institute of handloom technology. in the year 1988, respondent no. 2 invited applications for making appointment ..... on the post of instructors in typing, handloom and carpentry trades in the training centres established by it. in pursuance thereto, the petitioner applied for the said post, was selected and appointed in the company ..... opening of nine more training centres. from the averments made in the short counter-affidavit, it appears that the board of directors of the company also had passed a resolution dated 30.12.1995, recommending the pay scale of rs. 1,400-2,300 for instructors in all the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2006 (HC)

Hari Shankar JaIn Vs. Bar Council of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3893

..... them. with this ends in view, all india bar committee was set up in the year 1953. it was considered that the provision of indian high courts act, 1861, could not have the pace with the time. government of india felt the necessity for going to a legislation. in this back ground, advocates ..... our society. a legal practitioner is conventionally bound to conduct himself in a manner befitting to this high and honourable profession. misconduct although has not been defined under advocates act, but infamous conduct in profession field constitute misconduct.20. hon'ble apex court in e.s. reddi v. chief secretary, government of andhra pradesh : [1987]3scr146 ..... or their personal grudge and enmity. courts of justice should not be allowed to be polluted by unscrupulous litigants by resorting to the extraordinary jurisdiction. a person acting bona fide and having sufficient interest in the proceeding of public interest litigation will alone have a locus standi and can approach the court to wipe out .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2007 (HC)

Akross Synthetics Private Limited Through Its Managing Director Sri Ar ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2008)13VST504(All)

..... the managinu director. the company was incorporated in the year 1994. it appears that with the intent to establish a new unit for the manufacturing ..... under section 11 of u.p. trade 'lax act (hereinafter referred to as act') is directed against the order of full bench of the tribunal dated 24.03.20032. brief facts of the case giving rise to the present revision arc that the applicant is a company incorporated under the indian companies act, 1956, of which sri arvind kumar bhasin was ..... that the unit should also fulfill the following conditions on january 17,2000:(a) the unit is registered under the said act;(b) the unit has applied for a termloan from any financil corporation or company owned or controlled by the centre or state government or any bank; (c) the unit has been allotted land for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 2006 (HC)

Sayed Mohammad Mahfooj Son of Shri Sayed Masood Ahmad Vs. State of U.P ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC1050

..... a university of local authority constituted for the purpose of local self government and includes a government componay within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, 1956 in which the state government has prepondering interest;(c) 'retrenched employee' means a person who was appointed on a post under the government or a public corporation on or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2004 (HC)

Escorts Limited Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2008)11VST326(All)

..... directed against the order of the tribunal dated july 15, 1996 relating to the assessment year, 1980-81.2. applicant is a public limited company incorporated under the indian companies act, 1956 engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of tractors. the factory of the applicant was situated at faridabad in the state of haryana and from there ..... in respect of 10 cases, it was found that they did not relate to the applicant or was found that some of the entries related to m/s. eicher tractor company and some of the entries related to the various other parties relating to the food-grain, parchoon, rice, etc., and as such 10 informations had not been taken ..... of section 28b on the ground that it is a machinery provision to check the evasion of tax. it has been further held that presumption under section 28b of the act is rebuttable. following observations the quotation appears to be from madhya bharat transport carrier v. commissioner of trade tax [2006] 143 stc 493 (pp 498-500) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 1949 (PC)

In Re: Raghubir Saran

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1949CriLJ852

..... practising at boorkee for a year, shifted to meerut. he was selected for the provincial judicial service and appointed munsif in the agra province in 1923. in 1926 the indian bar council act (act xxxvill [38] of 1926) which raised the status of vakils to that of advocates came into existence. he took advantage, as he was indeed entitled to, of the ..... character of the practitioner concerned of the order of removal cr suspension, to vary, modify cr rejoind the order. i may refer in this connection to certain cases of the indian high courts.6. in in re u, ex-lower grade pleader, kama, a. i. e. (27) 1940 rang. 82:ul cr. t. j. 272) a pleader, who was a ..... and hamilton j. on 23rd january 1942. thereafter, the applicant was sent to jail at meerut bat was released under the provisions of the u. p, prisoners' release on probation act (act vhi [8] of 1988) on 22nd october 1942. he was directed to spend period of probation under the supervision of a pleader, mr. rameshwar dayal. the period of his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 1969 (HC)

Kripa Ram Gupta Vs. R.K. Talwar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1970All296

..... respondents have also referred to air 1957 sc 397. an order made by the board of revenue transferring a case under section 5 (7-a) of the indian income-tax act, 1922 was challenged before the supreme court. that was a case where no substantial right of the subject was involved and there was no denial of equal ..... accorded to persons or things similarly situated. this would happen when the legislature vests a discretion in an authority, be it the government or an administrative official acting either as an executive officer or even in a quasi-judicial capacity, by a legislation which does not lay down any policy or disclose any tangible or ..... . frontier rly., air 1964 sc 600 the question was whether rule 148 (3) of volume i of the indian establishment code contravened article 14 of the constitution. the rule provided for the termination of service of certain railway servants, and did not mention any grounds upon which the termination could be effected. gajendragadkar, j,, who expressed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1942 (PC)

Kunwar Bishwanth Singh Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, C. P. and U. P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1942]10ITR322(All)

..... shall not be exempt from any federal taxation in respect of any lands, buildings or income being his personal property or personal income.under section 60 of the indian-tax act the general government may, by notification in the gazette of india, make an exemption, reduction in rate or other modification, in respect of income-tax in favour ..... sovereign ruler when the authorities cited on behalf of the assessee and the argument of the learned advocate-general that under section 3 and section 4 of the indian income-tax act income and not the person is taxed might have to be seriously considered, but we have to deal with the income which the maharaja of benares receives ..... agent to captain his higness the maharaja sir aditya narain singh bahadur, k. c. s. i, d. litt., within the meaning of section 43 of the indian income-tax act. in spite of proper service of the afosaid notice kunwar bishwanath singh failed to appear, nor was any communication receive from him by post. the income-tax officer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 1945 (PC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shrimati Shingari Bai

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1945All102

..... the same thing as 'income.' this, again, turned on the construction of the relevant statute of st. lucia and is no authority for the proposition that in construing the indian income-tax act, with the special provisions as to profits and gains of a business, and as to the manner of computation of those profits and gains according to the method of ..... are clearly of opinion that the section relates to a method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee for his own purposes - in this case for the purposes of the company's business -and does not relate to a method of making up a statutory return of assessment to income-tax...it may well be that, though the profit brought out ..... . it is, i think, important, in view of what their lordships have said in that ease, to bear in mind what the question before them actually was. an assessee company had been asked for an income-tax return. it made a return to the income-tax officer consisting of (a) a copy of its balance-sheet and profit and loss .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 1955 (HC)

L. Dwarka Dass Vs. Income-tax Officer, Special Circle a Ward, Kanpur.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1956]29ITR60(All)

..... a part of pakistan, the union government cannot be made liable for the refund of the amounts, because the sums were paid before the partition, and the indian income-tax act would not govern such a case. concerning the second ground, he says that a liability like this does not come within the words used in article 9 ..... excess payment. i do not think that this article takes away the liability to make a refund, as provided in section 48 of the income-tax act or article 9 of the indian independence (rights, property and liabilities) order of 1947.reliance was next placed by the learned counsel for the respondent on the report of an agreement ..... on june 7, 1948, and february 27, 1950. a further defence has been taken to the effect that under section 9 of the indian independence act, the governor-general issued certain orders, including orders known as the indian independence (partition council) order, 1947, and the arbitral tribunal order, 1947. reference is also made to the report of the expert .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //