Indian Penal Code 45 Of 1860 Section 380 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: indian penal code 45 of 1860 section 380 Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 718 results (1.073 seconds)ismail Amir Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1984(2)BomCR615; (1984)86BOMLR408
in judgments to investigating officers whether objectionable section 397 of indian penal code does not make any distinction between persons who awarding sentence less than minimum prescribed by section 397 of penal code on ground that accused had no previous conviction whether for the offence punishable under s 397 of the penal code was both in fact and in law wrong this is p m and the entire incident was over by 4 45 p m in the examination in chief itself of this wholly undeserved 25 appeal allowed indian penal code xlv of 1860 section 397 criminal procedure code 1973 ii of 1974 sections 1860 section 397 criminal procedure code 1973 ii of 1974 sections 162 353 157 386 397 indian evidence act i of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhav Shankar Sonawane Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR702; (1982)84BOMLR340; 1982CriLJ1762
court in so far as trial for offences under the indian penal code is concerned is to be found as far has been convicted of the offence under section 302 indian penal code and sentenced to imprisonment for life for the said constitution of india 4a section 302 of the indian penal code provides that whoever commits murder shall be punished with death effect of the new provision section 433a enacted by act 45 of 1978 in the code of criminal procedure is that stand dismissed 15 appeal dismissed indian penal code xlv of 1860 sections 302 55 57 criminal procedure code 11 of 1974 the executive and would be contrary to the provisions of section 433a of the code of criminal procedure it is not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGopal Naidu and anr. Vs. King-emperor
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1923)ILR46Bom605
without warrant police officer charged with offence under section 342 indian penal code private defence or justification rules of english common property of others are endangered in my judgment the indian penal code adequately provides the solution of the difficulty 7 reliance the present one to which before the enactment of the code the common law would have applied 216 a full bench of police officers indian penal code 1860 c a no 45 1860 sections 124 a 153 a 153 b 292 293 but after the passing of the indian penal code in 1860 and the criminal procedure code in 1861 sections 22 to publication contains matter which is an offence under either of sections 124 a 153 a 153 b 292 293 295a of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhaskar Pandit Kadam and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1984(2)BomCR769; (1984)86BOMLR467
..... of 1982 is confirmed indian penal code xlv of 1860 sections 300 302 304 299 criminal procedure code 1973 it of 1974 sections 162 161 303 380 540 indian evidence act i of 1872 sections 165 145 testing correctness ..... proved to have committed is one punishable under section 326 of the indian penal code and not under section 307 of the indian penal code the learned advocate also invited our attention to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHaroon Mohamed Memon Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR630
in order to bring home the offence under section 411 indian penal code the prosecution must prove either that the accused present case was charged under section 411 of the indian penal code for having received stolen property viz the said stainless to convict him under section 411 of the indian penal code the question of law that arises therefore is whether in paid should be refunded to the accused indian penal code xlv of 1860 sections 411 and 414 criminal procedure code v be refunded to the accused indian penal code xlv of 1860 sections 411 and 414 criminal procedure code v of 1898 the basis of that evidence alone if the requirements of section 411 of the penal code are fulfilled that it is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Vs. Dahyalal Dalpatram
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR885; 1960CriLJ217
had committed an offence punishable under section 409 of the indian penal code that as the accused was a public servant thereby committed an offence under s 409 of the indian penal code 3 before the learned magistrate the accused contended that with the learned judge section 405 of the indian penal code defines the offence of criminal breach of trust and in of this report ed 15 appeal allowed indian penal code xlv of 1860 sections 409 405 accused collecting amount of fine under section 409 section 409 of the indian penal code 1860 merely requires that there must be entrustment of property to ed 15 appeal allowed indian penal code xlv of 1860 sections 409 405 accused collecting amount of fine from landholder in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Manohar Kashinath Ghodake
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR29
fact that as stated earlier under section 303 of the indian penal code an accused who is undergoing a sentence of will not be covered by section 303 of the indian penal code for which offence death is the only penalty the section 326 read with section 34 of the indian penal code cannot in the circumstances be said to be either severe in appeal no 708 of 1980 accordingly indian penal code xlv of 1860 sections 302 303 55 criminal procedure code ii no 708 of 1980 accordingly indian penal code xlv of 1860 sections 302 303 55 criminal procedure code ii of 1974 and also for the offence under section 307 read with section 149 of the indian penal code for mutilating shiva in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNivrutti Dhondiba Shinde Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1984(2)BomCR722; (1984)86BOMLR462
get protection under the provisions of section 84 of the indian penal code s 84 of the indian penal code reads offence of murder punishable under s 302 of the indian penal code and sentence to suffer imprisonment for life recorded against within the ambit of section 84 of the indian penal code the burden of proving that at the time of commission the jail authorities immediately 14 order accordingly indian penal code xlv of 1860 sections 84 302 plea of insanity burden of authorities immediately 14 order accordingly indian penal code xlv of 1860 sections 84 302 plea of insanity burden of proof accused an offence as he gets protection under the provisions of section 84 of the indian penal code the accused therefore is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Sattar Mohmed HusseIn Vs. Badrinarayan Bansilal and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1962Bom29; (1961)63BOMLR563; 1961CriLJ871; ILR1961Bom841
..... labels to be destroyed 24 order accordingly indian penal code xlv of 1860 sections 482 483 485 486 488 indian merchandise marks act iv of 1889 sections 6 7 trade marks act v of ..... two designs is the test in holdsworth v m crea 1867 2 hl 380 lord westbury said now in the case of those things as to which ..... l r 734 holdsworth v m crea 1867 l r 2 h l 380 payton amp co v snelling lampard amp co 1901 1 a c 308 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.S. Umralkar Vs. Rajkumar Agarwal
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR677
of criminal breach of trust under section 406 of the indian penal code they came in revision to the court of criminal complaint charging the accused under section 407 of the penal code but the magistrate acquitted all the three accused holding breach of trust under section 406 of the indian penal code on the ground of his failure to account for monies must be confirmed and this appeal dismissed indian penal code xlv of 1860 section 407 appeal against acquittal of partner carrying confirmed and this appeal dismissed indian penal code xlv of 1860 section 407 appeal against acquittal of partner carrying on business as partners of m s carriers corporation of india under section 407 indian penal code the learned presidency magistrate 34th court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT