Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway board act 1905 section 4 repealed Sorted by: old Court: guwahati Page 2 of about 2,053 results (0.924 seconds)

Dec 28 1957 (HC)

Thounaojam Ningol Indrani Devi and ors. Vs. Gurumayum Ningol Mainu Dev ...

Court : Guwahati

..... goods for sale on the strength of immemorial user. in 1955, the town fund committee erected some sheds on the site for the shop-keepers-thereafter its successor the municipal board allotted seats in those sheds to the second party and there commenced the dispute which gave rise to the initiation of the present proceedings under section 145 of the cr ..... looked into to determine the correct character of the dispute. it will be thus plain that while action under section 147 was permissible the learned magistrate in purporting to act under section 145, acted without jurisdiction, and his order referring the matter to the civil court must be sot aside.it might be repeated that the language of section 147 is clear .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1958 (HC)

Birendra Nath Guha Vs. Commissioner of Taxes

Court : Guwahati

..... the assam sales tax act, 1947 ?(2) whether the delivery of wooden sleepers at the different railway stations within ..... 32, sub-section (3), of the assam sales tax act, 1947 (assam act xvii of 1947) by the member, sales tax board, assam, shillong, by which the following questions of law have been referred to us for decision:-(1) was reliance on section 23(2) of the indian sale of goods act, 1930, in order in applying section 2 (12) of ..... the state of assam for despatch to stations outside the state of assam was complete at different railway stations in the state of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 08 1959 (HC)

Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee Vs. Local Board of Barpeta and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... , air 1951 s. c. 332 under article 143 of the constitution. it was held in this case by the majority decision that there is a prohibition in the indian constitution to delegate legislative function by the legislature to any other body. chief justice kania, mahajan, j. and mukherjea took the view that while a legislature has power to ..... air 1949 f. c. 175, it was for the first time laid down that there was a prohibition against delegation of legislative powers by the legislature in the indian constitution. the next case where the matter was authoritatively dealt with by the supreme court is what is known as the delhi laws case, article 143, constitution of india ..... constitution. 3. coming to the first point urged by the counsel, it is necessary to refer to some of the provisions of the act. section 62 of the act provides as follows :-- '62. (1) the local board may, at a meeting convened expressly for the purpose of which due notice shall have been given, order that within the jurisdiction of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1960 (HC)

S.B. Choudhury and anr. Vs. I.P. Changkakati and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : 1960CriLJ1551

..... an affidavit through the counsel for the complainant. in the affidavit a certificate is given to the effect that he refused permission under section 123 of the indian evidence act to produce the said documents this averment clearly indicates that the privilege was claimed by him. no particular form is prescribed for claiming any such privilege and ..... assam, shillong. item no. 74 is dossier personal folder and all other papers and documents regarding detention of sri moinul haque chowdhury produced before the advisory board under the preventive detention act. these documents were called for from th chief secretary to the government of assam, shillong or special superintendent of police, c. i. d,, shillong.the ..... person may be detained for a period longer than three months under any law providing for preventive detention without obtaining the opinion of an advisory board in accordance with the provisions of sub clause (a) of clause (4).clause (4)(a) provides for the constitution of an advisory .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 1961 (HC)

Thokchom Bira Singh and ors. Vs. Manipur Administration

Court : Guwahati

..... the mob- none of the other appellants were mentioned by name lathe said report . a case was registered under sections 144/149/332/342 and 307, ipc and section 7 of the .criminal law amendment act and p.w. 40 the c. i. started investigation. p.w. 49. went to the civil hospital at 7-30 p.m. and found ..... charges framed at the second trial against bira singh in the sessions court were for distinct offences though on the same facts- the first trial, was under section 188 ipc for violation of the order under section 144, which violation was said to have caused obstruction, annoyance and injury to persons lawfully employed and also danger to human life ..... the police and on the inter state police wireless station again showed their common object to cause injury and rioting and mischief. in fact, in the definition under section 141 ipc the first, third, fourth and fifth objects have been clearly proved in this case by the evidence of innumerable witnesses. it. is not possible for the prosecution to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 1963 (HC)

Senairam Doongarmal Agency (P.) Ltd. and Others Vs. K.E. Johnson and O ...

Court : Guwahati

..... ." these rules are as follows :"s.r.o. 1953. - in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1) of section 59 of the indian income-tax act, 1922 (xi of 1922), the central board of revenue hereby makes the following rules for the purposes of sub-section (2) of section 37 of the said ..... prepared by the income-tax department is annexed hereto and marked "f" ...... your petitioner states that the income-tax officials seized and removed original contracts, hundis, railway receipts, receipts vouchers, title deeds, which were in a loose form without making any list and without taking any signature of your petitioners employees thereon.(iv) in ..... the petitioner company was carrying on extensive business as wholesale dealers of various foodgrains, mustard oil and other commodities having its sales depot as well as its own railway siding at the siding bazaar, tinsukia. the petitioner-company was being regularly assessed with income-tax from year to year, by the income-tax officer, dibrugarh, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1963 (HC)

Sardarmal Khumchand Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Assam, Tripura and ...

Court : Guwahati

..... , an affidavit and an application have been filed along with the petitions for condoning the delay under section 5 of the limitation act. in the circumstances of the case we are of opinion that even if the applications are filed beyond time, these are cases ..... cases and they can be disposed of by one judgment.the short point which requires consideration is whether section 67a of the act applies to the present case and whether the applicants were entitled to the exclusion of the time which they required for obtaining ..... 67a is similar to the language of section 12(2) of the indian limitation act. in the case of jijibhoy n. surty v. t. s. chettyar interpreting the provision of section 12 of the limitation act it was held by their lordships that in reckoning the time for ..... mehrotra c.j. - these three rules arise out of the applications under section 66 of the indian income-tax act, 1922 (hereinafter called "the act"). the petitioners in the rules nos. 1(m) and 2(m) of 1963 are the same. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1963 (HC)

Shri Gauranga Chandra Deb Vs. Tripura Administration

Court : Guwahati

..... actually saw the entry, it cannot be said that the entry has been proved. the fact of the entry can be proved like any other fact. under section 3 of indian evidence act, a fact is said: to be proved when, after considering the matter 'before it, the court either believes it to exist, or considers its existence so probable that a ..... ref. no. 17 of 1960, the last of which is reported in 1962 (1) cri lj 673 (tri). in the said decision, this court, has no doubt held that the indian passport act and rules make it an offence to enter or attempt to enter india from outside without a valid travel document, whether the accused was an ..... remained in india after the period permitting his stay in india had expired, he cannot be held liable under section 6(a) of the indian passport rules. he will have to be proceeded against under the foreigners act or other law relating to foreigners. but the petitioner did not attempt to prove that he entered with a valid) travel document and it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1963 (HC)

Krishna Ram Das Vs. the State

Court : Guwahati

..... notice of the authorities concerned.6. i am also constrained to notice that the charge in this case was framed under section 304 indian penal code. if it is the prosecution case that the act of the accused in inflicting the injuries on the person of the deceased caused the death of the deceased, obviously the charge should ..... this appeal is directed against the conviction and sentence passed by the sessions judge lower assam division, gauhati, finding the appellant guilty of the offence under section 325 indian penal code and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for three years.2. the facts of the prosecution case briefly are as follows:the accused is the son of ..... be under section 302 indian i penal code and not under section 304, unless special circumstances are present which clearly and beyond any doubt .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 1964 (HC)

Sudhir Chandra Gupta Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

..... reserved third class compartment and the accused on being asked1 to leave the compartment refused to leave it. thus ha was guilty under section 109 of the indian railways act. the magistrate found that the prosecution has failed to prove that the compartment was a reserved compartment. but he held that as the petitioner had obstructed ..... it is difficult to hold that he refused to leave the compartment which was reserved for other passengers.4. the other ingredient necessary for section 109, indian railways act is not also established in the case. as i have pointed out, the complainant's main grievance was that he was assaulted and the accused1 behaved very ..... had no occasion earlier to produce the pass. the main charges were under section 121, indian railways act and section 323, indian penal code. as i the state has not filed any appeal against the acquittal under section 121, indian railways act and section 323, indian-penal code, it is not for this court in revision to go into the question .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //