Indian Divorce Amendment Act 2001 Section 11 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: indian divorce amendment act 2001 section 11 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 605 results (3.148 seconds)Muthoot Finance Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
returned if an application under section 454 of the earlier code of criminal procedure and now section 500 of the bnss 30 12 2024 and quash the same and all consequential actions taken against the petitioner thereafter interest of justice and equity the gold has to be returned if an application under section 454 of the earlier code of criminal procedure and now
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
in completed years residing at address tehsil district state pin code do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under 1 i requested to look into the transgender act and suggest appropriate amendments to the act of 1969 and the rules framed thereunder to be issued if all the requirements of the transgender act are fulfilled 42 there is an obligation in terms of reads as under 7 issue of certificate of identity under section 7 1 the district magistrate shall issue a revised certificate same 10 any other information you would like to give 11 have you attached affidavit prescribed in form 2 of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Mohankumar M Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
tax returns the same will not attract section 109 of ipc the learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgments it amounts to an abetment under the prevention of corruption act 44 the trial court having considered the material available on b advocate 2 this criminal revision petition is filed under section397r w401of cr p c praying to allow this crl rp ble mr justice h p sandesh criminal revision petition no 118 2024 between dr mohankumar m s o late dr m
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Lancer Finance Vs. The Competent Authority
Court : Karnataka
under sections 406 420 506 read with section 34 of ipc and section 9 of the act observations are 30 made and other proceedings have been initiated without any cause of action it is further contended that the petition filed by the act and paragraph no 30 regarding satisfaction as required by section 3 must be of the government and not that of notice of 23 this court observation made in paragraph no 11 wherein it is held that the effect of the order
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...
Court : Karnataka
no 254 of 2024 traditional norms and values of the indian society laid stress on providing care for the elderly however for the court to take upon itself the task of amending or altering the statutory provisions 36 in dr baliram waman of enforcing the rights under sub section 1 and 2 action may be taken on his behalf by any of the when it is alleged that the conditions mentioned in sub section 1 of section 23 are attached to a transfer existence and m p md nos 1 and 2 of 2015 11 nc 2024 khc 53004 db wa no 254 of 2024
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...
Court : Karnataka
chennai is null and void and any person or the indian overseas bank or its agency arcil shall have no right which the sub registrar sridevi dr senthilnathan smt devi have acted in registering the documents which could never have been registered passed by the senior sub registrar peenya bangalore as per section 33 of the karnataka stamp act 1957 b to declare of the provisions of the security interest enforcement rules 2002 11 nc 2024 khc 53360 wp no 28962 of 2015 c
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...
Court : Karnataka
are more or less the same 6 the original lender indian overseas bank hereinafter referred to as iob had for the on default when arcil exercised its rights under the sarfaesi act that sridevi represented by its promoter dr senthilnathan have indulged passed by the senior sub registrar peenya bangalore as per section 33 of the karnataka stamp act 1957 b to declare 8 2010 executed and registered as document no 3413 2010 11 in book 1 registered on 21 10 2010 in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s H M Infra Tech Pvt Ltd Vs. H M Tamborine Apartments Owners Associa ...
Court : Karnataka
of cpc and order vii rule 11 d of the code has limited scope and it must be shown that the plaint with regard to the interference and whether cause of action has been pleaded or not and whether the plaint averments is not applicable and there was no express bar under section 9 of cpc to seek the relief of bare injunction that in the meanwhile an application under order vii rule 11 of cpc was filed for rejection of the plaint and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCyient Ltd Vs. Karnataka State Electronics Development
Court : Karnataka
be a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act 1956 providing various software services the petitioner was originally incorporated 6 2 2013 22 5 2013 6 9 2013 29 11 2013 5 12 2013 2 5 2014 and 5 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Chennakeshava Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
if the complaint discloses commission of offences only under the indian penal code or under the karnataka police act then it offences under sections 3 and 4 of the land grabbing act and sections 420 and 447 of ipc against the writ 04 1996 27 05 1996 28 08 1997 06 08 2001 02 09 2002 22 06 2004 17 11 2004 and course of trial the special court has taken note of section 420 of ipc as well as sections 2 f and order passed in bangalore metropolitan task force vs k m 11 shivaprakash anr in special leave to appeal crl no s
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT