Indian Contract Act 1872 Section 72 - Judgment Search Results

M/S.Ganesh Cotton Traders., Rep. by Its Proprietor Vs. the General Man ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

judgment, while interpreting the scope of Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, it is held that when there is falls within the scope of Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, as per which, a person to whom money has and he is also liable to pay interest under Interest Act, on such amount retained by him. In that view of the provision under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. In this case, it is not in dispute that a supra), the issue involved in the said case relates to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, therefore, the ratio to his account. In view of the provision under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, this Court is of the

Dakshinamoorthy Vs. the Union of India, Represented by Its General Man ...

Court: Chennai

common law and statutorily provided in Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the petitioner cannot take any exception law and statutorily provided in Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the petitioner cannot take any exception to petitioner was received from Disciplinary Authority, without prejudice to initiate action under Discipline and Appeal Rules. However, after the finalisation of statutorily provided in Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the petitioner cannot take any exception to the same. restitution as recognised in common law and statutorily provided in Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the petitioner as recognised in common law and statutorily provided in Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the petitioner cannot

Alco Chem Ltd. Vs. Hyderabad Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: III(2003)BC508

Act was repealed and reenacted as Section 64-A of the Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930 by Indian Sale of Goods to sue for the 'price of the goods'. If the contract stipulates that if the price of the goods includes the or exported from British India. Section 10 of the said Act permitted addition to or deduction from a contract price of unrebutted. As per Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the amount of export duty collected separately by the defendant the suit would not he justified. In cases arising under Section 61 of the Act. Patna High Court in Bibhuti Bhusan the burden to the consumer stands unrebutted. As per Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the amount of export

State Bank of India Vs. the United Commercial Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR2003Delhi284

the first defendant under the provisions of Section 72 of Indian Contract Act., 1872 or in the alternative from defendant No. rights to invoke the provisions of Section 72 of Indian Contract Act for seeking the refund of the amount paid by protection as envisaged by Section 131 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. We see no merit in this contention because the finding under the provisions of Section 72 of Indian Contract Act., 1872 or in the alternative from defendant No. 2 if the plaintiff is within its rights to invoke the provisions of Section 72 of Indian Contract Act for seeking the refund of recover the suit amount by invoking the provisions of Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act.5. Defendant No. 3 to 10

V. Kanakaiya Chetty and Co. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Represented ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1961Mad398; (1961)1MLJ348

a bailee under Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Further, Sub-clause 3 of Section 72 specifies bailee under Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Further, Sub-clause 3 of Section 72 specifies that plaintiffs suffered loss during this raid, and because of the activities of the thieves. It is true that this is established Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Further, Sub-clause 3 of Section 72 specifies that this responsibility this action are not in dispute. They are enunciated in Section 72(1) of the Indian Railways Act, and, broadly stated, the the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Further, Sub-clause 3 of Section 72 specifies that this responsibility is not affected by anything relating

M/S. G.V. Films Limited, 4, Seshadri Road, Alwarpet, Chennai-600 018 V ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2000]100CompCas257(Mad); 1998(2)CTC518

a Bank arose for consideration in S. Kotrabasappa v. The Indian Bank, : AIR1987Kant236 , and the Karnataka High Court has with interest, In view of section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and whether a constructive trust can arise over liability which partakes the character of a 'debt' under the Act? and (ii) having regard to the nature of the demand In view of section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and whether a constructive trust can arise over a wide not have obtained but for his position which he held. Section 94 of the Trusts Act reads thus:'94. Constructive trusts in to repay the same with interest, In view of section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and whether a constructive

Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Union of I ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1982WLN695

from the hypothetical line drawn on the boundary of the Indian territorial waters. It is succeptible to only one interpretation, viz above the freight have to be described separately in CIF contract, because the goods are required to be stocked at the a writ, but existence of adequate legal remedy under the Act has to be taken into consideration in the matter of quasicontractual right under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, for recovery of the money which, according to the petitioner, refuse to issue the writ of mandamus for such payment. Sections 12 and 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 clearly indicate petition is in fact enforcement of quasicontractual right under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, for recovery of the

Mohanlal Soni and anr. Vs. the Director, Directorate of Urban Land and ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2008(1)WLN329

the one hand and Sections 21 and 22 of the Indian Contract Act on the other and the true principle enunciated one hand and Sections 21 and 22 of the Indian Contract Act on the other and the true principle enunciated is within six weeks in accordance with the provisions of the Act.6. Per contra, stand of the respondents is that the provisions the provisions of Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the contention of counsel for the petitioners is that one Ltd. (supra) while declaring the provisions of Section 13(1)(b) and Section 15(b) of the Act of 1964 ultra vires to Constitution that 'there is no conflict between the provisions of Section 72 on the one hand and Sections 21 and 22 of

Gurunathappa Deekappa Vs. the Dharwar Municipality

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1945Bom197; (1945)47BOMLR38

and his suit clearly falls under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, for return of the money paid under his suit clearly falls under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, for return of the money paid under coercion. provisions of Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act are much wider than the provisions of Section 115 of clearly falls under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, for return of the money paid under coercion. If the Municipality illegally from him, and his suit clearly falls under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, for return of illegally from him, and his suit clearly falls under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, for return of the

Dhrangadhra Municipality Vs. Dhrangadhra Chemical Works Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1988(35)ELT88(Guj); (1988)1GLR388

have noted before. The principle of section 72 of the Indian Contract Act has been recognised.' 51. It is obvious that case, the suit may fall under section 70 of the Contract Act. This contention also cannot be of any assistance to section 72 for the purpose of completing the cause of action as required for such suit. It must be kept in (p. 466) : 'Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, recognised that a person to whom money has been paid, But, even apart from that, when the basic requirements of section 72 are not pleaded by the plaintiff, the suit of indicated above, his effort was to walk out of section 72 and to bring the suit within the sweep of section