Indian Penal Code 45 Of 1860 Section 380 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: indian penal code 45 of 1860 section 380 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 823 results (2.104 seconds)Muthoot Finance Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
returned if an application under section 454 of the earlier code of criminal procedure and now section 500 of the bnss returned if an application under section 454 of the earlier code of criminal procedure and now section 500 of the bnss returned if an application under section 454 of the earlier code of criminal procedure and now section 500 of the bnss gold has to be returned if an application under section 454 of the earlier code of criminal procedure and now section 454 of the earlier code of criminal procedure and now section 500 of the bnss were to be filed of course
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Mohankumar M Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
no 1 and it will not attract section 109 of ipc the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and 2 of prevention of corruption act and section 109 of ipc and payment is made directly to the institution through their example the remedy by way of section 115 of the code of civil procedure 1908 this court has held that the in cash on 24 02 2012 in all rs 27 45 500 no explanation was given for having deposited the cash to the known sources of income within the meaning of section 13 1 e of the pc act and in paragraph
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...
Court : Karnataka
no 254 of 2024 traditional norms and values of the indian society laid stress on providing care for the elderly however no 254 of 2024 traditional norms and values of the indian society laid stress on providing care for the elderly however the older persons though the parents can claim maintenance under code of criminal procedure 1973 the procedure is both time consuming neither be assumed nor inferred in favour of the party 45 the reasoning of the punjab and harayana high court that filed by respondent no 2 before the deputy commissioner under section 16 of the act is not maintainable the appeal provision
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Chennakeshava Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
is very clear that if it is only under the indian penal code or under the karnataka police act then bmtf brought to notice of this court that section 5 contemplates penalty for offences in connection with the land grabbing as enumerated complaint discloses commission of offences only under the indian penal code or under the karnataka police act then it will not of this court question no 3 in paragraph 9 nos 45 and 46 wherein it is observed that the state government 192 a of the karnataka land revenue act 1964 and section 420 of ipc no doubt the apex court taken note
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India
Court : Karnataka
new contract and by virtue of section 623 of the indian contract act of 1872 it is the subsequent contract which new contract and by virtue of section 623 of the indian contract act of 1872 it is the subsequent contract which act h specify state grid code consistent with the grid code specified under clause h of sub section 1 of section appropriate commission may if necessary amend the relevant regulations made 45 nc 2024 khc 53048 wp no 11235 of 2024 c of this court speaking through justice swatanter kumar observed 59 section 12 of the act vests the state government with the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s H M Infra Tech Pvt Ltd Vs. H M Tamborine Apartments Owners Associa ...
Court : Karnataka
of cpc and order vii rule 11 d of the code has limited scope and it must be shown that the of cpc and order vii rule 11 d of the code has limited scope and it must be shown that the of cpc and order vii rule 11 d of the code has limited scope and it must be shown that the to notice of this court the discussions made in paragraphs 45 and 46 and so also 54 regarding the scheme of and the trial court in detail discussed with regard to section 14 of the act the counsel also brought to notice be 90 000 square feet which amounts to 1 76 380 square feet and the trial court in detail discussed with
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...
Court : Karnataka
chennai 600040 rep by its sole proprietor dr k sentilnathan5 indian overseas bank central office no 762 annasalai chennai 600 002 c to direct the court office to calculate the duty penaly from the year 2015 to till date pertaining to impounded procedures relating thereto he is also at liberty to file criminal complaints against sridevi dr senthilnathan smt devi anti corruption council manner in which sridevi dr senthilnathan smt devi anti corruption 45 nc 2024 khc 53360 wp no 28962 of 2015 c said notice or the notice thereafter under subsection 4 of section 13 arcil approached the 7th additional chief metropolitan magistrate under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...
Court : Karnataka
chennai is null and void and any person or the indian overseas bank or its agency arcil shall have no right of the karnataka stamp act 1957 i e it attracts penalty for executing etc instrument not duly stamped and they have or at the behest of sridevi sridevi had also filed criminal complaints which were quashed by this court 12 nc 2024 manner in which sridevi dr senthilnathan smt devi anti corruption 45 nc 2024 khc 53360 wp no 28962 of 2015 c 13 arcil approached the 7th additional chief metropolitan magistrate under section 14 of the sarfaesi act by filing criminal misc no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
in completed years residing at address tehsil district state pin code do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under 1 i in completed years residing at address tehsil district state pin code do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under 1 i in completed years residing at address tehsil district state pin code do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under 1 i required to be brought to the notice of the state 45 the above facts and circumstances require this court s intervention 1 3 a certificate issued to a person under sub section 1 shall confer rights and be a proof of recognition
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Lancer Finance Vs. The Competent Authority
Court : Karnataka
under sections 406 420 506 read with section 34 of ipc and section 9 of the act observations are 30 made under sections 406 420 506 read with section 34 of ipc and section 9 of the act observations are 30 made contended that since the respondent no 2 has filed the criminal case against one abhinava kare who was the then s days and additional 15 days of limitation period in total 45 days and contend that even if consent is given the in crime no 156 2015 for the offence punishable under sections 406 420 506 read with section 34 of ipc and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT