Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 10 amendment of section 9 Sorted by: old Year: 1961 Page 6 of about 324 results (0.530 seconds)

Braden Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... opposing the subcommittee's page 365 u. s. 435 activities. he contends that, under such circumstances, an inquiry into his personal and associational conduct violated his first amendment freedoms. on these grounds, the petitioner would differentiate the constitutional issues here from those that were before the court in barenblatt, supra. but barenblatt did not confine ..... united states, 279 u. s. 263 , 279 u. s. 299 , not to be justified because one acted in good faith, the court saying, "his mistaken view of the law is no defense." yet no issue concerning the first amendment was involved in the sinclair case. when it is involved, as it is here, the propriety of the ..... question in terms of pertinency should be narrowly resolved. the resolution under which the committee on un-american activities acted in this case [ footnote 3/2 ] is precisely .....

Raja Sir Harinder Singh Vs. S. Bhag Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1961P& H443

..... the gratuity would be paid to their servants on their retirement.23. in air 1933 cal 409, the employee who was claiming gratuity, was in the service of east indian railway and had been discharged. according to rule 1 of the rules for the grant of gratuities, it was stated that bonuses were to be given at the discretion of ..... the facts of the case that there was relationship of agent and principal between the plaintiff and the defendant and that the article applicable was article 90 of the limitation act, his lordship then proceeded):the agency in this case was created for specific items and with respect to each one, a separate amount had been received by the ..... recompense and it cannot be demanded as of right, as it does not involve a return of consideration. gratuity is voluntarily given by way of favour and as an act of grace.gratuity is not founded on any legal liability but is a mere bounty stemming from appreciation and graciousness and, therefore, it is capable of being given or .....

Donald Miranda Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-ii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1233; [1961]42ITR166(SC); [1962]1SCR133

..... doubt the words in the english rule are 'shall be treated as profits for the year in which the payment is received', and in s. 11(11) of the indian finance act, 1946, such sum has to be treated as income of the previous year but as pointed out by this court in balfour and mc gregor case : [1959]36itr65(sc ..... profits tax payable in respect of a business for any chargeable accounting period was an allowable expenditure. under s. 11(11) of the indian finance act, 1946, any excess profits refunded under the provisions of the indian finance act, 1942, or of s. 2 of the excess profits tax ordinance, 1943, were deemed to be income and were to be treated ..... or of section 2 of the excess profits tax ordinance, 1943, shall be deemed to be income for the purposes of the indian income-tax act, 1922, and shall, notwithstanding the provisions of section 34 of that act, be treated as income of the previous year which constitutes or includes the chargeable accounting period in respect of which the said sum .....

P. Achiah Chetty and ors. Vs. State of Mysore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1962Kant218; AIR1962Mys218

..... substantial reasons why the contesting respondents cannot take shelter under the principle stated by the learned advocate-general on their behalf. neither the impugned statute nor the amending act contains any indication whatever of circumstances in which , or the considerations or principles on which , the descretion vested in the government under section 27-a is ..... 1959. (7) the petitioners in writ petition 1083 of 1959 are not residents of bangalore, the first of them being the wife of an officer in indian embassy, washington, and the second the wife of a doctor at madras. they became aware of the land acquisition proceedings only after the publication of the ..... sections 4(2) and 28 to 32 of the madras prohibition act were void under section 107 of the government of india act of 1935 because they were repugnant to the provisions of existing indian laws with respect to same matter viz., the indian evidence act and the criminal procedure code -- a question very similar to the one now .....

Yeshwanta Mahadeo Dhirde Vs. Nandkishore Ghanashyamlal Jaiswal

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR628

..... the high court. a preliminary objection was raised to the tenability of the revision. it was held by farran c.j. that a district judge acting under section 23 of the bombay district municipal act amendment act, ii of 1884, is not a court within the meaning of the words in section 622 of the civil procedure code and that the high court had ..... election petitions are to be filed and that this is a common practice and is to be found in connection with cases arising under the guardians and wards act and the indian succession act. in the result, the court came to the conclusion that the interpretation put on section 20-a(2) of the c.p. & berar municipalities ..... act by kaushalendra rao j. was erroneous. with great respect, i find considerable difficulty in following this decision; for one thing, series of decisions of this court already quoted .....

