Court : Jharkhand
..... steps have been taken for retendering the process of appointment of distribution franchisee which has led the petitioners to prefer the instant interlocutory applicationx praying therein for amendment in the writ application as also for stay of the retendering process.6. mr. s. pal, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner ..... 3.4. in this context, mr. pal, learned senior counsel has referred to the judgment rendered in the case of mahabir auto stores and others vs. indian oil corporation and others reported in (1990) 3 scc752 in which it was held that every action of the state or any instrumentality of the state in ..... of jharkhand, having his office at nepal house, doranda, po & ps doranda, ranchi, jharkhand 5.direct media distribution ventures (p) limited, a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956, having its registered office and/or carrying on business at continental building , 135, dr. annie besant road, po & ps worli, district mumbai 400 011, maharashtra 6 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the opposite party no. 2 was directed to incorporate the amendment in the relief portion. against the aforesaid order of amendment, the petitioner preferred an appeal under section 29 of the act being cr. appeal no. 324 of 2013 and the learned sessions judge at dhanbad vide judgment ..... expenses incurred for their children namely kumar aanjaneya and aparajita sinha. subsequently, an amendment application was filed by the opposite party no. 2 herein with a prayer for amending the monetary relief claimed under section 20 of the act. the said amendment application was allowed by the learned chief judicial magistrate, dhanbad vide order dated ..... and other expenses incurred for their children. an application was filed by the complainant for amendment with respect to monetary relief under section 20 of the act and on 19.08.2013, an order was passed in the said amendment application by the learned chief judicial magistrate, dhanbad, wherein the same was allowed and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... that too, before completion of the tender process declare and decide the representation preferred by the petitioner before the appropriate authority (respondent nos.2 &3) seeking amendment in the recently floated global tender e- global tender notice no. pur/53/112137(12-13) mine slope stability monitoring radar/global/116, dated 24-01- ..... someone; or whether the process adopted or decision made is so arbitrary and irrational that the court can say: the decision is such that no responsible authority acting reasonably and in accordance with relevant law could have reached ; (ii) whether public interest is affected. if the answers are in the negative, there should ..... po & ps- ballygunge, dist.-kolkata 700 029(w.b.) ... ... petitioners versus 1. m/s bharat coking coal limited, a company registered under section 617 of companies act having its office at koyla bhawan, koyla nagar, po-koyla nagar, ps-saraidhella, dist.- dhanbad 2. chairman cum managing director, m/s bharat coking coal limited, koyla .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... , there is no statutory right, exercise of which was being fettered. there is no term in the contract which is contrary to the provisions of the indian contract act. the indian contract act merely provides that a person can withdraw his offer before its acceptance. but withdrawal -28- of an offer, before it is accepted, is a completely ..... employer exclusively through the issue of an addendum pursuant to clause 10 and not through the minutes of the pre-bid meeting.16. clause 10 deals with amendment of bidding documents and it clarifies that before the deadline for submission of bids, the employer may modify the bidding documents by issuing addenda. whether the clarifications ..... justice to the petitioner.2. during the pendency of the writ application, an interlocutory application being i.a. no. 4200 of 2015 was filed seeking for amendment in the writ application in view of the development which has taken place subsequent to the filing of the writ application and which came to the knowledge of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... registered as sessions case no.11 of 2005.3. initially charge under section 302/34 of the indian penal code was framed on 1st march, 2005, but the charge was amended on 8th november, 2006 and altered under section 302/149 of the indian penal code. the prosecution, in order to substantiate the charge, examined altogether seven witnesses, including ..... hembrum, boarizore p.s. case no.76 of 2004 dated 15th august, 2004, corresponding to g.r. no.776 of 2004, under section 302/34 of the indian penal code was registered against the appellants. the police after due investigation submitted charge sheet; accordingly, cognizance was taken; the case was committed to the court of session ..... general and vague statement has been given by aforesaid witnesses. they have not stated specifically as to which of the accused caused assault and what was the overt act committed by them. instead of giving clear picture, they have taken a safer side and said 3 that all the appellants came to the place of occurrence .