Skip to content


Indian Ports Act 1908 Chapter V - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: indian ports act 1908 chapter v Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 360 results (1.024 seconds)
May 11 2011 (SC)

Apm Terminals B.V. Vs Union of India and anr ,

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-11-2011

the development and operation of container terminals in the major indian ports governed both the cases though at different ports the october 1996 ms chidambaram however urged that the p o ports case was decided on facts which were specific to p of legitimate expectation has no role to play where state action is based on public policy and in the public interest limits of the licensor as notified under indian ports act 1908 and major port trusts act 1963 29 ms chidambaram submitted

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 2011 (HC)

Ai Champdany Industries Limited. Vs. Blancatex A. G. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-21-2011

evidence of the document sections 65 and 66 of the indian evidence act 1872 the court can also draw an adverse affairs of the company an incorporated company carries on commercial activities pursuing such activities involve holding of meetings making deliberations and court under the code of civil procedure 1908 5 of 1908 while trying a suit in respect of the following matters then an appropriate action can be filed under the said chapter before the company law board the board has the power

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 17 2011 (HC)

Jet Airways (India) Limited, a Co. and ors Vs. Mr. Subrata Roy Sahara, ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-17-2011

to be taken away by s 39 2 of the indian arbitration act the court must proceed to interpret the words the present case the provisions of section 37 the relevant portion of which is pari materia relevant portion of section 39 co ors 2002 4 scc 44716 in proceedings under 1940 act an award was made rule of the court i e judgment appearing in s 2 9 of the code of 1908 which defines judgment into the letters patent judgment means the under section 9 in this court for interim measures f chapter ix deals with appeals containing only section 37 which reads

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 12 2011 (HC)

Mrs. Kavitha Mahesh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner Election Commissio ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-12-2011

is only to give effect to section 137 of the indian evidence act 1872 which is one governing both civil and 87 of representation of people act 1951 for short the act the supreme court having held that the provisions of cpc their respective pleadings 11 while the code of civil procedure 1908 undoubtedly provides for procedural aspects of the manner of receiving and manner of examination of witnesses is again regulated by chapter x of the indian evidence act 1872 particularly as under

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 04 2011 (SC)

M/S Interglobe Aviation Ltd. Vs. N. Satchidanand

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-04-2011

bound by the code of civil procedure 1908 and the indian evidence act 1872 section 22e provides that every award of which would otherwise have jurisdiction to decide the cause of action under the law it cannot be said that the parties shall not be bound by the code of civil procedure 1908 and the indian evidence act 1872 section 22e provides that by the respondent before a permanent lok adalat constituted under chapter vi a of the legal services authorities act 1987 lsa

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 25 2011 (TRI)

Post Master, Nagakudaiyan Branch, Vedaranniyam Division and Another Vs ...

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on: Oct-25-2011

the basis of the provision under sec 48 of the indian post office act in which also the plea of the any other cause whatsoever other than the fraud or willful act or default of such officer any suit or legal proceedings under any rules made by the central government under this chapter or b the wrong payment of a money order caused

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 2011 (HC)

Nandlal Rathi Vs. A.T. Gooyee Enterprises

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-30-2011

the power of the code under section 34 of the indian trust act as follows in paragraph 16 their lordships have needs to be stated briefly both the parties brought separate action for their desired relief the appellant before us had filed application for final judgment or decree under the provisions of chapter xiiia in a mortgage suit unless the provisions of chapter

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 12 2011 (HC)

Duncans Industries Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, W.B.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-12-2011

quoted below ldquo 80hhc 1 where an assessee being an indian company or a person other than a company resident in has to be in accordance with the provisions of the act if the income has to be computed in accordance with be made or allowed under any section included in this chapter under the heading cdeductions in respect of certain incomes in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 09 2011 (HC)

S.M.Syed Mohammed Buhari Vs. the Sub Registrar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-09-2011

has also made reliance upon section 2 24 of the indian stamp act 1899 and submitted that when once a deed of the petitioner by way of a gift of a portion of the property in which the second respondent is living on 07 10 1937 the clear prescription of the said act is that in a case of gift involving a donor to costs consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed registration act 1908 section 17 nbsp documents of which registration is compulsory nbsp been made in those provisions dealing with gift coming under chapter xi of the mahomedan law to the factum of evidencing

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 2011 (HC)

Dilipkumar Husmukhlal Mistri and 1 Vs. State of Gujarat and 1

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: May-13-2011

earlier that is not the object of chapter xxa of indian penal code 15 in view of the above discussion we the deputy inspector general of police ludhiana range the relevant portion of the report of the superintendent of police city ii the hyper technical view would be counter productive and would act against interests of women and against the object for which women from settling earlier that is not the object of chapter xxa of indian penal code 15 in view of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //