Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 10 amendment of section 9 Sorted by: recent Year: 1933 Page 1 of about 48 results (0.526 seconds)

Gaekwar Baroda State Railway Vs. Sheik Habib Ullah

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1934All740; 153Ind.Cas.824

..... of princes and states in india in alliance with her majesty, whether in the service of the government of india or otherwise.10. further extensions of the indian councils act of 1861 were made by the amending act of 1869 (32 and 33 victoria, ch. 98) and by that of 1892 (55 and 56 victoria, ch. 14). the ..... indian councils act of 1909 and the government of india act of 1919, which did not effect any charge of substance, were passed after the civil procedure code and need not be considered in detail. it is ..... not necessary to consider the question whether a person residing in an indian state should be considered a foreigner or british subject, as in either case under the indian councils act of 1861 as amended subsequently, the governor-general of india in council is authorised to make laws applicable to them. ample safeguards were .....

R.T. Rangachari Vs. Secretary of State

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1934Mad516

..... the defendants claiming a declaration that the reclaimed land was part of that parish for nil civil and parochial purposes within the meaning of section 27, poor law amendment act, 1868. government objected to make the contribution until the question of whether the reclaimed land was extra-parochial or not was decided and suggestion early decision. such ..... bean followed the plaintiff was not precluded from bringing an action. another single judge, however, of the calcutta high court has in bimalacharan batadyal v. trustees for the indian musuem 1930 cal. 404 in which gould v. stuart (1896) a.c. 575 is again referred to and discussed has distinguished satish chandra das v. secy. ..... decided that case and relied upon gould v. stuart (1896) a.c. 575 misapprehended the grounds for that decision. costello, j., in bimalacharan batadyal v. trustees for the indian musuem 1930 cal. 404, in my view, correctly interprets the decision in gould v. stuart (1896) a.c. 575. it seems to me that the tenure of .....

Musammat Allah Rakhi Vs. Shah Mohammad Abdur Rahim

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1934)36BOMLR408

..... property or proceeds, shall be barred by any length of time.13. section 10 was amended by section 2 of the indian limitation (amendment) act, 1929, which provided as follows:2. in section 10 of the indian limitation act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the said act), the following paragraph shall be inserted, namely:for the purposes of this section any property ..... the law of limitation which was applicable to the suit at that time.16. the provisions, therefore, of the amendment act of 1929 are not applicable, and the question is whether the unamended section 10 of the indian limitation act of 1908 is applicable to this suit.17. in order to bring the suit within that section it would be ..... a specific purpose, and the manager of any such property shall be deemed to be the trustee thereof.14. it was provided by section 1(2) that the said amendment act should come into force on january 1, 1929.15. the suit, which is the subject of this appeal, was brought on january 29, 1926, and the question .....

In Re: Ponniah Lopes and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 150Ind.Cas.977; (1934)66MLJ572

..... court is competent to inflict. and there was the explanation that separable offences which come within the provisions of section 71, indian penal code, are not distinct offences within the meaning of this section. as amended, the section provides that when a person is convicted at one trial of two or more offences the court may, subject ..... view of the law as taken in queen-empress v. bana punja i.l.r. (1892) bom. 260 (f.b.).7. section 35, criminal procedure code, before its amendment in 1923, provided that when a person is convicted at one trial of two or more distinct offences, the court may sentence him, for such offences, to the several ..... offences of rioting and grievous hurt were not legal where it was found that such persons individually did not commit any act which amounted to voluntarily causing hurt, but were guilty of that offence under section 149, indian penal code. in the majority judgment it was remarked thatthe offence of voluntarily causing hurt under section 324, coupled .....

Sir Rajendra Nath Mukerjee Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1934)36BOMLR267

..... therein as they held in martin & co. in the year 1927-28 martin & co. was a registered firm while3. burn & co. was unregistered. under the indian income-tax act registered and unregistered firms are differently taxed in various important respects.4. on april 7, 1927, the income-tax officer of district i issued a notice to burn & co ..... the purchasers was to embark on a separate venture unconnected with martin & co.6. in consequence of this decision the assessment which had been made on martin & co. was amended by the elimination therefrom of the income returned by burn & co., and on november 8, 1930, an assessment, being the assessment under appeal, was made on burn & ..... they were finally assessed (as partners of martin & co.) without any of their shares in the profits of burn & co. being included. in their lordships' opinion the amendment of martin & co.'s assessment by the elimination of burn & co.'s profits with a view to the separate assessment of the latter cannot in any proper sense be .....

Ramgopal Shriram Vs. Ramgopal Bhutada

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1934Bom307; (1934)36BOMLR643

..... standpoint the second darkhast must be time-barred, and the respondent could not get the benefit of the amending act of 1929, because that act came into force on january 1, 1929, i.e., after the respondent had lost his right under the former act, and that therefore the second darkhast could not be regarded as within time at all. this point ..... provides that if the provisions of rule 11 are not fulfilled, then the application has to be returned to the party, and it is only after the application is amended that it shall be deemed to have been an application in accordance with law and presented on the date when it was first presented.14. it is no doubt true ..... court, such an application will be effectual to stay the progress of limitation whether the court admits, or rejects, or returns the application or allows such application to be amended;so that, according to this test each case would depend on its own facts as to whether the application for execution was or was not in accordance with law. .....

Joharmal Ramkaran Vs. Laxmandas Shivlal

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1934Bom467; (1934)36BOMLR983

..... is to be treated as if the single proprietor so trading constituted a firm for the purpose of order xxx, although under the definition of a firm under the indian contract act there can be no firm unless there are at least two partners. if the case of a single proprietor is to be treated as a firm for the purpose ..... mr. amin has applied that if the court is against him on the merits of his contention, it should allow the plaintiffs to amend the plaint. i grant this application. the plaintiffs are given liberty to amend the plaint and proceedings by inserting the name of hemraj shivlal as party defendant in place of the firm laxmandas shivlal. the plaintiffs must ..... ; pay all costs occasioned by this amendment including the costs of to-day's hearing and of making the amendment. the defendant to be added is given liberty to file fresh points of defence. if no amendment is made within a week from this date, the suit is to be placed on board .....

Yarborough Vs. Yarborough

Court : US Supreme Court

..... in circumstances which may prevent the operation of the latter provision of the constitution. the georgia judgment with which we are now concerned does not infringe the fourteenth amendment, for georgia had "jurisdiction" of the parties and subject matter at the time its judgment was rendered. the possibility of conflict of the georgia judgment with ..... of pennsylvania law rev. 371. cf. 33 columbia law rev. 854, 866. the constitutional provision giving congress power to prescribe the effect to be given to acts, records, and proceedings would have been quite unnecessary had it not been intended that congress should have a latitude broader than that given the courts by the full ..... that of her father, [ footnote 16 ] and her domicile continued to be in georgia until entry of the judgment in question. she was not capable, by her own act, of changing her domicile. [ footnote 17 ] neither the temporary residence in north carolina at the time the divorce suit was begun [ footnote 18 ] nor her removal .....

Shiva NaraIn Jafa Vs. the Hon'ble Judges of the High Court of Judicatu ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 150Ind.Cas.699

..... patent are subject to the legislative powers of the governor-general in legislative council. it follows that the provisions of the letters patent can be amended from time to time by imperial act and that fresh jurisdiction not specifically conferred by the letters patent may be conferred on the high court to hear and try cases not expressly provided ..... and issuing of commissions. section 13(2) provides that such enquiry shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the indian penal code; and a tribunal shall be deemed to be a civil court for the purposes of sections 480, 482 and 485 of the criminal procedure code.16. lastly, the ..... that the order passed in such a proceeding is not an order passed in the exercise of original jurisdiction of the high court, conferred upon it by the indian bar councils act, modifying to some extent the power conferred upon it by the letters patent. at the same time, we would say that the mere fact that the words .....

Moulvi Khalilur Rahman Khan Vs. the Collector of Etah

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1934)36BOMLR237

..... date of the application for execution was the time from which the period of limitation was to run, and it was not until the amending act of 1927 was passed that the result of the application, viz., the final order passed on the application, became the material time.34. it was, therefore, the application and ..... objections raised by the judgment-debtor could not now be maintained.19. in the case cited, the question, stated briefly, was whether under article 182(5) of the indian limitation act (ix of 1908) it is sufficient to show that an application was made in accordance with law to the proper court for execution or to take some steps in ..... before the board by the learned counsel for the appellant, and the only arguments presented to the board were in relation to the other point, which was based upon the indian limitation act.12. the appellant alleged that the application for execution, in respect of which the above-mentioned order of the subordinate judge, dated april 22, 1929, was made, was .....