General Construction and Supply Co. Vs. Income-tax Officer (8th) C-war ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1962]44ITR16(Bom)

..... a partnership firm doing business in bombay. the income-tax officer had assessed the appellants under section 23 (3) read with section 34 (i) (a) of the indian income-tax act for the assessment year 1947-48. he included in the assessable income a sum of rs. 85,000 as the income of the appellants from some undisclosed sources. ..... after 31st march, 1951, the remedy available to the income-tax department to assess the income, which had escaped assessment, had become time barred before the section was amended and that consequently, no action can now be taken in order to assess such income. he has relied on the decision of this court in prashar v. vasantsen dwarkadas ..... in which it was held that where the remedy available to the income-tax officer had become barred under section 34 before its amendment in 1953, the vested right of the assessee could not be affected except by clear and express terms used by the legislature, and that the legislature did not .....

State Vs. Venishanker Kalidas Bhatt

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1962)3GLR33

..... to co-operative societies. this is clear from the preamble itself which provides that for the purpose of promoting thrift self-help etc. it is expedient to consolidate and amend the law relating to co-operative societies. the words relating to a public religious or charitable object are found in clause (b) of the definition. the enactment ..... stamp duties fees and so on. some of these may be public objects hut it cannot be said that prisons and boilers etc. are public objects. there can be no doubt that the object of all indian enactments is generally a public one. but that does not mean that the enactments relate to a public object. we must ..... as to bring about better living better business and better methods of production and for that purpose to consolidate and amend the law relating to co-operative societies. no doubt the object of enacting the bombay co-operative societies act 1925 is to promote thrift self-help and mutual aid among agriculturists and other persons etc. in that sense .....

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Kandimalla Subbaiah and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1241; 1961CriLJ302; [1962]1SCR194

..... the circumstances stated by the high court, and therefore he will have that jurisdiction which he is competent to exercise under the prevention of corruption act or the criminal law amendment act. section 6 of the former provides that the state government may appoint a special judge to try the following offences : (a) an offence ..... in addition said to have committed offences under s. 420, indian penal code. 4. the subordinate judge, vijayawada was appointed as special judge under the provisions of s. 6 of the criminal law amendment act, 1952 (ii of 1952) to try offences under the prevention of corruption act, 1947. he framed the following charges : 'charge no. ..... punishable under section 161, section 165 or section 165a of the indian penal code (act xlv of 1860) or sub-section (2) of section 5 of the prevention of corruption act, 1947 .....

Dafedar Niranjan Singh and anr. Vs. Custodian, Evacuee Property (Pb.) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1425; [1962]1SCR214

..... consideration. there, on references made to the high court under s. 66 of the indian income-tax act, 1922, the high court made orders before april 1, 1926. on april 1, 1926, the income-tax (amendment) act, 1926, came into force and under that amendment a right of appeal was given to an aggrieved party against the order of a ..... that application, the powers of the custodian and the additional custodian of evacuee property of review and revision under s. 26 of the act were taken away by the administration of evacuee property (amendment) act xci of 1956. on april 2, 1957, the additional custodian submitted the case to the custodian-general of evacuee property to enable him ..... this appeal turns upon the interpretation of the words 'previous operation of that ordinance'. 17. this act was amended from time to time and the latest of the amendments was by act 91 of 1956. as nothing turns upon the provisions of the amending acts, we need not consider all of them; it would be enough if s. 7a which was .....

The Central Provinces Syndicate (Private) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Inc ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1962]45ITR6(Bom)

..... on the amount in dispute (namely,under section 66 of the indian ... the difference between the amountincome tax act, 1922. actually assessed andamount admitted by the assessee asassessable) subject to the minimumfee of fifty rupees.'---------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. by a subsequent amendment, the portion of the article in the third column was amended, and the said amended article now reads as follows : ---------------------------------------------------------------------1 2 3---------------------------------------------------------------------'16 application .....