Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:23. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 9243/2018 ABHISHEK JAIN ......... Petitioner versus LT. GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Mahesh Prasad and Mr Alok K. Prasad. : Mr Anjum Javed, ASC GNCTD with Mr Devendra Kumar. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a communication dated 29.12.2017 addressed by the Sub- Registrar II (Basai Darapur) to the Collector of Stamps/SDM, Patel Nagar, Old School Building, Ram Pura, New Delhi, impounding the sale deed dated 11.12.2009, executed in favour of the petitioner and one Sh. Subodh Anand in respect of the property bearing No.WZ-15, Kailash Park, Najafgarh Road, Khasra No.2778/738, Village Basai Darapur, New Delhi. The said communication a copy of which was also forwarded to the petitioner indicates that...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Reported in : (2006)104TTJ(Jodh.)149
1. Both these appeals filed by the assessee against two separate orders of the CIT(A) dt. 1st Jan., 2004 and 5th Jan., 2004 pertaining to asst.yrs. 2000-01 and 2001-02 involve identical questions of fact and law.So these are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience.2. At the time of hearing, Shri Sanjay Jhanwar and Shri M.S. Jhanwar were present on behalf of the assessee and filed written submissions and Shri D.R. Zala was present on behalf of the Department.3. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the assessee is a private limited company. It is an industrial undertaking engaged in the business of sawing of marble blocks into slabs and tiles and also in trading of marble blocks and tiles in both indigenous and foreign market. The assessee-company also exported goods and earned foreign exchange and claimed deduction under Section 80HHC of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Apart from trading of marble, the assessee-company also deriv...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Marek v. Chesney - 473 U.S. 1 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Marek v. Chesney, 473 U.S. 1 (1985) Marek v. Chesney No. 83-1437 Argued December 5, 1984 Decided June 27, 1985 473 U.S. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Petitioner police officers, in answering a call on a domestic disturbance, shot and killed respondent's adult son. Respondent, in his own behalf and as administrator of his son's estate, filed suit against petitioners in Federal District Court under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and state tort law. Prior to trial, petitioners made a timely offer of settlement of $100,000, expressly including accrued costs and attorney's fees, but respondent did not accept the offer. The case went to trial and respondent was awarded $5,000 on the state law claim, $52,000 for the 1983 violation, and $3,000 in punitive damages. Respondent then filed a request for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. 1988, which provides that a prevailing party in a 1983 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1939)1MLJ831
Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J. 1. This appeal raises the question of right of illegitimate sons of a member of a joint family of the Sudra caste to maintenance out of the family estate when it is impartible. The suit was filed by the respondents in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Nellore to establish their status as illegitimate sons of Venugopal, the paternal uncle of the appellant, the Maharajah of Venkatagiri, and the right which they claimed to maintenance out of the Venkatagiri zemindari, the succession to which is governed by the law of primogeniture. They averred that they were entitled under a deed of family settlement, dated the 8th April, 1889, to an allowance of Rs. 1,000 per mensem from the death of their father, which occurred on the 20th June, 1920, but their claim did not rest on the deed alone. They said that irrespective of the deed they were entitled to an allowance for maintenance by custom and also under Hindu Law. The appellant refused to recognise the respo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1976)2MLJ291
M.M. Ismail, J.1. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 379 of 1967, on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Erode, is the appellant herein.2. The appellant is the son of one A.B. Nagaraja Aiyar, the mortgagee under Exhibit A-1, dated September, 1952, executed by one N.T. Perumal Gounder, the deceased husband of the second respondent-second defendant, for a sum of Rs. 7,500. The first respondent first defendant is stated to be a foster son of the said Perumal Gounder. The mortgage deed provided that the amount secured under the document, viz., Rs. 7,500 was payable on the expiry of three years from the date of the mortgage. The suit itself was instituted on 15th November, 1967. In the plaint, by way of explaining the delay in claiming exemption from the bar of limitation, the appellant stated in paragraph 8:Cause of section for the suit arose on 7th September, 1962, when the mortgage was executed at Satyamangalam, on 7th September, 1955,when the three year period fixed under the mortgag...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR2004Cal106,(2004)1CALLT362(HC),2004(2)CHN142
