Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 11 amendment of section 11 Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 1998 Page 2 of about 77 results (0.188 seconds)

Nov 19 1998 (SC)

M/S. Rickmers Verwaltung Gmb H Vs. the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-19-1998

Reported in : AIR1999SC504; 1999(1)ARBLR1(SC); (1999)1CompLJ13(SC); JT1998(8)SC85; 1999(2)KLT25(SC); (1999)IMLJ62(SC); (1999)121PLR842; 1998(6)SCALE197; (1999)1SCC1; [1998]Supp3SCR42

..... cost of expenses of the arbitration was reiterated. the first respondent, aggrieved by the communication from the indian council of arbitration dated january 3, 1995, filed a petition under section 33 of the indian arbitration act, 1940, seeking a declaration from the court that there did not exist any concluded arbitration agreement between ..... provided that all disputes under the charter party were to be settled in india in accordance with the provisions of the indian arbitration act, 1940 read with the maritime arbitration rules of the indian council of arbitration, their plea to get the dispute settled by arbitration was well founded. according to respondent no. 1 ..... , indian oil corporation ltd., on the other hand, no arbitration agreement had been executed between the parties and that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 1998 (SC)

State of Bihar and ors. Vs. Steel City Beverages Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-18-1998

Reported in : 1998VIIIAD(SC)371; AIR1998SC235; 1999(1)BLJR10; [1999]235ITR131(SC); JT1998(8)SC49; (1999)IIMLJ15(SC); 1998(6)SCALE184; (1999)1SCC10; [1998]Supp3SCR5; [1999]112STC185(SC)

..... investment in bottles, crates, electrification and tools was an investment in 'plant' and, therefore, it was also a 'fixed capital investment'. the company, therefore, amended the writ petition and challenged that part of the decision of the district level committee which was against it.3. the high court after considering that under the deferment ..... the ministry of industry (department of industrial development) dated 2.4.1991 and 1.1.1993 issued under section 11-b of the industries (development & regulation) act, 1951. notification no. 232 dated 2.4.1991 while stating what has to be included under fixed assets while ascertaining whether a small-scale industrial unit's ..... existing industrial units going for expansion that the state government in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 58 of the bihar finance act, made the deferment rules. an examination of these discloses that they provide for deferred payment of sales-tax in respect of sale of goods manufactured by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 1998 (SC)

State of U.P. Vs. Harish Chandra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-11-1998

Reported in : 1998(2)ARBLR716(SC); JT1998(8)SC74; (1999)122PLR174; 1998(6)SCALE173; (1999)1SCC63; [1998]Supp2SCR660; 1999(1)LC241(SC)

..... learned senior counsel for the respondent-state vehemently submitted that as per section 24 of the u.p. civil laws (reforms and amendment) act, 1976, paragraph 7-a was inserted in the first schedule to the arbitration act, 1940 which barred the power of the arbitrator in granting more than 6 per cent interest on the awarded amount and, therefore ..... for the appellant that the claims regarding cutting of hard rock were wrongly granted, cannot be made subject matter of an objection under section 30 of the arbitration act which could have been agitated for getting any reduction of the amount as awarded by the arbitrator. it was a question purely on merits of the award ..... . he further submitted that interpretation of clause 1.9 by the arbitrator could not have been made a subject matter of objections under section 30 of the arbitration act.7. in view of the aforesaid rival contentions, the following points arise for our determination :-(1) whether the award of interest prior to the date of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 1998 (SC)

R.C. Sahi and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-10-1998

Reported in : 1999(1)BLJR250; JT1998(7)SC527; 1998(6)SCALE96; (1999)1SCC482; [1998]Supp2SCR612; 1999(2)SLJ39(SC); 1999(1)LC228(SC); (1999)1UPLBEC314

..... petitioners (ecos). the reason for this is that the petitioners have been treated as a separate source of recruitment for the central reserve police force, 1955 after their amendment. no question of reservation as such is involved in the recruitment of the petitioners. once they are recruited, the next question is the seniority and pay they ..... that rule 8(b)(i) of the crpf rules only governs the seniority as between army officers inter se, army officers and re-employed army officers inter se, indian police service officers inter se, and non-army and army officers of equivalent rank inter se. the expression 'rank' in this rule means the rank in crpf. ..... to the issue is necessary. the central reserve police force (for short 'crpf'), with which we are now concerned, came into existence under the central reserve police force act, 1949. the crpf rules were framed in the year 1955 to deal with various matters. rule 105 related to appointment and promotion of superior officers. by notification no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1998 (SC)

Ram Badan Rai and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-09-1998

Reported in : 1998VIIIAD(SC)165; AIR1999SC166; 1999(1)BLJR255; JT1998(7)SC478; 1998(6)SCALE71; (1999)1SCC705; [1998]Supp2SCR583

..... on 26.1.50. between the states were clearly made subject to alteration by parliamentary legislation.(i) constitutional amendments 1955, 1956 and the bihar & west bengal (alteration of boundaries) act, 1956:19. by the constitution (fifth amendment) act, 1955, the proviso to article 3 was substituted by a new proviso which read as follows:'provided that no ..... .'20. the words 'specified in part a or part b of the first schedule, were omitted by the constitution (seventh amendment) act, 1956. by virtue of the said seventh amendment act, 1956, article 1(2) was amended as 'the states and territories thereof shall be as specified in the first schedule'. the first schedule was also simultaneously ..... but the map prepared under section 3(4) being an official one, raised only a reputable presumption of correctness in view of section 114 of the indian evidence act. this point was supported by the note of the surveyor-general to the effect that he did not verify the topography; (7) assuming that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 1998 (SC)

Hope Plantations Ltd. Vs. Taluk Land Board, Peermade and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-03-1998

Reported in : JT1998(7)SC404; 1999(1)KLT331(SC); RLW1999(2)SC227; 1998(6)SCALE19; (1999)5SCC590; [1998]Supp2SCR514

..... to examine the claim regarding land interspersed with plantation crops. it was on that account the question had been remanded to state land board for determination. but after the act was amended by amending act 27 of 1979 w.e.f. 7.7.1979 taluk land board was also empowered to examine the claim in question. taluk land board, therefore, could rightly go ..... this court in gopal prasad sinha vs . state of bihar : 1971crilj420 . this case arose out of criminal prosecution, the accused was tried on a charge under section 409 ipc for having committing criminal breach of trust for rs. 27,800/-during the period between january 31, 1960 to november 30, 1960, when he was ..... the section.' 6. as to what is 'rested area', reference may be made to (1) tea encyclopedia of the indian tea associates, scientific department (2) tea planting in ceylon by e.c. elliot and f.j. whitehead and (3) indian tea by claud bald. resting of tea is part of tea plantation. certain areas in tea plantation are rested temporarily .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 1998 (SC)

Whirlpool Corporation Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-26-1998

Reported in : AIR1999SC22; JT1998(7)SC243; 1998(5)SCALE655; (1998)8SCC1; [1998]Supp2SCR359

..... by the appellant in the high court as the said suit could not be treated to constitute, in any manner, 'proceedings' under the act. moreover, the application for amendment, by which the relief relating to infringement of trade mark was sought to be added in the plaint was still pending and unless that ..... legislation brought on the statute book was the indian merchandise marks act, 1889 (act no. 4 of 1889). this was followed by the trade marks act, 1940 (act no. 5 of 1940). both these acts were repealed by the trade & merchandise marks act, 1958. this act follows the pattern of trade marks act, 1938 of the united kingdom. prior to ..... registration problem was tackled by obtaining a declaration as to ownership of a trade-mark under the indian registration act, 1908. the present act which, as pointed out above, has repealed the indian merchandise marks act, 1889 and trade marks act, 1940, also provides in section 129 that any document declaring or purporting to declare the ownership .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 1998 (SC)

Keshav Deo and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-1998

Reported in : 1998VIAD(SC)478; AIR1999SC44; JT1998(7)SC216; 1998LabIC3554; 1998(5)SCALE621; (1999)1SCC280; [1998]Supp2SCR343; (1999)1UPLBEC12

..... years after would supersede the former in the matter of determination of seniority from the date of their appointment against the permanent vacancies. this court quashed the amended rules as well as the seniority lists. in the course of the judgment, this court said that the period of service rendered by the ad hoc appointees ..... members of service and required to wait till selection and appointment as assistant engineers under rule s (a)(ii) against quota fixed by rule 6 of 1969 amendment rules. consequently the assistant engineers appointed several years ago to the temporary posts had to wait until their selection and appointment to permanent posts against the prescribed quota ..... set out above. the service rules applicable in this case are the u.p. services of engineers (buildings and roads branch), class-ii rules, 1936 as amended in 1969 and 1971 hereinafter referred to as rules. rule s provides that recruitment to the post of assistant engineer shall be made by direct recruitment as well .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 1998 (SC)

Dr. Mukhtiar Chand and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-08-1998

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(SC)457; AIR1999SC468; JT1998(7)SC78; 1998(5)SCALE501; (1998)7SCC579; [1998]Supp2SCR143

..... of the said rule, declaring the categories of persons who were practising modern system of medicine invalid in law?2. what is the impact of indian medical council act, 1956 and indian medical central council act, 1970 on rule 2(ee xiii) of the drugs rule's and the notifications issued thereunder? and3. whether the persons who have qualified the ..... be consulted within six months of the making of the rules and the central government shall take into consideration any suggestions which the board may make in relation to the amendment of the said rules.2 without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rule may(a) to (d) *** *** ***(e) prescribe the forms of ..... of drugs and production of spurious and sub-standard drugs which were posing serious threat to the health of the community. the amended definition of 'drug' in clause (b) of section (3) in the drugs act is inclusive and comprehensive but it does not include 'ayurvedic, siddba or unani' drug. indeed, at the time of its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1998 (FN)

Monterey Vs. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Oct-07-1998

..... , deny the landowner just compensation, the government's actions are neither unconstitutional nor unlawful. see williamson, 473 u. s., at 194 ("the fifth amendment does not proscribe the taking of property; it proscribes taking without just compensation"). even when the government takes property without initiating condemnation proceedings, there is ..... government to take property for public use, a taking for that purpose cannot be tortious or unlawful. we reject this conclusion. although the government acts lawfully when, pursuant to proper authorization, it takes property and provides just compensation, the government's action is lawful solely because it assumes a ..... attorney general of new jersey, stefanie a. brand, deputy attorney general, mary c. jacobson, assistant attorney general, dan schweitzer, and gus f. diaz, acting attorney general of guam, and by the attorneys general for their respective jurisdictions as follows: bruce m. botelho of alaska, grant woods of arizona, winston 693 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //