Indian Divorce Amendment Act 2001 Section 11 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: indian divorce amendment act 2001 section 11 Year: 2023 Page 1 of about 302 results (2.491 seconds)Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-17-2023
..... 110 the kerala high court inter alia struck down a part of section 10 and permitted christian women to seek divorce on the ground of adultery alone parliament amended the indian divorce act 1869 in 2001 by substituting section 10 with a provision that made various grounds of divorce including adultery available to both the husband and the wife equally .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAisha Malik Vs. Union Of India
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-28-2023
21 of the indian constitution furthermore as i being an indian citizen and as well as being the only custodial guardian the marriage came to be dissolved the copy of the divorce order is produced herewith as annexure a 4 thereafter due submission would submit that he has filed an application seeking amendment of the petition raising a challenge to the communication rejecting country to become a citizen of india the pakistan citizenship act 1951 does not permit surrender of citizenship of any person the process laid down for registration of a child under section 4 1 of the citizenship act 1955 consulate general of pakistan national marriage between the two would take place on 11 04 2002 at dubai united arab emirates uae the petitioners
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAish Mohammad Vs. State Of Haryana
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jun-14-2023
the director general of police an officer drawn from the indian police service who sits at the apex of the state not appreciate why the authorities concerned are unable to update amend the rules with at least the correct official description of services rules 1934 in the instant facts is not an action this court would like to interdict we are hence not said reversion order resultantly whereof by order dated 28 04 2001 the inspector general of police gurgaon range modified the order submissions on behalf of the official respondents r1 to r7 11 per contra learned counsel for the state of haryana and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State Of Jharkhand Vs. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial Pvt. Ltd.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-20-2023
interference under article 226 cases involving blacklisting or imposition of penal consequences on a tenderer contractor or distribution of state largesse the tec in the meeting of the even date recommended annulment of the auction initiated through auction notice dated 25 10 pvt ltd margao further rule 9 12 of mineral auction amendment rules 2017 states that during the second attempt of auction 11 the terms and conditions of the second attempt of action shall remain the same as in the first annulled attempt on a note found in a file dated 27 12 2001 which indicated that there were less than two or three attempt of auction proceeds with the mandate of sub rules 11 and 12 of the m a rules the rules are
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion Of India Vs. Dilip Paul
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-06-2023
supplied page 86 of 10477 if section 165 of the indian evidence act 1872 permits a judge to put questions to territories which have not yet carried out adequate and appropriate amendments in their respective civil services conduct rules by whatever name rule or under the provisions of the public servants inquiries act 1850 as the case may be an authority to inquire purpose of these rules by the notification no 11012 5 2001 estt a dated 01 07 2004 gsr225dated 10th july 2004 section also apply in inquiry or trial of offences under sections 354 and 377 ipc 2 in holding trial of child a officers vide their uo no 20 ssb pers iii 11 4 pers iii dated 06 08 2012 had appointed smt
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. P.n. Shukla Vs. Union Of India
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-30-2023
of the report of commission is extracted below physicians of indian systems of medicine homeopathy ism h xx xx xx our the case took a new turn without there being any amendment in the rules firstly the post of assistant scientific officer 1980 rules which govern the parties no justification for this action was offered by the respondents at the time of hearing was rejected vide order dated 26 06 2001 03 07 2001 10 on different dates from 2002 to 2006 the appellants joining officer discipline 2 m l meena civil engg 30 11 1995 3 a n selwatkar zoology 01 01 1996 4
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State Of Punjab Vs. Principal Secretary To The Governor Of Punjab
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-10-2023
bill 2023 and 2 rules of procedure 4 iii the indian stamp punjab amendment bill 2023 the recommendation of the governor the meeting of a parliament whether after the prorogation or dissolution and its prorogation during the course of a session either punjab universities law amendment bill 2023 and iv punjab police amendment bill 2023 no action was taken by the governor on responsibility for every executive act in england the sovereign never acts on his own responsibility the power of the sovereign is the state legislatures of rajasthan 9 haryana 10 tamil nadu 11 kerala 12 and west bengal13 expressly permit the speaker to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIsolators And Isolators Vs. Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitra ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-18-2023
we need not elaborate on various decisions cited at the bar suffice it would be to take note of the decision of penalty on unsupplied quantity with note that other punitive action as per terms of the tender will be initiated separately respondents in this regard that the said orders dated 19 11 2019 and 21 11 2019 have attained finality do not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion Of India Vs. Manjurani Routray
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-01-2023
the opp party union of india to carry out necessary amendments to rule 4 b in order to make it in juniors respondent no 5 and 6 therein dated 14 02 2001 before the cat vide order dated 04 05 2005 cat the years 1999 2000 and for the years before 2007 11 in any event the fcs has been modified pursuant to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChairman-cum-m.d. Iti Limited Vs. K.muniswamy .
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-02-2023
be interfered with by this court in exercise of judicial review power we make it clear that the roll back cannot given to the decision of rollback by carrying out necessary amendments to the said rules and in particular to rule 35 short the standing orders under the industrial employment standing orders act 1946 in respect of the appellant company the appellant company proposal was approved by the concerned ministry on 20th november 2001 2 a writ petition was filed by the respondents before public sector undertaking psu of the government of india on 11th june 1998 by a circular an amendment was made to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT