Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 11 amendment of section 11 Year: 2003 Page 64 of about 660 results (0.457 seconds)

Mpl Cars Limited Vs. Commercial Tax Officer

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu

Reported in : (2004)134STC418Tribunal

..... substituted. entry 8 of part g of the first schedule imposes 20 per cent tax on cars imported from outside india but sold within. by act no. 22 of 2002, further amendments were carried out and section 3c2-c) was introduced as a charging provision in the case of goods mentioned in the eleventh schedule. part g ..... , (3) in the course of inter-state trade and commerce and (4) in respect of essential commodities." the inter-state or intra-state commerce within the indian territory is the object behind part xiii of the constitution of india. the decisions cited by the petitioners stated supra would prove that for proper taxation throughout india without ..... held : "...........sovereign power which gives the states sufficient authority to enact any law subject to the limitations of the constitution to discharge its functions. hence, the indian state as a sovereign state has power to legislate on all branches except to the limitation as to the division of powers between the centre and the states and .....

B.E. Billimoria and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Cent ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... department's case. the answer to the department's case is mentioned in paragraph 32 of the said judgment. it mainly deals with the constitutionality of the 46th amendment and also the effect of the new definition introduced under clause (29-a) of article 366. that is not the point for our consideration before us. ..... decisions referred to herein is annexed as annexure "8." 11. alternatively it was respectfully urged by the appellants that the amending notification no. 51 of 1995 had amended the said earlier notification no. 51 of 1995 had amended the said earlier notification 59 of 1990, was in fact clarificatory in nature since the word "building" was removed ..... this case. he states that in that case the question that arose was for whether the 46th amendment to the constitution of india was ultravires the constitution of india and interpretation of article 286, the provisions of the central excise act and article 366(29)(a) of the constitution and no point was raised, argued, considered and .....

Brown Vs. Legal Foundation of Wash.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of the washington supreme court, the foundation, which receives and redistributes the interest on iolta accounts, and the president of the foundation. in their amended complaint, brown and hayes describe the iolta program, with particular reference to its application to lpos and to some of the activities of recipient organizations ..... , in pennsylvania, the state legislature passed the original program but the pennsylvania supreme court took over the program in 1996, suspending the state statute and amending the rules of professional con- 223 charitable entities providing legal services for the poor. the aggregate value of those contributions in 2001 apparently exceeded $200 ..... interest, however minuscule the amount might be. in 1995, the washington supreme court amended its iolta rules to make them applicable to limited practice officers (lpos) as well as lawyers. lpos are nonlawyers who are licensed to act as escrowees in the closing of real estate transactions. like lawyers, lpos often .....

Dr. R. Bhardwaj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Lucknow

Reported in : (2004)(3)SLJ211CAT

..... that the original prayer in the present o.a. was only for placement in the selection grade of jr.administrative grade and the relief claimed by the amended o.a. for promotion to the sr. administrative grade constituted a separate relief unconnected with the original prayer because an officer becomes eligible after putting in requisite ..... . administrative grade.2. pleading on record have been perused and learned counsel for the parties have been heard.3. the applicant belongs to 1981 batch of the indian railway traffic service. he was promoted in 1986 to the sr. time scale and on 17th october, 1991, was promoted further to the jr. administrative grade.the ..... which are reproduced below: "the principle is well settled that in accordance with the rules of natural justice, an adverse report in the confidential report cannot be acted upon to deny promotional opportunities unless it is communicated to the person concerned".20. the above principle was relied upon by the apex court in the subsequent .....

Wiggins Vs. Smith

Court : US Supreme Court

..... " with respect to ineffectiveness claims, the court relies upon a case-williams v. taylor, supra-that postdates the maryland court's decision rejecting wiggins' sixth amendment claim. see ante, at 522. the court concedes that williams was not "clearly established federal law" at the time of the maryland court of appeals' ..... that his attorneys' failure to investigate his background and present mitigating evidence of his unfortunate life history at his capital sentencing proceedings violated his sixth amendment right to counsel. in this case, we consider whether the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit erred in upholding the maryland court ..... petitioner renews his contention that his attorneys' performance at sentencing violated his sixth amendment right 520 to effective assistance of counsel. the amendments to 28 u. s. c. 2254, enacted as part of the antiterrorism and effective death penalty act of 1996 (aedpa), circumscribe our consideration of wiggins' claim and require us .....

