Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 3 amendment of section 2 Court: jharkhand Page 31 of about 371 results (0.194 seconds)

Om Prakash Agarwala Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2195

..... 'the secretary who is the complainant of this base has granted sanction as required under section 49 of the said act. the secretary is authorized to grant sanction under rule 132 of the said rules as amended in 1996.'it cannot therefore be disputed that the complaint was filed by the secretary though in the name of ..... signature the complaint was filed is authorized to grant sanction under rule 132 of the rules under the act as amended in 1996 and he has accordingly granted sanction for prosecuting the accused persons as required under section 49 of the act.3. on receipt of the complaint, by order impugned dated 12.2.2002 the chief judicial ..... duties of the market committee to bring prosecution or defend, in any proceeding.10. rule 132 (as amended by the notification of 1996), prescribes the authorities who are empowered to sanction prosecution and reads as under:rule 132 of the act : authorities empowered to sanction prosecution : the following shall be substituted in the place of rule 132 .....

Shyam Murmu Vs. Raska Tuddu and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR454(Jhr)]

..... allowed to lead evidence in support of his case then the very purpose of the provisions of the code of civil procedure shall be defeated and the object of various amendments made in the code shall be frustrated.7. for the aforesaid reasons, i do not find any error of law or error of jurisdiction in the impugned order passed by .....

Anup Kumar Sahu Vs. Smt. Bhagirathi Devi

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2007(2)JCR109(Jhr)]

..... 17 read with section 151 of the code of civil procedure has not been made applicable to the proceedings under the consumer protection act, the court does not have the jurisdiction and power to grant amendment.3. the forum has been created as an alternative dispute redressal forum. nevertheless, the nature of proceedings before the forum continue to ..... . since proceedings under the consumer protection act are primarily of civil nature and it being the court of civil jurisdiction it does have the inherent power to do justice. in absence of any specific bar, in appropriate cases, it can exercise such power to allow amendment to do justice. denial of such power to the court of ..... (2) that the amendment amounts to change the nature of the proceedings. with a view to canvass the first question reference is made to section 13(4) of the consumer protection act, 1986 which, inter alia, reads as under:(4) for the purposes of this section, the district forum shall have the same powers as are vested .....

Omec Engineers Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : (2008)217CTR(Jharkhand)144; [2008(1)JCR221(Jhr)]

..... any penalty impossible under sub-section (i) shall be imposed by the joint commissioner. 10. section 273b, which was inserted by taxation laws (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1986, however, provides that no penalty shall be imposed if the assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for the said failure. section 273b ..... mean a cause which is beyond the control of the assessee. 'reasonable cause' obviously means a cause which prevents a reasonable man of ordinary prudence acting under normal circumstances, without negligence or inaction or want of bona fides. before imposition of penalty under section 271, the assessing officer must be satisfied, ..... section 271d is not attracted unless the appellant proves that there was a reasonable cause for failure of compliance as contemplated under section 273b of the act. the appellate authority, therefore, affirmed the order of penalty. the assessee then preferred second appeal before the income-tax appellate tribunal. the tribunal .....

Ram Badan Singh Vs. Kuldip Singh,

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2007(2)JCR172(Jhr)]

..... for declaration of right, title and possession in respect of a property was not maintainable without impleading the deputy commissioner, who is a necessary party in view of the amendment brought in order i rule 3 of the code of civil procedure by bihar regulation, i of 1969. learned counsel submitted that though the said point was not raised ..... when deni singh died. the said defendant no. 2 sold the suit land to the defendant no. 1 after obtaining permission under section 46 of the chota nagpur tenancy act and on receipt of consideration amount by virtue of registered sale deed dated 13.01.1984 (exhibit 'a') and 06.02.1984 (exhibit a/1). it has been ..... payment of a single farthing, purportedly transferring the suit land. the defendant no. 1 had also fraudulently managed to obtain permission under section 46 of the chota nagpur tenancy act.3. the defendant no. 1 contested the suit. his case was that deni singh married thrice. his first marriage was with tileya devi and out of the said wedlock .....

Siya Ram Agarwal and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2009(1)JCR601(Jhr)]

..... therefore, be said that the petitioner is prevented by the principles of res-judicata from filing a second application after incorporating the additional prayer by way of amendment of their plaint. furthermore, since the plaintiffs have claimed to discharge their onus by adducing evidence in support of their claim that an area of two decimals ..... of his earlier prayer and the writ application was withdrawn by him without decision on merits, the withdrawal was made on account of petitioners' need to amend their plaint in order to incorporate a further prayer for declaring the entries in the revenue records as incorrect. unless the entry in the municipal records was ..... petitioners to approach this court to file a writ petition. pursuant to the orders passed by this court in the subsequent writ application, the prayer for amendment was allowed and the further prayer as mentioned above was incorporated in the plaint.6. learned counsel for the respondent-state submits that since earlier a similar .....

Kamod Prasad Sinha Vs. Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... the relevant facts of the case, in terms of rule 73 of the bihar service code, the age of superannuation of the government employees was 58 years consequent upon the amendment of rule 73 of the code, the age of superannuation of the officers and employees of the state government was enhanced from 58 years to 60 years and a notification .....

Serajul Sheikh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR484(Jhr)]

..... sub-section shall not, in the first instance exceed three months, but the state government may, if satisfied as aforesaid that it is necessary so to do, amend such order to extend such period from time to time by any period not exceeding three months at any one time.(iii) when any order is made by ..... it considers to be against the public interest to disclose.12. apart from the provision of section 17 of bihar (jharkhand) control of crimes act, 1981, article 22(5) of the indian constitution provides that when any person is detained in pursuance of an order made under any law providing for preventive detention, the authority making the ..... the application of minds.6. the respondents appeared and filed their respective counter-affidavits.7. initiating his argument mr. sharma, learned senior counsel submitted that the indian constitution has guaranteed personal liberty to its citizen in article 21 by speaking that no person shall be deprived of his life of personal liberty except according to .....

Jagdish Singh Raghubanshi and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR530(Jhr)]

..... , the petitioners came to know that the deputy commissioner, ranchi passed an order on 29.11.2007 whereby the revision application was dismissed and under that situation, an application for amendment bearing i.a. no. 3452 of 2007 was filed whereby the order dated 29.11.2007 passed by the deputy commissioner, ranchi-respondent no. 6 was also sought to be ..... the petitioners, was initiated vide c.c. no. 2 of 1996-97. in the said proceedings the petitioners filed objection under section 9 of the bihar & orissa public demand recovery act but that was also rejected and, therefore, the petitioners preferred a revision application before the deputy commissioner, ranchi which was admitted on deposition rs. 61,468 and consequently further proceeding .....

Debabrata Dasgupta Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2009(1)JCR281(Jhr)]

..... petitioner was reverted to the post of assistant professor. the petitioner filed an interlocutory application bringing the aforesaid facts regarding the subsequent developments. his prayer for amending his original writ application to incorporate the facts relating to the subsequent developments and also to include a further prayer for quashing the annexures 9 and ..... same was not disturbed by the respondents and in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner cannot claim that the respondents have committed any act of contempt of the lawful order passed by this court.5. annexure-b filed with the counter affidavit of the respondents is the purported 'reasoned order ..... to the m.c.i. regulations 1983 (annexure-12) which are regulations prescribed by the medical council of india under section 33 of the medical council act, 1966 and approved by the government of india vide notification dated 05.06.1971, regarding the qualifications required for appointment of a person to the post .....