Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order passed by the national commission for minority educational institutions, the R-2 dated 6-6-2016 vide Annexure-A and etc.) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 06.06.2016, passed by the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions, whereby the learned Commission has rejected the petition filed by the petitioner for grant of Minority States Certificate interalia on the ground that the petitioner, which has sought Minority Status as linguistic minorities, is outside the purview of the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004 (for short the Act ). Therefore, the Commission does not have jurisdiction to entertain such a petition. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that, the petitioner is a Trust under the name and style of Indus Trust , which was initially registered on 13.06.2001, and subsequently by amended Trust Dee...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2290/2017 SANDEEP SHOKEEN ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State Mr. Sunil Fernades, Standing counsel for BSES RPL with Mr. Arnav Vidyarthi with Mr. Pradeep Baisoya, authorised representative of respondent No.2-comapny. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER0109.2017 1.2. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has handed over a copy of General Power of Attorney dated 05.07.2017 in favour of Mr. Pradeep Baisoya. Same is taken on record. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the FIR bearing No.559/2014, registered on 26.06.2014 against him with Police Station Najafgarh, South West District, Delhi, under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2003 on the complaint of respondent No.2/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~24 * + 1.2. 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1145/2017 MANOJ BHARDWAJ......... Petitioner Through Mr. Vipin Kumar Anand, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State Mr. Raghav Chadha, Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Baisoya, authorised representative of respondent No.2-comapny. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0109.2017 % Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has handed over a copy of General Power of Attorney dated 05.07.2017 in favour of Mr. Pradeep Baisoya. Same is taken on record. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.79/2015, registered on 18.01.2015 against him with Police Station Neb Sarai, South District, Delhi, under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2003 on th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:16. h July, 2018 Pronounced on:01. t August, 2018 + + CS(COMM) 630/2018 DART INDUSTRIES INC & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Hemant Singh, Ms.Mamta R.Jha, Mr.Pranav Narain and Ms.Shrutttima Ehersa, Advs. versus POLYSET PLASTICS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Jatin Zaveri and Mr.Neelkamal Mishra, Advs. CS(COMM) 631/2018 DART INDUSTRIES INC & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Hemant Singh, Ms.Mamta R.Jha, Mr.Pranav Narain and Ms.Shrutttima Ehersa, Advs. versus POLYSET PLASTICS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Jatin Zaveri and Mr.Neelkamal Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA No.14512/2014 and 10831/2015 in CS(COMM) 630/2018; IA No.14515/2014 and 10849/2015 in CS(COMM) 631/2018 CS(COMM) Nos.630-631/2018 Page 1 of 27 1. The plaintiff has filed this suit against the defendants for infringement of its designs...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Authority for Advance Rulings
Reported in : (2008)(126)ECC216
Appellants: One Stop Airline MRO Support Private Limited Vs.For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: S. Ganesh, Sr. Counsel, For BMR and Associates, Sujit Ghosh, D.K. Ranaand and Sudipta Bhattacharjee, Advs., Stephan Lorenzen, MD, One Stop Airline Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act - Section 3(1) Customs Act - Section 25(1); Central Excise Act - Section 5A; Central Excise Tariff Act - Sections 107 and 108; Indian Aircraft Rules - Rules 2(49), 30, 134(1) and 134(1)(1A); Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Section 13(1)Hemraj Gordhandas v. H.H. Dave, Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Surat 1969 (2) S.C.R. 252 : 1967 (2) E.L.T. P.350; Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai v. Tullow India Operations Limited 2005 (189) E.L.T. 401; Oblum Electrical Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, BombayCollector of Central Excise v. Parle Exports Ltd. 1988 (38) E.L.T. 741; City of Henderson v. George Delker Co., 235 S.W. 732; Collector of Central Excise v. Ballarpur Industries 19...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC451REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.29 OF2021SHAJI POULOSE .. PETITIONER VERSUS INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.267 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.272 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.371 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.581 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.670 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1084 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1200 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1256 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1291 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1295 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1360 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.32 OF2022T.C. (Civil) No.29 of 2021 Etc. 1 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.186 OF2022WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.833 OF2022TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.27 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.28 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.30 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.31 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.32 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.33 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 2706-2716 OF 201.(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) Nos. 20539-20549 OF 2009.NOVARTIS AG .APPELLANT VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS .RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.2728 OF 201.(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.32706 OF 2009.NATCO PHARMA LTD. .APPELLANT VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS .RESPONDENTS AND CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 2717-2727 OF 201.(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) Nos. 12984-12994 OF 2013.SLP(C)../2011 CC Nos.6667-6677 M/S CANCER PATIENTS AID ASSOCIATION .APPELLANT Versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS .RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT Aftab Alam, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.3. What is the true import of section 3(d) of the Patents Act, 1970?. How does it interplay with clauses (j) and (ja) of section 2(1)?. Does the product for which the appellant claims patent qualify as a new product which comes by through an invention that has a feature that involves technical advance over the existing...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1057of2017 JagdishPrasad Petitioner Versus TheC.B.I(A.C.B.)throughSuperintendentofPolice,Ranchi OppositeParty with A.B.A.No.1008of2017 SanjayKumarSingh Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I OppositeParty with A.B.A.No.1012of2017 AnilKumarSingh Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I OppositeParty CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEANANTBIJAYSINGH ForthePetitioners:Mr.AbhishekSinha,Advocate Mr.KumarHarsh,Advocate (inA.B.A.No.1057of2017) Mr.RohitRanjanSinha,Advocate Mr.MohitManiKishore,Advocate (inA.B.A.No.1008of2017) Mr.IndrajitSinha,Advocate (inA.B.A.No.1012of2017) FortheC.B.I :Mr.KailashPrasadDeo,Advocate C.A.V.On:21/06/2017 Pronouncedon29/06/2017 Sinceallthethreeanticipatorybailapplicationsariseoutofoneandthe samecasehencetheyaretakenuptogetheranddisposedofbycommonorder. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with R.C 11(A)/2014Rfortheoffenceregisteredundersections120B,420,468and471 ofthe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1057of2017 JagdishPrasad Petitioner Versus TheC.B.I(A.C.B.)throughSuperintendentofPolice,Ranchi OppositeParty with A.B.A.No.1008of2017 SanjayKumarSingh Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I OppositeParty with A.B.A.No.1012of2017 AnilKumarSingh Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughC.B.I OppositeParty CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEANANTBIJAYSINGH ForthePetitioners:Mr.AbhishekSinha,Advocate Mr.KumarHarsh,Advocate (inA.B.A.No.1057of2017) Mr.RohitRanjanSinha,Advocate Mr.MohitManiKishore,Advocate (inA.B.A.No.1008of2017) Mr.IndrajitSinha,Advocate (inA.B.A.No.1012of2017) FortheC.B.I :Mr.KailashPrasadDeo,Advocate C.A.V.On:21/06/2017 Pronouncedon29/06/2017 Sinceallthethreeanticipatorybailapplicationsariseoutofoneandthe samecasehencetheyaretakenuptogetheranddisposedofbycommonorder. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with R.C 11(A)/2014Rfortheoffenceregisteredundersections120B,420,468and471 ofthe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1098of2017 RajeshKumar Petitioner Versus C.B.I(A.C.B.)throughSuperintendentofPolice,Ranchi OppositeParty with A.B.A.No.1116of2017 SadanandGupta Petitioner Versus C.B.I(A.C.B.)throughSuperintendentofPolice,Ranchi OppositeParty CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEANANTBIJAYSINGH ForthePetitioners:Mr.AbhishekSinha,Advocate Mr.KumarHarsh,Advocate FortheC.B.I :Mr.KailashPrasadDeo,Advocate C.A.V.On:21/06/2017 Pronouncedon:29/06/2017 Sinceboththeanticipatorybailapplicationsariseoutofoneandthesame casehencetheyaretakenuptogetheranddisposedofbycommonorder. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with R.C 11(A)/2014Rfortheoffenceregisteredundersections120B,420,468and471 oftheIndianPenalCodeandundersection13(2)readwithSection13(1(d)of thePreventionofCorruptionAct,1988pendinginthecourtofShriB.K.Tiwary, SpecialJudge,C.B.I(A.C.B),Ranchi. Thecaseofprospection,inshort,isthatoneS.K.Khare,Superintendentof Police/HOB,C.B.I,AC.B,Ranchig...
Tag this Judgment!