Lawrence Vs. Texas

Court : US Supreme Court

..... under the texas "homosexual conduct" law-which criminalizes sexual intimacy by same-sex couples, but not identical behavior by different-sex couples-violate the fourteenth amendment guarantee of equal protection of the laws. 2. whether petitioners' criminal convictions for adult consensual sexual intimacy in the home violate their vital interests in ..... perfectly legal; that proposals to ban such "discrimination" under title vii have repeatedly been rejected by congress, see employment nondiscrimination act of 1994, s. 2238, 103d cong., 2d sess. (1994); civil rights amendments, h. r. 5452, 94th cong., 1st sess. (1975); that in some cases such "discrimination" is mandated by federal statute, see ..... 10 u. s. c. 654(b)(1) (mandating discharge from the armed forces of any service member who engages in or intends to engage in homosexual acts); and that .....

Demore Vs. Kim

Court : US Supreme Court

..... al. by anthony j. grler. 513 chief justice rehnquist delivered the opinion of the court. section 236(c) of the immigration and nationality act, 66 stat. 200, as amended, 110 stat. 3009-585, 8 u. s. c. 1226(c), provides that "[t]he attorney general shall take into custody any ..... amendment permits detention only where "heightened, substantive due process scrutiny" finds a "'sufficiently compelling'" governmental need. flores, supra, at 316 (o'connor, j., concurring) (quoting salerno, 481 u. s., at 748). in deciding in salerno that this principle did not categorically bar pretrial detention of criminal defendants without bail under the bail reform act ..... 1231(a)(6) (1994 ed., supp. v)). zadvydas and ma challenged their continued and potentially indefinite detention under the due process clause of the fifth amendment. 553 the zadvydas opinion opened by noting the clear applicability of general due process standards: physical detention requires both a "special justification" that "outweighs the .....

Sri Guru Ram Das Charitable Hospital Trust and ors. Vs. State of Punja ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)136PLR99

..... year 1994-95. same order was repeated for the academic year, 1995-96. the interim order was necessitated by an amendment effect on 20.5.1995 in the karnataka education institution (prohibition of capitation fee) act, 1984 and the rules that had been made thereunder for selection of candidates to medical engineering, dental, pharmacy and ..... becomes redundant. we make it clear that nothing contained in this judgment shall be applicable to the case of foreign students and students who are non-resident indians . we further hold that this judgment will be operative prospectively. all those students who have already been admitted to the private medical colleges in the state ..... the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the punjab government notification dated 25.07.2003, to the extent that it abolishes the non resident indians (hereinafter referred to as the 'nri') quota for the admissions to mbbs/bds courses. the petitions further seek a direction that the admissions be made to .....

Subhash Gupta (individual) Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Reported in : (2003)78TTJ(JP.)692

..... and, therefore, question of levy of penalty would not arise.the above position was also recognised by the legislature and clause (iii) to section 271(1)(c) was amended by finance act, 2002, w.e.f. 1st april, 2003. the corresponding provision of the finance bill i.e., section 101 provided as under: "in clause (c)(iii), for ..... in addition tp tax, if any, payable" shall be substituted w.e.f. the first day of april, 2003." the notes accompanying the finance act, 2002, provided as under in respect of above referred to amendment : "the existing provisions contained in clause (iii) of the aforesaid sub-section (1) provides for a penalty, in addition to any tax payable ..... amount of tax sought to be evaded, for concealing particulars of income, or furnishing inaccurate particulars in respect thereof. sub-section (c) of this clause proposes to amend the said clause (iii) so as to clarify that the penalty referred to therein can be levied even if no tax is payable on the total income assessed." 26 .....

B. Karamchand Piarelal Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Reported in : (2004)91ITD398(Asr.)

..... the onus of proving the explanation to be not bona fide was on the assessee. as per the provisions of expln. 1(b), prior to its amendment by the taxation laws (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1986, w.e.f. 10th sept., 1986, the onus of proving the explanation to be not bona fide was on the revenue and this has ..... by the cbdt in their circular no. 469, dt. 23rd sept., 1986, explaining the provisions of taxation laws (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1986, 1986) 162 itr (st) 21, at p. 38. this was the reason explained for bringing in the amendment introduced w.e.f. 10th sept., 1986. (v) in para 14 of the order, decision of the supreme ..... court in cit v. mussadilal ram bharose (1986) 165 itr 14 (sc) has been quoted for explaining the import of explanation introduced by the finance act, 1964. the said quotation is not relevant .....