Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Dec-17-2014
..... as, it has not disclosed the pendency of criminal cases against it. it is to be noticed that the petitioner, though has filed rejoinder affidavits and application seeking amendment, it has not either averred or produced the copies of first information report of the cases filed against it. in s.p. chengalwaraya naidu (dead) by lrs ..... company and not to 2 grant exclusive privilege of wholesale supply of liquor to other tenderers during the pendency of the writ petition. later on, an amendment application being i.a. no. 5678 of 2014 was filed for addition of a further prayer seeking quashing of licenses issued in favour of m/s ..... . 6 & 7 are also under challenge. brief facts2 m/s chhatisgarh distilleries ltd., a company duly incorporated under the companies act, 1956, is engaged in the manufacturing of portable spirit, country liquor and indian made foreign liquor. claiming sufficient financial, technical and infra structural capacity, the petitioner has asserted that it was awarded tender for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Dec-11-2014
..... or the date of expiry of the maximum period allowed for first renewal, whichever is earliest. however, amended rule provided that this shall not apply to renewal under sub section (3) of section 8 of the mmdr act, 1957. further amendments were brought in rule 9 of the said rules. the state government through its letter dated 20.08. ..... to the petitioner, the said letter indicates that the state government had in principle taken a decision to renew mining lease of the petitioner. in the meantime, the indian bureau of mines (in short ibm) gave a report on 28.08.2014 in terms of mc rules 1960 recommending grant of renewal in favour of the petitioner. further ..... mining lease, the petitioner-company submitted an application on 17.12.2009 for grant of renewal of the mining lease. in the meantime, the report of the indian bureau of mines was also received by the state government and the state government itself wrote a letter to the central government opining that the condition contained in section .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Nov-28-2014
..... of the petitioner was granted a mining 2 lease at mosabani on 16.6.1939. under section 3(1) of the indian copper corporation (taking over of management)act, 1972 the management and undertaking of the indian copper corporation limited was taken over and stood transferred to and vested in the central government with effect from 21.09.1972. ..... for 3rd renewal of the mining lease for surda copper mines was submitted on 18.03.2013, which is under consideration of the state government. in view of the amendment in rule 24 a (6) of the mineral concession rules, 1960, a direction was issued to the petitioner to stop mining operations. the application submitted by the ..... surda copper mines can be taken by the state government. 7. in reply, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that, once a favourable report from indian bureau of mines is received indicating that it would be in the interest of mineral development to grant renewal of the mining lease in favour of the petitioner, all .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Nov-21-2014
..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Nov-21-2014
..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Nov-21-2014
..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Nov-21-2014
..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Nov-21-2014
..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Nov-21-2014
..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Nov-21-2014
..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. ..... wholly without jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12. .....
Tag this Judgment!