Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway board act 1905 section 4 repealed Sorted by: old Court: guwahati Page 1 of about 2,053 results (0.094 seconds)

Kishorilal Bahati Vs. the State

Court : Guwahati

..... that he can support the legality of his action before a court of justice. this dictum of lord atkin applies with equal force to matters arising out of the indian preventive detention act of 1950.9. in another case reported in 'murat patwa v. province of bihar' air (35) 1948 pat. 135, the learned judges of the patna ..... government, may confirm the detention order and continue the detention of the person concerned for such period as it thinks fit under section 11 of the act. where the advisory board reports that there is no sufficient cause for the detention of the persons concerned, the appropriate government is under an obligation to revoke the detention order ..... may confirm the detention order and continue the detention of the persons concerned for such period as it thinks fit. if, on the other hand, the advisory board reports that there is no sufficient cause for the detention of the persons concerned, the appropriate government is bound to revoke the detention order. in that case it .....

Rahman Stores Vs. Commissioner of Taxes

Court : Guwahati

..... date of the order. 4. mr. brahmin has also referred us to another case decided by the patna high court reported in--'bujhawan sah ramnath v. province of bihar', indian sales tax cases, volume i, 1938-1950. there again the order in question was an original order, and not an appellate order. we are unable to apply the principle ..... order. 5. we can only interfere with the order of the commissioner holding that the petition before him as time-barred, under the provisions of section 32(6) of the act, but we are not satisfied that the decision of the commissioner is erroneous. we think the decision of the commissioner is right. accordingly, we reject this petition. 6. ..... of that case are clearly distinguishable from the facts before us. the division bench of the madras high court was dealing with a case under section 33a(2), income tax act, 1922. apart from that, the order before the learned judges was not an appellate order, but an original order. so far as an appeal against an original order .....

Union of India (Uoi), Railway Administration Vs. Assam Valley Supply S ...

Court : Guwahati

..... all further reference on the subject should be made.' it is not disputed that the plaintiffs did not write to the general manager as advised by the secretary to the railway board. the plaintiffs adhered to their notice of the suit which they had sent under section 80, civil p, c. on 3-7-1945. we think it is reasonable to ..... does not contain any reference to the english law of limitation, governing a suit brought against a carrier who has deviated from the agreed route. so far as the indian law of limitation is concerned, we think that it would make no difference even if a carrier were to deviate from the agreed route. a suit for compensation for ..... facts bearing on the question of limitation are before us. all we have to do is 'to apply the appropriate article of the indian limitation act. 7. in order to appreciate the applicability of the relevant articles of the limitation act, it is necessary to set out certain dates. as we have stated, the consignment was despatched on 19-8-1944. it .....

Senairam Doongarmall Vs. the State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

..... drawn, there is a reference to an english case--'renfrew magistrates v. inland revenue commrs.' (1935) 19 tax cas 13 wherein it was held that if a railway passenger met with an accident and was permanently disabled, any damages awarded would be capital receipt, but if he was only knocked down temporarily--say for six months,--during ..... which the assessee was not permitted to carry on when the property was under military occupation. he supported the reasonings given by the member of the assam board of agricultural income-tax--and contended that the temporary sterilisation of the source of income did not involve a capital loss but only loss of its use as ..... an income coming; within the definition of agricultural income as defined under the assam agricultural income tax act which alone is the point for our decision. 14. the indian income-tax act bears no analogy to the assam agricultural income-tax act--and the income assessable under the income-tax is not the same as is liable to be taxed .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ram Kamal Bezbarua and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... nature perfectly distinct from each other, namely, powers to carry on trade as merchants and subject only to the prerogative of the crown to be exercised by the board of commissioners for the affairs of india,--power to acquire and retain and govern territory, to raise and maintain armed forces by sea and land, and to make ..... is concerned, the damage attributed to them is limited to damage to the bungalows and sheds only. 8. towards the end of may, another party of british and indian troops, about 500 to 600 strong, with a large number of motor vehicles, occupied the aforesaid western half of the northern and the western banks. this party ..... of prerogative is raised. they should examine the necessity and the reasonableness of the act in the absence of an act of indemnity. 50. indian decisions which have been cited before us do not support the contention that the expression 'act of state' refers only to acts against foreigners or foreign states. the expression has been used in relation to all .....