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the order of debarment was stayed by interim order dated 25.09.2012.4. respondent state also got an opportunity to file counter affidavit to the amended writ petition. respondent no. 4 appeared on notice, but according to the learned counsel appearing on his behalf, has been instructed not to contest.5. ..... others 3. (2008) 12 scc500(kisan sahkari chini mills limited & others vs. vardan linkers and others) 4. (2009) 1 scc150(karnataka state forest industries corporation vs. indian rocks) 5. (2011) 5 scc697(union of india and others vs. tantia construction private limited 6. (2015) 4 scc136(kailash nath associates vs. delhi development authority & ..... of the issue involved, necessary relevant factual matrix of the case shorn off unnecessary details, is also being delineated hereinafter. following the mandate of motor vehicles act, 1988, central motor vehicle rules, 1989 and motor vehicles (new high security registration plates) order 2001, state of jharkhand also initiated the process for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... took forcible possession and raised construction blocking municipal road and drainage, which lead to dispossession of the defendant / respondent no.2, corporation. defendant/ corporation was allowed to amend the written statement vide order dated 21.1.2013 (annexure-o) on its dispossession in respect of m.s. plot no.1735. it also filed an additional written ..... defendant no.1, as is obvious, has also taken objection of the rectification deed questioning its legality as being in teeth of section 26 of the specific relief act.11. the sequence of fact, which emerged from the pleadings on record and briefly referred to herein above, therefore, does give an impression that defendant no.1/ ..... .2011 (annexure-l) alleging that the deed of rectification was fraudulent, illegal, null and void and barred by the provision under section 26 of the specific relief act. issues have been recast on 5.3.2011. certain witnesses were adduced by the plaintiff, such as p.w.3 and only thereafter, the defendant no.1/ .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the state. the petitioner, who is accused for offence under sections 420, 406/34 of the indian penal code and 138 of the n.i. act, prays for anticipatory bail expressing apprehension of his arrest in connection with bermo p.s. case no.101 of 2016, pending in the court of ..... of 2017 has been filed under order vi rule 17 read with section 151 of the cpc on behalf of the appellants with prayer to make necessary correction and amendment in the address of the appellant nos.1 to 15. learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the aforesaid application with a liberty to file fresh interlocutory application. ..... .2017. heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the state. the petitioner, who is accused for offence under section xxxxx of the indian penal code, prays for anticipatory bail expressing apprehension of their arrest in connection with cxxxxxx, pending in the court of learned xxxxx., xxxxx. the aforesaid case has been .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... as, it has not disclosed the pendency of criminal cases against it. it is to be noticed that the petitioner, though has filed rejoinder affidavits and application seeking amendment, it has not either averred or produced the copies of first information report of the cases filed against it. in s.p. chengalwaraya naidu (dead) by lrs ..... company and not to 2 grant exclusive privilege of wholesale supply of liquor to other tenderers during the pendency of the writ petition. later on, an amendment application being i.a. no. 5678 of 2014 was filed for addition of a further prayer seeking quashing of licenses issued in favour of m/s ..... . 6 & 7 are also under challenge. brief facts2 m/s chhatisgarh distilleries ltd., a company duly incorporated under the companies act, 1956, is engaged in the manufacturing of portable spirit, country liquor and indian made foreign liquor. claiming sufficient financial, technical and infra structural capacity, the petitioner has asserted that it was awarded tender for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... on account of energy dues and other allied dues. on initiation of the certificate proceeding and after issuance of notice under section 7 of the act, the petitioner has filed the instant application seeking amendment in order to challenge the letter no. 07 dated 19.02.2015 issued by the certificate officer (electrical & revenue) i.d. karandih, ..... of india vs. satyawati tondon & ors., reported in (2010) 8 scc110, cicily kallarackal vs,. vehicle factory, reported in (2012) 8 scc524 cct, orissa and ors. vs. indian explosive ltd., reported in (2008) 3 scc688 bindesh kumar singh vs. the state of bihar & ors., reported in 1995 (1) pljr86 the tata iron & steel company ltd. ..... costs to the opposite side. the courts have very wide discretion in the matter of amendment of pleadings but court s powers must be exercised judiciously and with great care.63. on critically analysing both the english and indian cases, some basic principles emerge which ought to be taken into consideration while allowing or .....
Tag this Judgment!