Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian medical council act 1956 section 24 removal of names from the indian medical register Page 1 of about 1,197 results (0.795 seconds)

S.Mahaveer Shivaji Vs. Secretary to the Medical Council of India

Court : Chennai

..... of mandamus to take suitable disciplinary action under section 24 of the indian medical council act, 1956. section 24 of the indian medical council act reads as follows: removal of names from the indian medical register 2 (1) if the name of any person enrolled on a state medical register is removed therefrom in pursuance of any power conferred by or ..... course the prayer has been couched in such terms that the first respondent should be directed to take suitable disciplinary action under section 24 of the indian medical council act, 1956. but such a mistaken prayer will not take away the power of the high court under article 226 of the constitution of india, to ..... writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to conduct detailed enquiry to the parties concerned and merely to take suitable disciplinary action under section 24 of the indian medical council act, 1956 or any other appropriate remedy. for petitioner : party-in-person for respondents : mr.v.p.raman for r1 mr.veera kathiravan for r2 .....

Dr.K.Nedumaran Vs. Medical Council of India

Court : Chennai

..... provisions of the indian medical council act, 1956 and contended that this is not in pari materia with the advocates act, 1961. the indian medical council act, 1956 does not contain any provision regarding the constitution of the state medical councils under this act and the state medical councils are required to be constituted under the state acts. he further ..... or less uniform. the first contention was that their names were found in the state medical register. as per the provisions of the indian medical council act, disciplinary action can be initiated only by the state medical council and not by the mci. without prejudice to the said legal stand, it was stated ..... authority for initiating an action against the petitioners. under section 21 of the indian medical council act, the mci has to maintain the entire medical register containing names of all persons, who are enrolled on the state medical register and who possess recognised degree. this section causes continuous obligation on the .....

Dr. Manish Joshi, Madhurai and Others Vs. the Registrar, Karnataka Med ...

Court : Karnataka

..... throughout the country in view of the section 27 of the indian medical council act is ill-founded and is rejected. 18. section 21(1) of the indian medical council act, 1956 reads as follows:- 21. the indian medical register.- (1) the council shall cause to be maintained in the prescribed manner a register of medical practitioners to be known as the indian medical register, which shall contain the names of all persons who ..... to be made in the prescribed manner by any such person to enter his name in the indian medical register. in exercise of the powers conferred by section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956, the medical council of india with the previous sanction of the central government made the medical council of india regulations, 2000 which was published in the gazette of india on 15-11-2000. part .....

Dr.L.Sudhakar Vs. the Medical Council of India and Two Oth

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... .3. the 1st respondent in its affidavit, called a short reply affidavit, stated that the statutory provisions of the indian medical council act, 1956 ( for brevity, 'the act') provided for an obligation on the medical council of india under section 21 of the act for maintenance of the indian medical register. a reference was made to all the other provisions of the statute including the provisions for appeal to the ..... justice while passing the impugned order stand on a different footing. nothing in the act excludes the operation of the principles of natural justice to any action taken by the indian medical council in exercise of its statutory duties or powers and the provision for removal of names from the indian medical register provide for an appeal to the central government under sub-section 2 of .....

Baharul Islam . Vs. The Indian Medical Association

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... as well as the state enactments. 68 indian medical council act, 1956 (imc act, 1956) (central law) 17. the relevant provisions of the indian medical council act, 1956 ( imc act, 1956 ), read as under: preamble an act to provide for the reconstitution of the medical council of india, and the maintenance of a medical register for india and for matters connected ..... counsel sri. harin p. raval, appearing for the appellants submitted as under: i. that the impugned judgment proceeds on a misplaced interpretation of the indian medical council act, particularly section 10 thereof and is in the teeth of a three-judge bench judgment of this court in dr. mukhtiar chand vs. state of ..... any validity as the state legislature does not possess legislative competence. in other words, the assam act and rules and regulations made under the said act, being in conflict with the indian medical council act, 1956 (imc act, 1956) and the rules and regulations made thereunder, the doctrine of repugnancy as such would .....

Dr. Yash Nigam Vs. Delhi Medical Council

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 113(2004)DLT33; 2004(76)DRJ64

..... scientific system of medicine and all its branches and has qualifications as prescribed in the first, second or third schedule to the indian medical council act, 1956 (102 of 1956); ... ... ... ... ... .(14)`registered practitioner' means a medical practitioner having registerable qualification as prescribed in the indian medical council act, 1956 (102 of 1956) whose name is, for the time being, entered in the register, but does not include a person ..... to consider provisions of the indian medical council act, 1956 (hereinafter to be referred to as, `imc act') and delhi medical council act, 1997 (hereinafter to be referred t as,`dmc act'). the provisions of section 15(1) of imc act require a person holding adequate medical qualifications as per schedule of the act to enroll himself on any state medical register. section 21 of imc act refers to the indian medical register, which is to .....

Dr. Shalik Bhaurao Ade and Others Vs. Medical Council of India and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai

..... decided and save and except present petition, there is no remedy available in law for him. 15. in support of his submissions, mr.chavan has relied upon indian medical council act, 1956, the maharashtra medical council act, 1965, the maharashtra medical council rules, 1967. reliance is also placed upon certain documents to show that there was a compliance by the petitioner of the legal requirements when the appointment order ..... a statement and as projected before the said ethics committee. the ethics committee conducted proceedings in-camera. the allegations against the petitioner are of violation of the provisions of indian medical council act, 1956 and indian medical council (professional conduct, etiquette and ethics) regulations, 2002. the petitioner was also asked to sign a statement already prepared by respondent no.1. at the same time, the petition proceeds .....

Dr. Ramcharan Thiagarajan Vs. Medical Council of India and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... respondent, major pankaj rai (retired), appearing in person would contend as follows: the petitioner has an alternative remedy of an appeal under section 24 of the indian medical council act,1956 (hereinafter referred to as the 'imc act', for brevity), as against the impugned order and hence the petition would have to be rejected on that ground alone. it is contended that the petitioner was ..... mci can be sustained as being in accordance with principles of law and justice.? point no.(i) : the mci is a statutory autonomous body established under the indian medical council act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the "imc act", for brevity) and is functioning under the administrative control of the ministry of health and family welfare of the government of india. its functions are, (i .....

Dr.J.Santhosh Kumar. Vs. the Block Medical Officer.

Court : Chennai

..... register.36. a combined reading of the aforesaid acts, namely, the bombay homoeopathic practitioners' act, 1959, the indian medical council act, 1956 and the maharashtra medical council act, 1965 indicates that a person who is registered under the bombay homoeopathic practitioners' act, 1959 can practise homoeopathy only and that he cannot be registered under the indian medical council act, 1956 or under the state act, namely, the maharashtra medical council act, 1965, because of the restriction on registration ..... of persons not possessing the requisite qualification. so also, a person possessing the qualification mentioned in the schedule appended to the indian medical council act, 1956 or the maharashtra medical council act, 1965 cannot be registered as a medical practitioner under the bombay homoeopathic practitioners' act, 1959, as he does not possess any qualification in homoeopathic system of medicine. the significance of mutual exclusion is relevant inasmuch as .....

Alka Gupta Vs. Medical Council of India and anr

Court : Delhi

..... before this court. in view of the aforesaid order, parties were called upon to assist this court on the correct interpretation of section 24(2) of indian medical council act, 1956 (for short "act, 1956").6. mr. maninder singh, learned senior counsel for mci stated that in the process of assisting this court in terms of the order dated 10 ..... .(c) 1334/2013 has been disposed of. there are doubts about maintainability of w.p.(c) 889/2013 in view of provision of section 24(2) of the indian medical council act, 1956. since the matter has to be reheard, subject to orders of the hon'ble the chief justice, list before the roster bench on 16.01.2014......."5. ..... complaint dated 10th june, 2009 with the dmc in the matter. the impugned decision and order of mci has been passed in an appeal filed under clause 8.8 of indian medical council (professional conduct, etiquette and ethics) regulations, 2002 (for short "regulations, 2002) by respondent no.2-mr. s.p. manchanda, being aggrieved by the order passed .....