Mahboob Khan Vs. Deputy Commissioner and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... dealt with and it was held that there was never any enforceable agreement. the learned advocate-general has further drawn our attention to the annotation of s. 65, indian contract act by pollock and mulla, 7th edition, wherein the learned commentator approved of the view held in the above decisions. 22. mr. ahmed for the petitioner concedes this ..... mandamus the petitioner must state his rights in the matter in question, his demand of justice and the denial thereof.'--'d. parraju v. general manager, b. n. railway', air 1952 cal 610 (h), is a judgment of das j. wherein it was held that article 226 does not supplant ordinary right of -action or remedy and ..... of that article. the petitioner further contends that the order of the deputy commissioner passed on 14-5-1952 being illegal and void, the resolution of the municipal board influenced by the said order is ineffective and that the government's order affirming the order of the deputy commissioner is also without force the initial order itself .....

Manipur State Vs. Laisram Bokul Singh

Court : Guwahati

..... before the court. there is no doubt that any confession made by the respondent before the o/c will not be legally admissible under section 25, indian evidence act, vide - zwinglee ariel v. state of madhya pradesh : air1954sc15 , the words distinctly relating to facts discovered are clearly admissible under section 27 of that ..... effect that the person has been found in possession of the money which has been the subject-matter of theft, the presumption at once arises under section 114, evidence act, that the possessor is either thief or the receiver of stolen property and this presumption when unexplained shall be regarded as conclusive fact vide - fateh mohd. v. ..... with each other through the information but not either of them with the crime.in the course of such a strict construction of section 27, of the evidence act, by precisely limiting the information admissible to so much of it as distinctly serves to connect the accused with the object alone, it sometimes happens that the admissible .....

Chunilall Rajendra Kumar Vs. State of Manipur and anr.

Court : Guwahati

..... have filed additional affidavit in reply to the counter affidavit filed by respondent 1 and it has been reiterated there that every local act is republished in the local official gazette in every state in indian union and the allegation that the petitioners are profiteering merchants has been emphatically denied.11. according to the allegation in para 20 ..... 31-5-1955 in contravention of this court's order in 1956 manipur 13 ((s) air v 43) (a) is also denied.9. the essential commodities act, 1955 (act 10 of 1955) received the assent of the president on 1-4-1955 and was published in the extra-ordinary gazette of india on 2-4-1955 and ..... powers under the manipur foodgrains (movement) control order, 1951, which was issued in the exercise of the powers conferred by section 3. essential supplies (temporary powers) act, 1946, which had been made applicable to manipur earlier were exercised later on also.the manipur government had ordered by this notification of 1951 that no person should export .....

Promode Ranjan Roy Vs. the State

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : 1956CriLJ1393

..... there was no other allegation against him except the allegations contained in the complaint filed by the travelling ticket inspector on which a charge of an offence under section 112, indian railways act had been framed against him.the allegations contained therein did not make out a definite case of an offence under section 112 ..... ordersarjoo prosad, c.j.1. the petitioner in this case has been convicted under section 112, indian railways act and sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days, his conviction and sentence has been upheld on appeal by the learned sessions judge. he was tried on the above charge ..... said that at the relevant time he was going to join his duty and had an authority to travel in the second class. in the petition he says that he boarded a first class compartment as he had been fasting, the day being 'ekadashi', and being in full uniform because of excessive heat of the day he felt uneasy with vomiting .....

Birendra Chandra De and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Guwahati

..... refers to 'unlawful remaining' after a lawful entry. section 443, indian penal code which defines 'lurking house-trespass' provides that whoever commits house-trespass having taken precaution to conceal such house-trespass is said to commit 'lurking ..... premises or had entered lawfully into the same, but remained unlawfully to commit the theft as alleged, that would amount to criminal trespass. section 442, indian penal code says that whoever commits criminal trespass by entering into or remaining in any building is said to commit 'house-trespass'. this 'remaining' undoubtedly ..... property unlawfully remains there with the intent thereby to commit an offence' in section 441 of the indian penal code are very significant. these words would fully cover the case of the appellant birendra and his act would constitute 'criminal trespass' within the meaning of this section, this element having been found to .....