Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 3 amendment of section 2 Sorted by: old Court: central administrative tribunal principal bench new delhi Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 13 results (0.520 seconds)

Jan 02 2014 (TRI)

Deepaindra Kumar, Ghaziabad (Up). Vs. Union of India Through the Secre ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Jan-02-2014

..... october, 2004, we are inclined to agree with the views expressed by the central administrative tribunal, as confirmed by the high court, that having regard to the amended provisions of sub- rules (6) and (7) of rule 10, the review for modification or revocation of the order of suspension was required to be done ..... the disciplinary authority seeks to suspend an employee, pending inquiry or contemplated inquiry or pending investigation into grave charges of misconduct or defalcation of funds or serious acts of omission and commission, the order of suspension would be passed after taking into consideration the gravity of the misconduct sought to be inquired into or ..... of suspension made by the comptroller and auditor-general in regard to a member of the indian audit and accounts service and in regard to an assistant accountant-general or equivalent (other than a regular member of the indian audit and accounts service), where the order of suspension is made by an authority lower than .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2014 (TRI)

Dr. (Mrs.) Vasudha Gupta, New Delhi Vs. Union of India Through Secreta ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-2014

..... it will be justified to give retrospective effect to reintroduction of the note below schedule-iii with effect from 12th october, 1991, the date the indian information service (group a?) amendment rules, 1991 had come into force. further, the said provision in the revised format was to be introduced from the 25th march, 1996, the ..... the constitution bench in m. nagaraj (supra) is a categorical imperative. the stand that the constitutional amendments have facilitated the reservation in promotion with consequential seniority and have given the stamp of approval to the act and the rules cannot withstand close scrutiny inasmuch as the constitution bench has clearly opined that articles 16( ..... . as seniority and promotion have a close nexus, the seniority of the applicant stands to be permanently affected for rest of her service career by this act. the respondent no.1 had committed a grievous wrong by submitting a proposal to the respondent no.3 on the basis of illegal seniority list wherein the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2014 (TRI)

U. Das S/O Late Sh. U.C. Das, New Delhi Vs. Union of India Through Sec ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-2014

..... cwp no.1966/2007 against the order of this tribunal passed in oa no.516/2006 wherein the honble high court stayed the order of the tribunal qua amendment of the recruitment rules. the respondents submit that this has clearly established that even though the tribunal had not granted any relief to said r.s. atal, ..... and the chargesheet was issued to the applicant on 28.01.2011. the respondents have strongly rebutted the charges of institutional malice and have submitted that they have acted in the best interest of the government. 5. the applicant has filed a rejoinder application wherein he has contested the claim of the respondents that he was ..... and that of the chargesheet; the chargesheet had been issued just 48 hours before his retirement indicating malice on part of the respondents; the respondents have further acted in violation of the principles of natural justice in as much as they have failed to consider the representation of the applicant before issuing the chargesheet; the applicant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2014 (TRI)

Sddhartha Dey Vs. Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Finan ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Jan-28-2014

..... clarification no.(ii) issued thereon should not have been pressed into service by the respondents while considering the applicants claim for additional to and fro fare. as per the amended provision, an employee is entitled to an additional fare by the entitled class for both onward and return journeys, in addition to the normal transfer t.a. entitlement, ..... applicants claim for additional to and fro fare was required to be considered in terms of paragraph 7 of annexure to the o.m. dated 24.11.1986 as amended vide the ministry of finance, department of expenditure, o.m.no.19030/1/2006-e.iv dated 6.2.2006 read with corrigendum no. 19030/1/2006-e. ..... the respondents, instead of settling his transfer ta bill, made frivolous reference to the vigilance section of the applicants parent department and asked for information under r.t.i act through third party to delay the final settlement of his transfer t.a.bill. however, presumably when the t.t.a.bill was being settled sometimes in november 2009, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2014 (TRI)

Ravinder Kumar, New Delhi Vs. Union of India, Through the Home Secreta ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Feb-20-2014

..... das vs. usha rani banik and others [2006 (4) scc 78], this court made a reference to explanation added to order 47 by the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1976 and held : "in order to appreciate the scope of a review, section 114 cpc has to be read, but this section does not even adumbrate the ambit ..... 8.2012 is nowhere in challenge and has not even been appended to this ra. there is no order in the instant review application restraining the respondents from acting in any manner against the applicant. to the contrary, there is permission from the tribunal granted to the respondents to proceed against the applicant from the stage of ..... meantime, the respondents had proceeded to pass another order dated 17.8.2012 of compulsory retirement against him, when the matter was pending consideration before the tribunal. this act on the part of the respondents is contumacious of the tribunal and, therefore they deserve to be proceeded with. 6. on the other hand, the learned counsel appearing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 2014 (TRI)

