Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: Bhanwar Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Another (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1211/2014) DATE OF ORDER : March 3rd, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS ____________________________________ Mr. A.K. Choudhary for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Siddharth Joshi/Mr. H.S. Choudhary/Mr. Khet Singh for the respondent Rajasthan Public Service Commission. Reportable BY THE COURT : In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the technique of modernisation if applied by the RPSC while awarding the marks in the main examination of RAS2012and to direct the respondent Rajasthan Public Service Commission to revise the result of the RAS Main Examination 2012 accordingly and further prayed that the respondent Rajasthan Public Service Commission may be directed to disclose the raw marks of the petitioner and if the marks obtained by the petitioner is lower than 680 to 700, then, expert...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1].14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.CRIMINAL MISC.2nd BAIL APPLICATION NO.10115/2013 (Saint Shri Asharam Bapu versus State of Rajasthan) Date of order :: 10th February, 2014 HONBLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Mr.Ram Jethmalani, Mr.C.V.Nagesh, Mr.J.S.Choudhary, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.Anjani Kumar Singh, Saurabh Ajay Gupta, and Mr.Pradeep Choduhary, counsel for the petitioner. Dr.Pushpendra Singh Bhati & Mr.Rajesh Panwar, Additional Advocates General along with Mr.Pradhuman Singh, Mr.Chandra Sen Rathore and Mr.Mahipal Bishnoi, counsel for the State. Mr.P.C.Solanki & Mr.P.K.Verma, counsel for the complainant. Ms.Mukta Pareek & Mr.Ramdev, I.O.present in person. Reportable This is second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.The petitioner is seeking bail in Session Case No.152/2013 arising out of FIR No.122/2013, P.S.Mahila Thana (West) Jodhpur and 0/2013, P.S.Kamla Market Delhi, pending trial in the Court of Sessions Judge, Jodhpur for offence und...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: (1) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.7/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (2) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.18/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (3) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.19/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (4) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.20/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (5) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.21/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (6) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.22/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara Date of Order :: 19th December, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Vikas Balia ) Mr.Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: (1) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.7/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (2) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.18/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (3) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.19/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (4) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.20/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (5) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.21/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (6) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.22/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara Date of Order :: 19th December, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Vikas Balia ) Mr.Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.197/2012 Bhanwar lal Vs. Ram Avtar Date of Order ::06. h December, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Manoj Bhandari, for the petitioner. Mr. C.P. Soni, for the respondent. ---- BY THE COURT: This revision petition under Section 115 CPC is directed against order dated 24.09.2012 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Merta City, whereby, the application filed by the petitioner under Order VII, Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed. The facts in brief may be noticed thus: the plaintiff Ram Avatar filed a suit for eviction, arrears of rent and mesne profit against the petition-defendant after complying with the requirements of Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 ('the T.P. Act'); an application under Order VII, Rule 11 CPC was filed by the petitioner on 14.09.2011, inter alia, with the averments that earlier an application was filed under Order VII, R...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.394/2000 Chananmal Vs. Bimla Date of Judgment ::28. h November, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Nitin Trivedi, for the appellant. Mr. Sunil Beniwal, for the respondent. ---- BY THE COURT: This appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ('the Act') is directed against judgment and decree dated 27.05.2000 passed by the Additional District Judge, Nohar, District Hanumangarh, whereby, the petition presented by the appellant seeking dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce has been rejected. Brief facts of the case may be noticed thus: the appellant- petitioner filed a petition under Section 13 of the Act without specifying any clause of the said section, inter alia, with the averments that marriage between the parties was solemnized on 14.07.1978 and, on the next day of the marriage, which was solemnized at her village, she came to her in-laws' place and st...
Tag this Judgment!