A.K. Banerjee, J.1. For the purpose of communication in the year 1898 Indian Post Office Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act') came into force. Under the provisions of the said act the Postal Authority is to act as a media for the purpose of communicating between the individuals as well as various organisations under the said Act for despatch of postal articles. The addressor is to affix postage for such particular article the rate of which is to be fixed from time to time by the Union of India by virtue of Parliamentary enactment. By the said Act the Government was empowered to frame rules under the said Act. Accordingly, rules framed which are called as Indian Post Office Rules (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Rules'). Subsequently, the postal authority framed a guideline being called as 'Post Office Code' which was time to time amended.2. Under the post office guidelines any bulk consumer under the Indian Post Office Act has been given an opportunity to use a franking...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8283 OF2014(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.18676 of 2012) Surjit Singh & Ors. ... Appellants Versus Gurwant Kaur & Ors. ...Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Leave granted. The respondent No.1 instituted Civil Suit No.78 of 2003 in the Court of the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Patti, district Taran Taran, for specific performance of contract entered into between him and the appellant No.1, the predecessor-in-interest of appellants Nos. 2 to 4 and the respondent No.2 for sale of land admeasuring 28 K12M bearing khata Khatoni 330/1254, 1256, 331/1261 and Killa Nos. 34/25 (712), 40/1/1 (4-15), 10/2 min (0-8), 41/5 min (2-8) 6/1 (7-5) 15/1 (2-16), 34/162 (3-8), situated in village Talwandi Sobha Singh Tehsil Patti District Amritsar as per Jamabandi for the year 1997-98 at the rate of Rs.3,22,500/- per Killa which included all rights attached to the land. It was averred in the plaint that ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR227(Delhi); 140(2007)DLT654
Vikramajit Sen, J.1. This Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as A and C Act) praying for the appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon disputes that have arisen between the parties arising out of an Agreement dated 21.6.2000 which contains an Arbitration Clause. It inter alias contemplates that disputes pertaining to 'any notified claim of the contract included in its Final Bill' shall be referred to arbitration by a Sole Arbitrator selected by the Contractor from a panel of three persons nominated by the General Manager of Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL for brevity). Although the Petition has been strenuously contested, in its Reply to the Petition the Respondent/IOCL has already mentioned the names of three persons for selection as the Sole Arbitrator. 2. Mr. Kaura, learned Counsel for the IOCL has resisted the reference to arbitration on the ground that it was imperative for the Petitioner to ha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1997KAR2956
S. Rajendra Babu, J.1. In the year 1991 the Government of India decided to liberalise the policy for the development of power Sector in India. Electricity (Supply) Act. 1948 was amended by the Electricity Laws (Amendment) Act of 1991 to enable private parties to establish, operate and maintain generating stations. A scheme was formulated by Government of India on 22nd October, 1991 to encourage the private enterprises to take part in power generation, supply and distribution which was published in the Gazette of India, The said scheme provided that the Generating company can enter into a contract for the sale of electricity generated by it with the State Electricity Board in any State where it owns/operates generating station/stations or in any other State it is carrying on its activities or with any ether person with the consent of the competent Government concerned. The procedure for fixing the tariff for the sale of electricity was also provided in the scheme. Government of India co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2007(8)SCALE99; (2007)10SCC504; 2008(1)SLJ256(SC)
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. These two appeals being inter-related and arising out of a common judgment were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (for short 'RIMS') is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act. Dr. (Mrs.) S. Bhagyabati Devi (for short 'Bhagyabati') and Dr. Taruni Ngangbam (for short 'Taruni') have been working in RIMS.3. Dr. Taruni was appointed as a Medical Officer (SPM) in the year 1983. She did her post graduation in the year 1992. In terms of the rules framed by the Executive Council of RIMS, she could be considered for promotion to the post of Assistant Professor on the expiry of 10 years of working in the post of Medical Officer. She was promoted with effect from 1.2.1995 in the post of Assistant Professor by an Order dated 8.4.1999. Dr. Bhagyabati was appointed as a Medical Officer in the year 1984. She completed her post graduation in June, 1996. On completio...
Tag this Judgment!