Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Court: allahabad Page 81 of about 2,864 results (0.084 seconds)

Jan 05 1968 (HC)

Dr. A.N. Mukerji Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1969All489; 1969CriLJ1203

..... bhawanipore, at the grand hotel calcutta, 3 and 6 belvedre park police station alipore 2-b outram street. calcutta, police station hastings, karnani mansion, police station beniapukur, railway quarters alipore, 12 godfrey mansion, police station garden reach and other places in calcutta, you committed rape on smt. harbans kaur, with her consent, knowing that yon ..... whether a person of such depraved morals should be allowed to continue in the noble profession of medicine is a matter, however, for the consideration of indian medical council and not by the court. the direction of the sessions judge that the appellant be debarred from practice as a medical practitioner for a period ..... on behalf of the accused at that stage of the proceedings. his statement, therefore, should not have been admitted in evidence under section 33 of the evidence act. it has, therefore, to be ignored. the learned trial judge has, however, held on the basis of the evidence furnished by the prosecutrix herself that some .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2009 (HC)

Smt. Mamta Dubey Vs. Rajesh Dubey

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2009All141

..... elastomers. he had opened the bank account with forged signatures of mrs neelu kohli and fabricated the resolution of the board of directors of the company. statutory authority under the companies act had refused to register documents filed by mr naveen kohli and had issued show-cause notice. all business associates were cautioned to avoid dealing with ..... by her parents and why the defendant waited till the year 1998 for filing a complaint against the plaintiff and his family members under section 498-a ipc. even today, the defendant is not willing to withdraw the criminal prosecution pending against the plaintiff and his family members. both the daughters born to the ..... ms. deepti rawal, his cousin sister and his other female colleagues and that the defendant has filed several cases including criminal complaint under section 498-a ipc against the plaintiff and his family members including his parents, sister and sister-in-law and the father of the plaintiff was arrested and was sent to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 1944 (PC)

Gappumal Kanhaiyalal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, C. P. and U. P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1945]13ITR210(All)

..... the second and fourth in the affirmative.iqbal ahmad, c.j. - i agree.by the court. - under the provisions of section 66 (5) of the indian income-tax act, 1922, our decision on the points referred to us is that the first and third questions should be answered in the negative and the second and fourth in the ..... cannot constitute the kind of charge contemplated in section 9 (1) (iv). i have already explained why i consider that this argument is fallacious. the income-tax act was to continue in operation for an indefinite period and the legislature could have no certainty that land revenue would everywhere continue throughout that period to be a charge upon ..... in lalla mal samgham lal v. commissioner of income-tax, but as that case was decided before the provision about the deduction of annual charges was introduced into the act it is not helpful.the tribunals own arguments are three. the first is based on the assumption that the legislature could not have contemplated a double deduction. 'where .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 1962 (HC)

Seth Champalal Ramswarup, Beawar Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, U.P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1964]52ITR201(All)

..... on which the tribunal could hold that the expenditure of rs. 24,400 claimed as legal expenditure was not admissible under section 10(2)(xv) of the indian income-tax act?'(3) whether there was material on which the tribunal could hold that the expenditure of rs. 24,400 claimed as legal expenditure did not pertain to the ..... from messrs. ramjasmal navrangrai as on october 22, 1930. in order to meet this debt liability messrs. ramjasmal navrangrai transferred to the assessee some assets including shares in incorporated companies for a consideration of rs. 1,72,304 leaving a debit balance of rs. 1,03,176 in favour of the assessee. from kartak 1988 (1931 a.d.) ..... ) has in pursuance of the directions given by this court dated 11th of december, 1957, allowing an application under section 66(2) of the indian income-tax act (hereinafter referred to as the act) submitted a statement of case and referred some questions of law to this court for answer. when the hearing of the case started before us .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2008 (HC)

Kapil Dhawan Vs. Chhotey Lal Gaya Prasad Trust and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC831

..... the suit, therefore, the compromise itself was not in accordance with the provision of civil procedure code. the memorandum of process issued by the registrar of the companies under the companies act, 1956 has been brought on record by petitioner. the defendant while filing counter-affidavit has placed reliance upon the orders passed by the court below on ..... canvass the legality or correctness of the action. only public law declaration would be made at the behest of the petitioner, a public spirited person.(6) calcutta gas company (proprietary) ltd. v. state of west bengal and ors. : air1962sc1044 :5. the first question that falls to be considered is whether the appellant has ..... unless the court, for reasons to be recorded, thinks fit to grant such adjournment).(explanation. - an agreement or compromise which is void or voidable under the indian contract act, 1872 (9 of 1872) shall not be deemed to be lawful within the meaning of this rule).5. so far as provisions contained under order xli, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 1945 (PC)

