Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-10-2014
..... mail, postage prepaid, to beneficiary. any amendment reducing the amount of this guarantee or otherwise limiting or impairing beneficiary s rights hereunder shall not be effective, unless consented to in writing by the ..... request by the obligee, on or prior to the current expiraty date, the guarantee shall be extended, in which case we will provide beneficiary with an amendment hereto. any notice to beneficiary in connection with this guarantee shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand with receipt acknowledged, or by registered ..... of justice. fraud is an act of deliberate deception with a design to secure something, which is otherwise not due. the expression "fraud" involves two elements, deceit and injury to the person deceived. it is a cheating intended to get an advantage. (vide dr. vimla vs. delhi administration air1963sc1572 indian bank vs. satyam fibres (india .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-10-2014
..... mail, postage prepaid, to beneficiary. any amendment reducing the amount of this guarantee or otherwise limiting or impairing beneficiary s rights hereunder shall not be effective, unless consented to in writing by the ..... request by the obligee, on or prior to the current expiraty date, the guarantee shall be extended, in which case we will provide beneficiary with an amendment hereto. any notice to beneficiary in connection with this guarantee shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand with receipt acknowledged, or by registered ..... of justice. fraud is an act of deliberate deception with a design to secure something, which is otherwise not due. the expression "fraud" involves two elements, deceit and injury to the person deceived. it is a cheating intended to get an advantage. (vide dr. vimla vs. delhi administration air1963sc1572 indian bank vs. satyam fibres (india .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-09-2014
..... that the petitioners were also claiming that pending decision of the state government on applications for second and subsequent renewals under section 8(3) of the mmdr act filed prior to the amendment with effect from 18th july, 2014 of rule 24a(6), the said mining leaseholders should be allowed to operate their respective mining leases. however upon our ..... of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of mining, ..... *in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:9. h december, 2014 % + w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) .... petitioner through: dr. abhishek manu singhvi, sr. adv. with mr. anand varma & mr. tarun patnaik, advs. versus union of india & ors. ..... respondents through: mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-09-2014
..... that the petitioners were also claiming that pending decision of the state government on applications for second and subsequent renewals under section 8(3) of the mmdr act filed prior to the amendment with effect from 18th july, 2014 of rule 24a(6), the said mining leaseholders should be allowed to operate their respective mining leases. however upon our ..... of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of mining, ..... *in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:9. h december, 2014 % + w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) .... petitioner through: dr. abhishek manu singhvi, sr. adv. with mr. anand varma & mr. tarun patnaik, advs. versus union of india & ors. ..... respondents through: mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-09-2014
..... that the petitioners were also claiming that pending decision of the state government on applications for second and subsequent renewals under section 8(3) of the mmdr act filed prior to the amendment with effect from 18th july, 2014 of rule 24a(6), the said mining leaseholders should be allowed to operate their respective mining leases. however upon our ..... of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of mining, ..... *in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:9. h december, 2014 % + w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) .... petitioner through: dr. abhishek manu singhvi, sr. adv. with mr. anand varma & mr. tarun patnaik, advs. versus union of india & ors. ..... respondents through: mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-09-2014
..... that the petitioners were also claiming that pending decision of the state government on applications for second and subsequent renewals under section 8(3) of the mmdr act filed prior to the amendment with effect from 18th july, 2014 of rule 24a(6), the said mining leaseholders should be allowed to operate their respective mining leases. however upon our ..... of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of mining, ..... *in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:9. h december, 2014 % + w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) .... petitioner through: dr. abhishek manu singhvi, sr. adv. with mr. anand varma & mr. tarun patnaik, advs. versus union of india & ors. ..... respondents through: mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-09-2014
..... order passed by any officer under this act', the words 'any order passed, scheme prepared or confirmed or ..... vires since the procedure contemplated by s. 36 of the act has not been followed. in our opinion there is no justification for this argument. section 42 of the act as amended by act 27 of 1960 authorised the state government to interfere with the scheme of consolidation or repartition made under the act. what the amending act has done is to substitute for the words 'any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-09-2014
..... order passed by any officer under this act', the words 'any order passed, scheme prepared or confirmed or ..... vires since the procedure contemplated by s. 36 of the act has not been followed. in our opinion there is no justification for this argument. section 42 of the act as amended by act 27 of 1960 authorised the state government to interfere with the scheme of consolidation or repartition made under the act. what the amending act has done is to substitute for the words 'any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-09-2014
..... about the contingency when the office of vice-chancellor becomes vacant due to death or resignation. clause 6.2 (iii) of the regulations 2010 has not been amended by regulations of 2014 vide notification dt.1st may 2014. the aforesaid clause specifically provides contingency in case of office of regular vice chancellor becoming vacant. hence, ..... be a substitute of a regular person. keeping the post vacant for such a long period near about two years is contrary to the object of the ugc act and regulations of 2010. it would adversely affect the standard of education. lnipe was established with an object to provide excellence in imparting sports education. it is ..... have been framed by the university grants commission in exercise of powers conferred under clauses (f) and (g) of sub- section (1) of section 26 of the ugc act. the relevant provisions read as under :- "(f) defining the minimum standards of instructions for the grant of any degree by any university; (g) regulating the maintenance of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-09-2014
..... that the petitioners were also claiming that pending decision of the state government on applications for second and subsequent renewals under section 8(3) of the mmdr act filed prior to the amendment with effect from 18th july, 2014 of rule 24a(6), the said mining leaseholders should be allowed to operate their respective mining leases. however upon our ..... of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of mining, ..... *in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:9. h december, 2014 % + w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) .... petitioner through: dr. abhishek manu singhvi, sr. adv. with mr. anand varma & mr. tarun patnaik, advs. versus union of india & ors. ..... respondents through: mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!