Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to take the petitioner's husband, namely, Pandi Durai to private hospital for further treatment to his ailment at the cost of the petitioner by considering the representation given by the petitioner dated 21.05.2016.) All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human persons. (United Nations - Covenant on Civil and Political rights - UNICCPR) 1. The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to permit the petitioner's husband, namely, Pandi Durai to take treatment in a private hospital at the cost of the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. Brief Facts: 3. The petitioner's husband, namely, Pandi Dur...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the Juvenile Justice Board, Tirunelveli, to accept the surrender and consider the bail application to be filed the petitioner, on the same day on merits in Crime No.15 of 2017, on the file of the respondent police.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the Juvenile Justice Board, Tiruneveli, to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider their bail application on the same day in connection with Crime No.15 of 2017 on the file of the 2nd respondent police. A case has been registered against the petitioners, who are juveniles, under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 355, 323 and 506(ii) IPC read with Sections 3(1)(x) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Amendment Act, 2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3. When a specific question was posed as...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer:Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgement and Decree dated 28.02.2012 made in A.S.No.91 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Srivilliputhur, confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.137 of 2005 dated 27.06.2008 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Srivilliputhur.) 1. The defendant in the suit in O.S.No.137 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Srivilliputhur, is the appellant in this second appeal. 2. The respondent herein as plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that the suit properties belongs to the plaintiff and for recovery of possession. 3. The case of the respondent/plaintiff as culled out from the plaint, are as follows: 3.1. The suit properties belonged to the grandfather and grandmother of the plaintiff. The grandparents of the plaintiff had three sons and one daughter. Till 1977, the suit properties were enjoyed in common. By a registered partition, all the family pr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for records relating to C.C.No.121 of 2012 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, and quash the same.) 1. CASTRATE CHILD ABUSERS Blood curdling, horrific, sadistic, terrifying, shocking, cruel and brutal gang rapes of toddlers in New Delhi, in October, 2015 would definitely justify this Court to suggest castration as an additional punishment for child abusers ?, especially, child rapists ?. This Court could foresee that the suggestion of castration would be surely condemned, censured and criticised as barbaric, punitive, draconian, cruel, retrograde, stone aged, cannibalistic, inhuman, etc. ?. Inspite of many penal laws and the recent POSCO Act, 2012 prescribing severe punishment for crimes against children, the number of such cases has increased from 38,172 in 2012 to 58,224 in 2013 and to 89,423 in 2014. When law is ineffective and incapable of addressing the menace, this Court cannot keep its hands fo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer:-Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Manadamus calling for the records pertaining to the communication dated 09.06.2015 issued by the 1st respondent and to quash the same and consequently, to direct the first respondent to register the pending Document No.45/2012 on the file of the 1st respondent in connection with the property comprised in UDR S.No.98/3 of an extent of 3723 sq.ft situated at Vandiyoor II Bit Village in Resurvey No.246/3 A comprised in Patta No.377 and to return the original documents to the petitioner.) 1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the communication dated 09.06.2015 issued by the 1st respondent (Sub-Registrar, Theppakulam) directing the petitioner to produce No Objection Certificate from the Wakf Board for registration of the Sale Deed executed by the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:- 2-1. The petitioner is the Society viz., Madurai...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in registering the impugned cancellation deed of sale in Document No.876/2000 dated 25.02.2000 executed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further direct the 1st respondent to make corresponding entry in the Book No.1 of his office and pass orders on merits.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the writ petitioner seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in registering the impugned cancellation deed of sale in Document No.876/2000 dated 25.02.2000 executed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further direct the 1st respondent to make corresponding entry in the Book No.1 of his office and pass orders on merits. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the owner of nanja lands to an extent of 25 cents on the western side in Re-survey No.115/10...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned orders in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-1; Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-2; Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-2; Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-2 respectively, as well as the consequential order in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-3 passed by the 2nd respondent both dated 20.06.2016 and quash the same.) 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioners; the Learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 and the Learned Counsel for the Third Respondent. 2. The Petitioners have preferred the present writ petitions seeking to call for the records relating to the impugned orders in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-1; Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-2; Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-2; Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-2 respectively, as well as the consequential order in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-3 passed by the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 04.01.2016, passed in I.A.No.973 of 2015 in M.C.O.P.No.2275 of 2015, by the learned VI Additional District Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Madurai.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 04.01.2016, passed in I.A.No.973 of 2015 in M.C.O.P.No.2275 of 2015, by the learned VI Additional District Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Madurai. 2. The petitioner/Insurance Company is the second respondent in the M.C.O.P. The respondents are the claimants. They filed a claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.50 lakhs as compensation for the death of one Chandran @ Ramachandran, due to the accident occurred on 12.06.2014. The petitioner filed I.A.No.973 of 2015 to accept the affidavit filed by them and pass orders on the jurisdiction issue. 3. According to the petitioner, the accident occurred within...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer in W.P.No.11481 of 2008 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the return of request for the approval of appointment of the petitioner in the post of Waterman in fourth respondent School in his proceedings in O.Mu.No.2902/Aa3/06, dated 07.06.2006 on the file of the third respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to approve of the appointment of the petitioner as Waterman in the fourth respondent School from the date of the appointment, i.e., 16.09.2004. Common Order: The issue involved in all these writ petitions relates to the appointment and approval of non-teaching staff in Aided Minority and Non-Minority Schools governed by the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 and the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Rules, 1974 framed in exercise of the powers conferred under...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayers: Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the 3rd respondent pertaining to the order passed by him vide his proceedings in Se.Mu.No.821/A1/1025, dated 03.09.2015, quashing the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondents 1 to 3 to register the petitioner Mission under Juvenile Justice Act and Tamilnadu Hostels and Homes for Women and Children (Regulation) Act, 2014, in accordance with law, based on the relevant records submitted by them, within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court., W.P.(MD)No.20895 of 2015: Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 7th respondent Central Bureau of Investigation to investigate into the trafficking and illegal confinement of 89 girl children by the 9th respondent and consequently to direct the 1st respondent to restore the children living in ...
Tag this Judgment!