B. Manmohan Lal and ors. Vs. B. Raj Kumar Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1946All89

..... defined. in hansraj gupta v. dehra dun-mussoorie electric tramway co. ltd. the question arose whether an application made by the official liquidators under section 186, companies act, was the institution of a suit, and their lordships observed at page 183:the word 'suit' ordinarily means, and apart from some context must be taken to ..... the amended decree bears. a party aggrieved from the amended decree can, therefore, appeal against the decree within the period of limitation allowed by the limitation act. i, therefore, hold that the amended decree passed by the munsif in the present case was appealable to the district judge and the present application in ..... submitted their claim to the special judge the preliminary decree ceased to exist as such and became the subject of adjudication in proceedings under the encumbered estates act. it follows that on the date that the judgment-debtor opposite parties presented their application under section 8, the preliminary decree for sale was no longer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 1968 (HC)

Steel Enterprises (Private) Ltd. Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and an ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1970]26STC133(All)

..... by the sales tax officer as the case may be. provision of a corresponding nature will be found in section 23-b of the indian income-tax act, 1922 and section 141 of the income-tax act, 1961, where again the legislature has incorporated a scheme for advance collection of the tax before the final or regular assessment.8. as ..... a rolling mill situated at kanpur. the petitioner says that it purchases steel billets and steel ingots from tata iron & steel company limited and other steel manufacturing companies and after converting them into bars and flats in its mills, it sells them to different dealers. the petitioner filed the return of its turnover, for ..... the quarters ending 30th june, 30th september and 31st december, 1967, under the u.p. sales tax act and under the central sales tax act. as according to it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1938 (PC)

Sir Sundar Singh Majithia, in Re.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1938]6ITR336(All)

..... registered with me, the income-tax officer for in the province of under clause (14) of section 2 of the indian income tax act, 1922. this certificate of registration has effect from the day of april 19 up to the 31st day of march 19 ..... case by the commissioner of income tax, c.p. and u.p., under section 66(2) of the indian income-tax act. the reference was made at the instance of sardar bahadur dr. sir sundar singh majithia, c.i.e. ..... to, was intended to include any immoveable property such as would attract the provisions of section 123 of the transfer of property act.as we have already said the firm is styled the saraiya sugar factory'. having regard to the ordinary meaning of 'factory' ..... who is the head of an undivided hindu family consisting of himself and his three sons.the commissioner states that 'the assessee enjoys large income from property, has deposits in banks and shares in companies .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1933 (PC)

Lala Ganeshi Lal and ors. Vs. Anwar Khan Mahboob Co.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 143Ind.Cas.840

..... court to the civil court.7. these remarks are applicable to the case before us. in suits brought to obtain declarations under section 42 of the indian specific relief act, it is discretionary with the court to grant or refuse the relief and in every case the court will consider whether the relief should be granted having ..... same.6. i am of opinion that the court should not grant, in the excercise of its discretion, the declaration prayed for section 42 of the indian specific relief act provides that any person entitled to any legal character, or to any right as to any property may institute a suit against any person denying or interested ..... as damages. in my opinion, the claim, for damages was entirely misconceived. the defendants lodged a complaint against the plaintiffs tinder sections 482 and 486 of the indian penal code against the plaintiffs for infringing their exclusive trade mark. in connection with that complaint a sub-inspector visited the plaintiffs premises at aligarh and seized 20 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 1998 (HC)

Piyush Tripathi Vs. Chairman/Chief Managing Director, Fertilizer Corpo ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC35; [1999(81)FLR125]

m. katju, j.1. the petitioner has claimed appointment under dying-in-harness rules. it appears that the petitioner's father was an employee of the fertilizer corporation of india limited which is a distinct legal entity and is not the government. it is settled law that a company registered under the indian companies act is a distinct legal entity and it is not the government. a limited liability company is different from its shareholders.2. hence, the dying-in-harness rules will not automatically apply to the fertilizer corporation of india limited. learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able be show me any rule or government order by which the dying-in-harness rules have been made applicable to the fertilizer corporation of india limited. the writ petition is dismissed. no order as to costs.

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //