Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 10 amendment of section 9 Sorted by: old Year: 1961 Page 11 of about 324 results (0.464 seconds)

Bengal Silk Mills Co. Vs. Ismail Golam HossaIn Ariff

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1962Cal115,65CWN856

..... with the power conferred on them by the articles of association of the company. before the trial court counsel for the defendant contended that the indian companies act 1913 both before and after its amendment by the indian companies amendment act 1936 required that the company must have directors, that the balance-sheets must be prepared and signed by the directors and that the relevant ..... 4 will -- 4 c. 42), see re atlantic and pacific fibre importing and ., 1928 ch. 836 under section 1 of lord tentenden's act 1828 (9 geo. 4, c. 14) read with section 13 of the mercantile law amendment act 1856 (19 and 20 vict. c. 97), see re the coliseum (barrow) ltd., (1930) 2 ch. 44 at p; 47 and under ..... sections. 23 and 24 of the limitation act 1939 (c. 21), see ledingham v. bermejo estancia co. ltd., (1947)1 all er 749 and jones .....

United Arab Republic and anr. Vs. Mirza Ali Akbar Kashani

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1962Cal387

..... may sue, and shall be sued in the name of his state.'.....after the integration of the indian states the central legislature amended sections 86 and 87 and also introduced sections 87a and 87b by act ii of 1951. as a result of the amendment sections 86(1) and 87 now stand as follows:-- 'section 86(1)--no ruler of a ..... upon any 'sovereign prince or ruling chief whether in subordinate alliance with the british government or otherwise.' the new sections 86 and 87a introduced by the civil procedure amendment act (ii of 1951) now extend the personal immunity to any ruler of a foreign state who is defined as the person who is for the time being recognised ..... 1877. the civil procedure codes of 1877, 1882 and 1908 specially provided for the immunity of sovereign princes and ruling chiefs from suits. the civil procedure code 1908 as amended by act ii of 1951 has extended the immunity to all heads of foreign states. but the code has not specially provided for the immunity of a foreign state. the .....

Dominion of India Vs. Kaniz Fatma and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1961)IILLJ197All

..... court after the passing of the constitution of india and secondly, that view is no more a good law after the legislature expressed its intention in unambiguous terms in the amending act of 1951. both these contentions cannot be accepted. so far as the first contention goes, it has been held in the case of radharani das v. sisir kumar and ors ..... fact that the workman was at the time of the injury a workman of, or in the service, of, or engaged in the work of, the employer.12. by the amending act of 1951, clause (d) has been substituted and it reads as follows:3. where personal injury is caused to a workman(d) by reason of the ..... on the indian courts and they could not refuse to follow them. in view of these authorities and the provisions in article 225 of the constitution, the law laid down by the privy council has a binding effect and has to be followed.17. so far as the second argument relating to the intention expressed by the legislature in the amending act of .....

Burton Vs. Wilmington Parking Authority

Court : US Supreme Court

..... owned buildings. as the chancellor pointed out, in its lease with eagle, the authority could have affirmatively required eagle to discharge the responsibilities under the fourteenth amendment imposed upon the private enterprise as a consequence of state participation. but no state may effectively abdicate its responsibilities by either ignoring them or by merely ..... supreme court of delaware reversed, as we mentioned above, holding that eagle, "in the conduct of its business, is acting in a purely private capacity." it therefore denied appellant's claim under the fourteenth amendment. upon reaching the application of state law, it held, contrary to appellant's assertion that eagle maintained an inn, ..... 's tax exemption. page 365 u. s. 720 the authority further agreed to furnish heat for eagle's premises, gas service for the boiler room, and to make, at its own expense, all necessary structural repairs, all repairs to exterior surfaces except store fronts and any repairs caused by lessee' .....

R. Shanmugha Rajeswara Sethupathi Vs. the First Additional Income-tax ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1962)1MLJ51

..... prays for writs of prohibition as the assessments in those cases have not yet proceeded beyond the stage of the issue of notices under section 34 of the indian income-tax act.3. since the question calling for determination in all these petitions is identical in so-far as it relates to the assessability to tax of the interim payments ..... writ petitions came on for hearing, orders of assessment had been made in respect of the subsequent assessment years also and the prayer in regard to those years stands amended to suit the circumstances, viz., writs of certiorari are also prayed for in respect of these cases.5. we have noticed above that the main contention raised by ..... possession of some of the buildings on the estate. while section 3, sub-clause (e) made no specific reference to such rights of the landholder, in its amended form it recognised the landholder's rights to these privileges.15. we are unable to accept the argument of the learned advocate-general that solely for the reason that .....