Mahatma Mahto, New Delhi Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council (Ndmc) Throug ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Mar-25-2014

..... /scheduled tribes order, 1950, it was reiterated. a slight modification was made in that behalf by the presidential notification dated 29-10-1956. in the 1976 amendment act, there is no substantial change except removing the area restriction. thus mahadeo koli, a scheduled tribe continued to be a scheduled tribe even after independence. the ..... against a seat reserved for scheduled caste on the basis of caste certificate obtained by him. he was subsequently promoted and included in the cadre of indian police service (ips). the government of kerala on the basis of a complaint received, ordered a full fledged anthropological inquiry into the caste status of the ..... of conduct regulated from time to time with their own rich cultural heritage, mode of worship and cultural ethos. the constitution guarantees to them, who are also indian citizens, equality before law and the equal protection of law. though articles 14 and 15(1) prohibit discrimination among citizens on certain grounds, article 15(4 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2014 (TRI)

Kuntesh, Kishan and Another Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Depa ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Mar-28-2014

..... be followed strictly in the matter of engagement of casual employees in central government offices.11. department of personnel training will have the power to make amendments or relax any of the provisions in the scheme that may be considered necessary from time to time.8.2 the office order no.b-plim(2 ..... and could not be appointed as yet due to non-availability of vacancy since 1995 under the said quota. it is further stated that pharmacopoeial laboratory for indian medicine and homoeopathic pharmacopoeia laboratory are two independent establishments. in reply to paragraph 4.7 of the o.a., the respondents state that the vacancy was ..... to casual labourers with temporary status. however, if any additional benefits are admissible to casual workers working in industrial establishments in view of provisions of industrial disputes act, they shall continue to be admissible to such casual labourers.7. despite conferment of temporary status, the services of a casual labourer may be dispensed with .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2014 (TRI)

Dinesh Kumar Upadhyay, Raipur (C.G.) Vs. Union of India Through Secret ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2014

..... challenged before this tribunal and the same was allowed on the grounds that there was no proof of the delivery of the order and that the leave rules as amended w.e.f. 30.10.2004 would not have retrospective effect and stood to prejudicially affect the interest of the applicant. the respondents challenged the tribunals order before ..... in the facts and circumstances of the present case. 3. the case of the applicant, in very brief, is that he is an officer of 1989 batch of the indian forest service allocated to tripura cadre. during the course of his service, the applicant was kidnapped and sustained gun- shot injuries in his chest by the terrorist of the ..... 08.2007 was issued. on the same date, a communication was received from the applicant indicating his willingness to join his duties and requesting the respondent no.2 to act accordingly. when the applicant failed to join his duties, a show cause was issued to the applicant with a direction to join his parent cadre within thirty days .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2014 (TRI)

R. Shyamala Joint Director Tt-ii, Ministry of Railways, Rail Bhawan, N ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2014

..... 15. we have reconsidered the aforesaid issues untrammeled by the earlier observations/findings of coordinate bench of this tribunal. in our considered view, without carrying out the necessary amendments in the rbsss rules, 1971, the executive instructions to that effect will only remain as executive instructions and it will not partake the character of statutory rules. by ..... the central administrative tribunal, ahmedabad in transfer application no. 263 of 1986 dated 14-8-1987, by means of an application under s. 19 of the act wherein there was no prayer for setting aside the judgment dated 14-8-1987 of the administrative tribunal. it is true that the judgment given by the central ..... mishra and ors. 1987 (supp.) scc 257 is different. in the said judgment the apex court held that while merger or bifurcation of a cadre is an executive act, the govt. has to take steps for framing proper rules. again, when the conditions of service are changed, the proviso to article 309 of the constitution would .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2014 (TRI)

Santosh Ku. Agarwal, New Delhi and Another Vs. Ministry of Railways Th ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2014

..... analyse the merits and demerits of any candidate. 8. the respondents, first of all, state that the guidelines prescribed by the railway board for posting of drms, as amended from time to time, read as follows: (i). postings of drms should be made by considering the suitability of sag officers of all departments batch by batch. from ..... since both oa no.4366/2013 and oa no.270/2014 raise the same issue, they are being disposed off by this common order. 2. the applicants belong to indian railways service of engineers (irse) of 1982 batch. the railway prepares a shortlist of officers of different categories i.e. irse, irts, irsme etc. every year through which ..... mal vs. general manager, northern railway, new delhi, air 1977 sc 1701. we are not, however, persuaded by this argument as section 22 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 clearly stipulates that this tribunal shall have power to regulate its own procedure and not bound by the procedure laid down in the code of civil procedure, 1908 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //