Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 11 amendment of section 11 Year: 2003 Page 59 of about 660 results (0.514 seconds)

Jai NaraIn Modi Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2003Raj340; RLW2004(1)Raj373; 2004(1)WLC201

..... judicial courts through wednesbury principle.67. the officials of the state having oblique motives were divested of the responsibility of revenue collection and rules were amended to hand over the same to private individuals. the decision to award contract for less amount lacks good faith also. a higher amount was ..... with, by an appropriateorder in judicial review proceedings wherethe court concludes that the decision is suchthat no authority properly directing itself onthe relevant law and acting reasonably couldhave reached it.'63. the grant of contract provides as a first step a provisional selection. respondent no. 5 was provisionally selected. ..... experience was concerned. it, however, short listed cambatta and air india on the ground that they are indian organisations, operate mainly in india and has better proven adaptability for operating in indian conditions. it then recommended cambatta for undertaking the ground handling services without giving any reason for its preference .....

Dr. V.N. Pradhan Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2108; 2003(2)WLC699; 2003(1)WLN104

..... be dismissed on following two grounds :(i) from perusing the file of the writ petition, it appears that an application for amendment of the writ petition was filed by the petitioner on 12.4.99 and by that application following amendments were sought : 'x. the respondents have failed to pay to the petitioner emoluments of the post of principal of which post .....

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Suresh Chandra and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2157

..... working on daily wages basis and also continued to work on the date of the notification dated 12.10.92 and, therefore, the notification dated 12.10.92, amending rule 10 of the rules, is fully applicable to the writ petitioners.14. in steel authority of india ltd. and ors. v. national union waterfront workers and ..... labour is prohibited either because the industrial adjudicator/court ordered abolition of contract labour or because the appropriate government issued notification under section 10(1) of the clra act, no automatic absorption of the contract labour working in the establishment was ordered; (ii) where the contract was found to be a sham and nominal, rather ..... . 125(6), the apex court held as under :-'if the contract is found to be genuine and prohibition notification under section 10(1) of the clra act in respect of the establishment concerned has been issued by the appropriate government, prohibiting employment of contract labour in any process, operation or other work of any .....

Dayalal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2680; 2003(3)WLC599

..... aided institution, irrespective of the post, whether on the post of addl. superintendent or on the post of assistant superintendent. the state government on 7th june 1996 amended the rules of 1982 and deleted the prefix 'assistant' from the post assistant superintendent. the petitioners claimed that after deletion of the world 'assistant' from the ..... their whole time work. the constitutional provision prohibiting begar under article 23 of the constitution of india, very rarely made base for challenge to such inhuman acts of the states. unfortunate aspect in this matter is that the employees are suffering continuously since decades and the state despite claiming that the state is giving ..... authority to exercise its discretion to grant or not to grant aid in regard to the items covered under section 7(3) and 7(4) of the act.'and, thereafter, held that :-'selection scale being salary, once the state government has decided to grant aid to the ngei (non-government educational institutions), it .....

Purushottam Tamrakar Vs. Shankar Lal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : II(2003)ACC281; 2003ACJ2117

..... died in the accident, his dependants were entitled to claim for compensation by way of filing a civil suit under the general law of torts as well as under indian fatal accidents act, 1855 in the civil court. thus, the civil suit was competent. the civil court had jurisdiction to decide the claim. it was not a case of ..... already become barred by limitation. in the facts and circumstances, the learned trial court had correctly exercised his discretion in dismissing the application for amendment. it is noteworthy that the appellant had admittedly called dr. g.p. tamrakar, dw 2, for treatment and had spent on his own admission, rs. 25,000 in ..... admitted that the deceased was working in his factory. no evidence could be read against pleadings of a party. his application for amendment of pleadings dated 6.3.1995 was dismissed on 3.7.1996 as the amendment was sought to be made at the very late stage when the civil suit against shrilal, the brother of appellant, had .....

Shikhar Chand Falodia and anr. Vs. Sushil Kumar Sanganeria and Brother ...

Court : Guwahati

..... 54.7. refuting the above contentions with equal force, dr. lal has argued that the revision petition, in the face of section 115 of the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 2000 being against an interlocutory order is clearly not maintainable in law, and is liable to be rejected in limine. he further argued that having regard to the orders ..... administer oath to her as it was of the opinion that she did not understand the sanctity of an oath. referring to the proviso to section 5 of the indian oaths act, 1873 (as it was then) which provided that where a child witness under 12 years of age did not understand the nature of oath or affirmation it need ..... in the form in connection therewith would not invalidate any proceeding or render any evidence inadmissible. the indian oaths act, 1873 has been repealed by the oaths act, 1969 and section 13 of the earlier act has been replaced by section 7 of the later act.11. the ratio of the above decision of the apex court therefore is that if there is .....

Madanlal Sharma Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR216; 2004(1)MhLj581

..... the directions of the divisional commissioner, aurangabad, vide his communication dated 26-10-1963. section 253-a came to be incorporated under the maharashtra zilla parishads and panchayat samitis act, 1961, by amendment maharashtra 43 of 1964. the said section deals with the power of state government to allot government servants, etc. for a limited period. the chief executive officer, zilla parishad ..... ) of the pension rules.26. we now come to the last issue of the tribunal's order dismissing the miscellaneous civil application for amendment on the ground of delay. if regards be had to section 21 of the act, there is an enabling provision empowering the tribunal to entertain the applications filed beyond limitation, if the tribunal is satisfied of the reasons .....

P. Shiva Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by the Secretary to Govern ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR3806

..... selection of the selection board, the names of the candidates selected shall be notified to the candidates and panel once so approved, should not normally be cancelled or amended. 10. in this case, after approval of the empanelment of the petitioner for the post of ticket collector, the petitioner was notified about such empanelment and ..... temporary waterman on 25-6-1985. his temporary status was confirmed during 1989. he was empanelled as box boy on 14-4-1991. 2. rule 127 of the indian railway establishment manual ['iremanual' for short], provides that vacancies in the category of ticket collector [a group-c post] will have to be filled, two-thirds ..... whether there was any justification for such deletion or power to make such deletion. 12. the petitioner was not guilty of any fraud, misrepresentation, malpractice or wrongful act. the petitioner had on two earlier occasions was empanelled after written test and vivo voce, but was not selected for want of sufficient vacancies. he again passed .....

Dr. Amar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR2004P& H67; (2003)135PLR348

..... be through draw of lots. the allotment will be made strictly according to punjab town improvement (utilisation of land and allotment of plots) rules, 1983 as amended up to date (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules'). it was also provided that reservation in the categories of schedule castes, backward classes and other categories ..... /their wards, fourteen officers/officials of the huda/their wards and twenty seven defence personnel. these lists also show that as many as six non-resident indians who are living in japan, united states of america, sweden applied for allotment of plots measuring 14 marlas to 1 kanals and they were allotted plots ..... used in favour of eminent professionals, outstanding sports persons, musicians etc. as a group, provided such reservation is within the parameters, scheme and objects of the act. in fact, the policy decision taken by the huda to reserve plots in favour of the government servants, schedules castes, backward classes, freedom fighters falls in this .....

Jibontara Ghatowar Vs. Sarbananda Sonowal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2003(5)SC353; 2003(4)SCALE702; (2003)6SCC452

..... 2001. for no. 115, moran legislative assembly constituency, the appellant, the respondent no. 1 and respondent no. 2 filed their nomination papersrespectively as candidates of the indian national congress, asom gana parishad and nationalist congress party. the respondents no. 3, 4 and 5 filed their nomination papers as independent candidates. the appellant's election ..... been declared. the election petition hasalready been subjected to trial. now, it is for the court to formits own judicial opinion on the issues raised and act in conformitywith the findings arrived at.22. for the foregoing reasons we are of the opinion that thehigh court was not justified in rejecting the prayer for ..... a) do the recounting in accordance withrule 54a, rule 56 or rule 56a, as the casemay be; (b) amend the result sheet in form 20to the extent necessary after such re-count;and (c) announce the amendments to so madeby him. (6) after the total number of votespolled by each candidate has been announcedunder sub-rule .....