Bachna Ram Sawan Ram Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1962P& H85

..... is an appeal from the order of the subordinate judge, 1st class. hissar, staying the proceedings of a suit on an application made under s. 34 of the indian arbitration act, 1940.(2) it appears that the appellant entered into a contract with the government (public works department) for the excavation of earth in connection with the bhakra-main ..... that there was a valid agreement between the parties to refer the matter to arbitration and the suit was liable to be stayed under section 34 of the indian arbitration act. he consequently, stayed the suit and ordered that the dispute be referred to the arbitration of the superintending engineer as stated in the work orders. the ..... 80, civil procedure code, was given on 19-9-1955.(3) on receiving the notice of the suit the punjab state filed an application under s. 34 of indian arbitration act, praying that the suit should be stayed as there was an arbitration clause in the contract which mentioned that in matters of dispute the case shall be referred .....

Ram Chandra Prasad Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1629; 1961CriLJ811; [1962]2SCR50

..... . on an application by the accused, the high court transferred it to the court of the munsif-magistrate at patna. subsequent to this order of transfer, the criminal law amendment act, 1952 (act xlvi of 1952) came into force on july 28, 1952. the case, thereafter, was forwarded to the special judge at patna in view of s. 10 of the ..... the order of the patna high court dismissing the appellant's appeal against his conviction for offences under s. 161, indian penal code and s. 5(2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1947 (act ii of 1947), hereinafter called the act. 2. the appellant was the construction engineer at sindhri r. b. basu was a contractor living in calcutta and ..... , be charged at the same trial.' sub-section (1) makes the offences under s. 161, indian penal code and s. 5(2) of the act triable by a special judge only. the appellant has been tried by a special judge appointed under the act. his grievance is not with respect to the competency of the court which tried him, but is .....

Sakharam @ Bapusaheb Narayan Sanas and anr. Vs. Manikchand Motichand S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1963SC354; (1962)64BOMLR403; [1962]2SCR59

..... is not a protected tenant'. 4. under s. 3a(1) aforesaid, it was open to the landlord, within one year of the date of the commencement of the amending act of 1946, to make an application to the mamlatdar for a declaration that the tenant was not a 'protected tenant'. no such proceeding appears to have been taken. ..... for a period of not less than six years immediately preceding either the first day of january, 1938, or the first day of january, 1945, (added by the amending act of 1946) and has cultivated such land personally during the aforesaid period. it is not disputed that the defendants-appellants became entitled to the status of 'protected tenants' ..... as a result of the operation of the act, as amended by the bombay tenancy (amendment) act, 1946 (bombay act xxvi of 1946), and under s. 3a(1) the defendants were deemed to be 'protected tenants' under the act and their rights as such were recorded in the record of rights. sections 3 and 3a .....

Eveready Flashlight Co. Vs. Labour Court and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1962All497; [1961(2)FLR598]; (1961)IILLJ204All

..... several reasons to agree with learned counsel's contention that the meaning of this phrase must be restricted to the definition contained in the indian trade union (amendment) act of 1947. first, that act never came into effect. its first section provided that it would come into force on a date to be appointed by the central government ..... contended that this phrase should be given a restricted meaning. he referred to the definition of 'unfair practice' contained in the indian trade unions (amendment) act 1947 (no. xlv of 1947). there is a special chapter in this act dealing with unfair practice. section 23 (1) defines unfair practice by recognised trade unions and section 28 (k) deals ..... particulars or dates of these warnings, in spite of repeated questions by the court. it is significant that the warning of 10th september was in writing. act one stage of his argument learned counsel explained that such warning are useally given in writing. if that be so, there should be a written record of .....

Major E.G. Barsay Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1762; 1961CriLJ828; [1962]2SCR195

..... stated thus : the appellant and the other accused have committed offences under the indian penal code and the prevention of corruption act. by reason of s. 7 of the criminal law (amendment) act, 1952, the said offences are triable by a special judge appointed under that act. the special judge so appointed would have jurisdiction to try the said offences ..... anything contained in any other law. if that be so, the special judge had exclusive jurisdiction to try offences covered by s. 6 of the criminal law (amendment) act, 1952. 37. at this stage, another argument of learned counsel may be adverted to. he says that some of the offences with which the accused are charged ..... magistrate equally applies to a special judge. this argument overlooks the limited purpose for which s. 8(1) is enacted. section 8 of the criminal law (amendment) act makes distinction between the power of a special judge to take cognizance of an offence and the procedure to be followed by him in trying the case. in .....