Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 11 amendment of section 11 Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 1998 Page 5 of about 77 results (0.329 seconds)

Medical Council of India Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC2423; JT1998(5)SC40; 1998(4)SCALE161; (1998)6SCC131; [1998]3SCR740

..... admission capacity, such person or medical college, as the case may be, shall seek, within a period of one year from the commencement of the indian medical council (amendment) act, 1993, the permission of the central government in accordance with the provisions of section 10a.(2) if any person or medical college, as the case may ..... seeking permission for certain existing medical colleges, etc-(1) if after the 1st day of june, 1992 and on and before the commencement of the indian medical council (amendment) act, 1993 any person has established a medical college or any medical college has opened a new or higher course of study or training or increase the ..... of the impugned judgment where the division bench held that prior to insertion of sections 10a, 10b, and 10c in the indian medical council act, 1956 (for short, the 'medical council act') by the amending act 31 of 1993 neither the central government nor the medical council could fix the admission capacity in the medical colleges in the .....

Union of India and anr. Vs. M/S. Mustafa and Najibai Trading Co. and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC2526; 1998(62)ECC266; 1998(101)ELT529(SC); JT1998(5)SC16; 1998(4)SCALE141; (1998)6SCC79; [1998]3SCR708

..... fraudulent and, therefore, the question of exercising the discretion for extending the period for filling the import manifest as provided under section 30(1) of the act or for considering amendment or supplementation of the manifest would not arise even if a request would have been made for such extension of the time limit for filling of the manifest ..... that had been seized, valued at rs. 59,53,560 c.i.f. and rs. 1,78,60,680 at the indian market rate under clauses (d) and (f) of section 111 of the act as well as for confiscation of the gunny bags, white cloth wrappings, wooden cases and the cartons which were used for keeping ..... under the regulations in any import manifest or import report which are not so mentioned;'6. the expressions 'import', 'import manifest', 'india' and 'indian customs waters' are defined in section 2 of the act in the following terms:-'2(23). 'import', with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, means bringing into india from a place outside india.''2(24 .....

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. the Chief Inspector of Factories and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC2456; 1998(3)BLJR1608; [1998]94CompCas64(SC); (1998)3CompLJ385(SC); 2000(69)ECC247; 1999(113)ELT761(SC); JT1998(4)SC631; 1998LabIC2735; (1998)IILLJ604SC; 1998(4)SC

..... over the affairs of the factory, so that they take proper care for maintenance of the factories and the safety measures therein proviso (ii) was introduced by the amending act, couched in a mandatory form-'any one of the directors shall be deemed to be the occupier'- keeping in view the experience gained over the year as to ..... any person other than the director as the occupier. following the decision of this court in j. k. industries limited and ors. v. the chief inspector of factories and boilers and ors., : (1997)illj722sc , wherein it is held that in the case of company, which owns a factory, it is only one of the directors of the ..... appointed by the central government but by the company. it, therefore, dismissed both the petitions.5. pressing only the second point the learned attorney general submitted that though indian oil corporation is a government company and, therefore, a company as contemplated by clause (ii) of the proviso to section 2(n), its factories would properly fall within .....

Brijlala Pd. Sinha Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998VAD(SC)276; AIR1998SC2443; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)164; 1998(2)BLJR1530; 1998CriLJ3611; 1998(3)Crimes4(SC); JT1998(4)SC534; 1998(4)SCALE25; (1998)5SCC699; [1998]3SCR529

..... fired at the maruti van in consequence of which three innocent persons were killed, and therefore, all of them could be held liable under section 302/34 ipc. on the question of sentence mr., sinha, learned senior counsel submitted that three officers have been rightly awarded the death sentence and the high court perhaps was ..... is established in the chain of circumstances to complete the chain and, therefore, the high court was wholly justified in recording a conviction under section 302/34 ipc. mr. sinha, learned senior counsel also urged that looking at the brutality with which three innocent persons were murdered from a close range by firing at them ..... held responsible? the liability of one person for an offence committed by another in the course of a criminal act perpetrated by several persons will arise under section 34 of the indian penal code only where such criminal act is done in furtherance of a common intention of the persons who join in committing the crime. direct proof .....

WisconsIn Dept. of Corrections Vs. Schacht

Court : US Supreme Court

..... a cause and submits its rights for judicial determination, it will be bound thereby and cannot escape the result of its own voluntary act by invoking the prohibitions of the eleventh amendment." an early decision of this court applied this principle in holding that a state's voluntary intervention in a federalcourt action to ..... and its employees in their "official capacities." the district court granted the motion, stating: "plaintiff agrees his claims for money damages are barred [by the eleventh amendment] but pursues his claims for injunctive relief. plaintiff does not, however, request injunctive relief in his complaint .... defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims against the ..... the situation in which law usually says a party must accept the consequences of its own acts. it would seem simple enough to rule that once a state consents to removal, it may not turn around and say the eleventh amendment bars the jurisdiction of the federal court. consent to removal, it can be argued, .....

Hohn Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... failing to challenge the instruction on direct appeal. while hohn's motion was pending before the district court, congress enacted the antiterrorism and effective death penalty act of 1996 (aedpa), 110 stat. 1214. section 102 of aedpa amends the statutory provision which had required state prisoners to obtain a certificate of probable cause before appealing the denial of a habeas petition. the ..... such "use" under this court's intervening decision in bailey v. united states, 516 u. s. 137. while the motion was pending, congress enacted the antiterrorism and effective death penalty act of 1996, 102 of which amends the statutory provision which had required state prisoners to obtain a certificate of probable cause before appealing the denial of a habeas petition. the .....

Nar Bahadur Bhandari Etc. Vs. State of Sikkim and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998IVAD(SC)600; AIR1998SC2203; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)24; 1998CriLJ3013; 1998(2)CTC189; JT1998(4)SC164; RLW1998(2)SC369; 1998(3)SCALE571; (1998)5SCC39; [1998]3SCR421; 1999(1)SLJ7(

..... an order on 1.7.97 upholding the preliminary objection and expressing the view that the court not having been constituted under criminal law (amendment) act, 1952 hereinafter referred to as the 'act of 1952' lacked jurisdiction to take cognizance of and to try the offences in the present case. consequently, it held that further ..... .ps 146-148: the petitioner in the earlier petitions was the chief minister of sikkim and the petitioner in the later petitions was a member of indian administrative service(sikkim cadre) working at the relevant time as a secretary to the rural development department, government of sikkim.3.cases were registered against the ..... , for exercising powers and jurisdiction in the state of sikkim for investigations of offences punishable under the provisions of the indian penal code specified therein as well as offences under the prevention of corruption act, 1947. the said notification was challenged in a writ petition filed under article 32 of the constitution of india. .....

Indian Bank Vs. the Official Liquidator, Chemmeens Exports (P) Ltd. an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998VAD(SC)72; AIR1998SC2111; [1998]93CompCas76(SC); 1998(2)CTC632; [1998(79)FLR761]; JT1998(4)SC172; 1998(3)SCALE531; (1998)5SCC401; [1998]3SCR255

..... or such application has been made or is made before or after the order for the winding up of the company, or before or after the commencement of the companies (amendment) act, 1960.(3) any suit or proceeding by or against the company which is pending in any court other than that in which the winding up of the company is proceeding ..... of the debt amount in a sum of rs. 29,50,609.58 due to it. the permission having been granted by the company court on 7.12.79, the indian bank filed the said suit, o.s.no. 169/80 in the subordinate judg's court, cochin, against the debtor company in liquidation which was represented by the official liquidator ..... creditors excluding the decree holder.2. it will be necessary to notice the facts giving rise to this appeal for a proper appreciation of the questions raised before us. the indian bank advanced certain amounts to m/s. chemmeens exports pvt. ltd. which was secured by an equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds of the debtor company with the bank .....

Real Value Appliances Ltd. Vs. Canara Bank and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998VAD(SC)121; AIR1998SC2064; [1998]93CompCas26(SC); 1998(3)CTC112; [1998(79)FLR675]; JT1998(3)SC715; (1998)119PLR553; 1998(3)SCALE427; (1998)5SCC554; [1998]3SCR170

..... section 15. the chapter headings cannot, in our opinion, be treated as rigid compartments.30. there can, therefore, be no difficulty in holding mat after the amendment to regulation 19 w.e.f. 24.3.1994, once the reference is registered and when once it is mandatory simultaneously to call for information/documents from the ..... and in regard to the preparation of the balance sheet - could not be accepted inasmuch as these actions 'were permissible under the various provisions of the companies act, 1956 and as such these were valid under law'. the matter was adjourned to enable the company to submit its revival/rehabilitation proposals. these are the ..... a reference before the board for industrial and financial reconstruction (hereinafter called the 'bifr') on 17.7.1997 under the sick industrial companies (special provision) act, 1985 (hereinafter called the 'act'). the said reference was registered on 24.7.1997 as case no. 97 of 1997. the point raised in these appeals is that once the reference .....

Clinton Vs. City of New York

Court : US Supreme Court

..... such cancellation prevents a provision "from having legal force or effect," 691e(4)(b)-(c). thus, in both legal and practical effect, the presidential actions at issue have amended two acts of congress by repealing a portion of each. statutory repeals must conform with art. i, ins v. chadha, 462 u. s. 919 , 954, but there ..... canceled item in the latter, continue to have the same force and effect as they had when signed into law. in both legal and practical effect, the president has amended two acts of congress by repealing a portion of each. "[r]epeal of statutes, no less than enactment, must conform with art. 1." ins v. chadha, 462 u ..... eliminate any lingering financial effect of canceled items. 442 v the government advances two related arguments to support its position that despite the unambiguous provisions of the act, cancellations do not amend or repeal properly enacted statutes in violation of the presentment clause. first, relying primarily on field v. clark, 143 u. s. 649 (1892), the .....